How an Intern Stole NASA's Moon Rocks
schwit1 submitted a story telling the strange tale of how in 2002, rogue NASA interns stole millions of dollars in moon rocks from a building designed not to let that happen. I'd suggest taking the whole thing with a little bit of salt.
I particularly like the bit where the interns in question laid the moonrocks down and a mattress and screwed on top of them, thereby making the contamination of the spent samples even worse. Made me wonder who was on the bottom.
Seriously, though, the thing read like a synopsis of a bad TV movie. It may or may not be true, but it's telling that the perp has a book coming out that is an 'augmented' account of the heist, that the author of the linked piece is summarizing what was told him by the perp.
IOW, don't take it with a grain of salt. Kill it with Na fire.
"Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
I'd suggest taking the whole thing with a little bit of salt.
Isn't that what interns said... Minus the salt part.
I think they just calculated the replacement cost.
I read the internet for the articles.
Why would you take the moon rocks with "a little bit of salt"? The salt just adds to what you have to smuggle out of the building.
I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
"The samples they took were from every Apollo mission, ever. Sometime between the heist and its resolution, Tiffany and Thad arranged the moon rocks on a bed--and had sex amongst them."
Talk about getting your rocks off....
Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
I think they just calculated the replacement cost.
So that's why we're going back to the Moon?
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
Well, presumably the rooms are at least 78% or so nitrogen filled. Maybe they just rounded up?
"This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
... that one is by an actual reporter with actual fact checking.
but... it makes no sense... just what business would such an individual have at the LA Times?
The Admin and the Engineer