Slashdot Mirror


Bill Would Declare Your Blog a Weapon

Mike writes "Law prof Eugene Volokh blogs about a US House of Representatives bill proposed by Rep. Linda T. Sanchez and 14 others that could make it a federal felony to use your blog, social media like MySpace and Facebook, or any other Web media 'to cause substantial emotional distress through "severe, repeated, and hostile" speech.' Rep. Sanchez and colleagues want to make it easier to prosecute any objectionable speech through a breathtakingly broad bill that would criminalize a wide range of speech protected by the First Amendment. The bill is called The Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, and if passed into law (and if it survives constitutional challenge) it looks almost certain to be misused."

22 of 780 comments (clear)

  1. Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Would Declare Your Blog a Weapon

    Sweet, the right to a blog would be protected by both the first and second amendments!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      All I want to know is who the hell is this Bill, and why does he hate my blog so much?

      No, I couldn't be bothered to read more than the headline. Thanks for asking.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a good start, but lets try to get ALL the amendments!

      Next up: the third amendment. You know, because calling a blog a weapon isn't much more logical than saying being forced not to blog is the same as being forced to quarter the armed forces. The fourth amendment, search and seizure shouldn't be as much of a leap. Getting it to qualify under the 5th is going to be the first real challenge.

      I think we should stop at the 12th though. Don't really see how dates of presidential elections can be applied to blogs.

    3. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Getting it to qualify under the 5th is going to be the first real challenge.

      You have the right to an empty blog. Anything you blog about can and will be used against you.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obama is more than likely to veto this bill, assuming it passes. He's a constitutional scholar.

    5. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fortunately, I do all my cyberbullying from a sockpuppet blog.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    6. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      > This law will further criminalize every teenager in America.

      A: "What were you two convicted of?"
      G1: "Well... I took a nude picture of myself and sent it to my boyfriend."
      A: "And how about you?"
      G2: "I kept telling her she was an idiot for taking a nude picture of herself. I made her cry."

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And furthermore, it makes wussies and nerds a protected class! W00t!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:Covered By Twenty Percent of the Bill of Rights by thelonious · · Score: 2, Funny

      The hell you say. I consider any word with "bacca" in it to be offensive, hostile, and ugly. I also don't like the name "Sue". If I, or anyone like me, get to be a judge, you're toast.

      So we have nothing to fear then.

  2. AKA the ED law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure this law would shut down Encyclopedia Dramatica, and most of 4chan in a heartbeat.

    That said, nothing of value was lost.

    1. Re:AKA the ED law by Veggiesama · · Score: 4, Funny

      That said, nothing of value was lost.

      Aside from our freedom of speech, that is.

      And lolcats.
       
      :3

  3. Bang! by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, sorry. I didn't know it was loaded.

    --
    Sig this!
  4. Repeated and hostile speech. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Funny

    .....make it a federal felony to use your blog, social media like MySpace and Facebook, or any other Web media 'to cause substantial emotional distress through "severe, repeated, and hostile" speech.' Rep. Sanchez and colleagues want to make it easier to prosecute any objectionable speech.....

    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.
    Rep. Sanchez is a dick.

    Hostile enough for ya?

    (Apparently, /. filters already limit repeated speech, as I need to add a bunch of crap in to get past the "postercomment compression filter", whatever the hell that is. So /. is a giant government conspiracy, implementing constitution-destroying legislation before it's even proposed....)

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  5. But my blog doesn't use SSL yet by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have not yet deployed the munitions.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  6. Seriously? by AnalogyShark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone is really trying to make trolling illegal?

    Don't they realize that acknowledging trolls just makes them worse?

  7. Re:How far does free speech go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Something your mom doesn't like?

    Funny. Last night your mom said she really liked it.

  8. Re:Not too worried by Foolicious · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not possible to illegally harass a corporation.

    Finally someone understands. That's EXACTLY what I kept trying to explain to both my parole office and the judge!

    --
    Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
  9. Re:Only way to respond by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Funny

    You make a good point - Linda is, after all, one dirty Sanchez!

  10. Lame Excuse to Pimp My Blog by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...or at least one of them.

    Highlights include the fact that Jack Lord could smell into the future, that Poutine is grown from seeds, that you can kill French people by carefully mispronouncing the French language in their presence, and that Lee Majors can travel through time.

    Clearly I'm batshit insane, so thank God for bills like the one proposed, since I cause so much anguish to so many. I really need to be stopped.

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  11. You're all on notice by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Modding me down is a form of hate speech!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  12. Re:Not too worried by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Right... so under this bill, criticizing the actions of NAMBLA members with young boys would also be regarded as harrassment? Pedophiles rejoice, you have now become a protected class! Won't somebody please think of the children?!?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  13. Works well against a suicide bomber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you do it, we will jail you afterwards.