More "Miles Per Acre" From Bioelectricity Than Ethanol
CarnegieScience writes "Scientist calculate that, compared to ethanol used for internal combustion engines, bioelectricity used for battery-powered vehicles would deliver an average of 80% more miles of transportation per acre of crops, while also providing double the greenhouse gas offsets to mitigate climate change."
Miles per acre? What's that in rods per hogsheads?
Great, now I have this vision stuck in my head of a gasoline-soaked thread stretching out down the road, with a car spooling it up and wringing the gas out to fuel the engine. That's just weird.
I salute you, sir.
-- Alastair
So saying that NNN technology is X% better than bioethanol is like saying that doing X is less painful than scraping off your penile foreskin with a cheese grater.
But I'm a masochist you insensitive clod!
Or in the case of a Hummer, a garden hose.