Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Why Game Exclusivity Deals Are Feeding the Hate

Posted by Soulskill on from the cut-it-out-jerks dept.

Parz writes "The recent announcement that the upcoming Ghostbusters game will be a timed PlayStation exclusive in the PAL territories — revealed a mere month before release — has set a nasty precedent which could have long-term repercussions for the industry. This Gameplayer article explores how this generation of gaming has spiraled into a tit-for-tat war on third-party exclusivity deals instigated by Sony and Microsoft, and the effect it is having on the psychology of the consumers. The Ghostbusters developers aren't pleased by Sony's deal, and the Guardian questions whether the game will be big enough to really affect console sales."

21 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Stupid article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So when Sony does it, its bad; but when Microsoft does it, its ok?

    Seems like the author is just pissed that he has to wait for the game.

    Now you know how PS3 owners felt about Bioshock, Fallout 3 DLC, etc.

    1. Re:Stupid article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are using this as an example where this gen is going. The summary clearly states, "a nasty precedent. . .instigated by Sony and Microsoft"

    2. Re:Stupid article by Steauengeglase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BioShock had Xbox DLC? If I recall it was the PS3 that got the bonus levels, all 350 owners got was horse armor and post-it notes -er bonus plasmids and achievements.

    3. Re:Stupid article by LordVader717 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is very different. Bioshock for example was originally developed as a 360 game, which was later ported to the PS3, by a different developer. This is a situation where the games are finished, one month before release, and Sony decides they want to screw european gamers.
      And it's the regional nature too. If Sony had managed to secure a worldwide deal, I might have more understanding. But selectively screwing european gamers is just very poor.

      I never heard anyone praising cash-buyout exclusivity, apart from Sony fans defending screwy deals like this one.

    4. Re:Stupid article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      SecuROM

    5. Re:Stupid article by koinu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, this is generally NOT OK.

      I am really angry at many game companies. They make really cool games, but don't care to make them available everywhere.

      Game consoles have regional restrictions. The "EU PAL region", I am living in, gets cool games about 11 months after the US/NTSC region. And now I am still waiting for my game that was release in September last year in US. It won't come anymore, the company (well known) told me. Instead they released a boring childish one here as an alternative that the US region does not know.

      Great mess! I am watching videos of this game on youtube (where they are getting blocked, because "licensed content" and stupid shit like youtube is today, but that's another story) and I am seeing people playing it. I am jealous.

      I have always bought Nintendo consoles. They have removed regional restrictions temporarily. And now they are back. I say "fuck you" to Nintendo! You won't get any more cent from me. Go to hell! Really.

      And all of you, stupid game publishers, THINK ABOUT what you do! You hate gamers and buyers of consoles? Then live with it that you don't get any profit and everyone begins to copy and mod their consoles to get the content running they like.

      Money is there. Games are not there! Now what? I have still about 4 japanese games I would like to have. And? I will never get them to run. Fuck you, really!

    6. Re:Stupid article by Narpak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now you know how PS3 owners felt about Bioshock, Fallout 3 DLC, etc.

      Or in regards to Fallout 3; those of us who bought the game via Steam and then wanted to buy the DLC as it arrived.

      For those that don't know Microsoft has retained exclusive distribution rights for Fallout DLC; which means that there are no DLC for PS3 what so ever (from what I have read and heard) and if want to buy the DLC for the PC version you have to do it through Games For Windows Live. Something that means (if you bought it the game through Steam) that you have to install the GFWL client stuff and mess around with that.

      My personal experience was that first the "Live" button inside the Fallout menus would send me to the xBox Marketplace and not give me ANY information on how to go to the PC Marketplace; eventually I start the client through Windows and get the correct list of software; I search through and find the Fallout DLC; but when I press the "buy Microsoft Points" button (yeah you can't pay with money directly for reasons that appear to be entirely motivated by the desire to suck more out of their customers) it sends me to my Hotmail inbox in another browser window (happend over and over). So you know what? I decide that the DLC is TOO much trouble. I wanted to play through Fallout 3 again with the DLC, but it just turns out of be more aggravation than it is worth; and because I now have a faulty GFWL program installed my Fallout 3 version now refuses to Save games until the GFWL servers start working properly and authenticates my KEY (and remember this is my legal version running through Steam that GFWL decided to "lock").

      In short, hurray for greed motivated distribution that directly hinders or counter a potential customers desire to enjoy a product.

      --
      The Long Now Foundation
    7. Re:Stupid article by bangzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That's racial discrimination and should be illegal..."

      - Since Europe and the US have citizens from every race on the planet (and perhaps a few off-planet...) I don't know how you can say that. Perhaps you mean "geographical discrimination"?

      - "Should be illegal" - why? As an owner, you may decide how your work or art is displayed, sold, licensed etc. Why must you be forced to distribute it in a certain geographic region (especially when you have to cover the cost of manufacturing, distribution, merchandising etc)? Would get us rapidly to the point where nothing would be created as the cost of being forced to distribute it (as it would be "illegal" not to do so...) in every territory that wanted it would be prohibitively expensive.

      --
      Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
  2. The whole deal is fanboy fodder by nschubach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't.

    I can't count the number of people complaining about lost exclusives and lack of obtaining them... now that they are stepping up, the stories come out on how it's bad...

    So you have a choice. Piss of fanboys by not getting exclusives or piss off fanboys for getting them and obtaining sales.

    I'm not a fan of exclusiveness in itself. It limits consumer choice. Choice in the best hardware to run their favorite games in this case. I personally think there's only one company right now that can win that war, and it's not Sony.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  3. Microsoft Invented It by ewhac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Didn't Microsoft pull a morally-equivalent stunt when they bought Bungie/Halo all those years ago?

    Schwab

    --
    Editor, A1-AAA AmeriCaptions
    1. Re:Microsoft Invented It by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't Nintendo invent it with the NES publishing contract requiring that the game is NES-exclusive? Ironically they seem to do the least to bribe third parties into Wii exclusivity now though the different hardware still leads to plenty of exclusives.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Microsoft Invented It by fyrewulff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Halo also wasn't anywhere near being done the last time they showed it as a PC game in 2000, that demo was entirely scripted. Once the studio was bought by MS, the game actually got a deadline.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    3. Re:Microsoft Invented It by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah it was likely rushed which is why Halo feels so repetitive.

  4. Re:While Sony & MS battle... by ShadesFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which console does Apple sell again?

    iPhone. More a hand held really...

  5. Expectations by Translation+Error · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While most people generally find exclusives a bit annoying but acceptable, this particular case is different. This isn't Nintendo announcing the next Mario game--only on the Wii. This is a game that was already announced as being multiplatform and even had a release date, but suddenly it's become a timed exclusive for one system. The versions for the other systems will all be ready, but Sony's holding them back. Worse yet, this news is coming with almost no advance warning.

    A big, shiny prize was dangled in front of people and it's been snatched away at the last second. Of course people are going to be angry.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    1. Re:Expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give examples, or I'll assume you're full of shit. When has a multiplatform game turned timed exclusive a month before release?

      I have never seen anything like it in my entire life, so give me a list of the "lots of times". Really, go on.

  6. Re:This will probably never change by walshy007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could well be argued that the PS1 was the run-away success that it was because of exclusive Final Fantasy and Metal Gear Solid franchises. For the PS2, it was much the same, except that it had then gained Grand Theft Auto (yes, I know it came to the PC and 360 later, but by then it really was a one horse race).

    PS1 succeeded because of rampant piracy, then network effects. every man and his dog mod chipped his ps1, and bought a few legit games and downloaded a lot. Also legitimate game prices, ps1 games were a lot cheaper being on cds than their cartridge equivalent.

  7. Same with Hulu by Lord+Lode · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who outside U.S. cannot Hate Hulu for saying "this movie can't be played in your region".

  8. No moron by Snaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its bad when anybody does it (especially Microsoft)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  9. Re:Hate Hulu ? Why ? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hulu is owned by NBC, News Corp, and Disney. The same people who own and control Hulu are the people who own and control the content. It's totally fair to hate on Hulu for arbitrary region restrictions.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Old hat. by seventhevening · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not anything new, although it might be more wide spread now. Last generation, Microsoft paid quite a lot of money to make Shenmue 2 an X-box exclusive, which really shafted fans of the game. In both Europe and Japan, Shenmue was released for dreamcast and players could transfer save files over into the new title. In the US, you would have needed to buy a new console to continue the multi-part game, and even then sacrifice the ability to continue with the same materials you left off with.