Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice UI Design Proposals Published

An anonymous reader writes "Various members of the OpenOffice.org community have been submitting their first revisions of proposals to the OpenOffice.org Call for Design Proposals to redesign the user interface of Open Office. As part of Project Renaissance, attention is being drawn to the OpenOffice user interface, and it's 'user-friendliness.' Among the designs, is FLUX UI, which won an award at the Sun Microsystems Community Innovation Awards Program. Anyone can, and is encouraged, to check out the proposals (scroll to bottom of page) and leave your comments so that the designers can improve their designs for the final deadline for proposal submissions to the community."

7 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I had some ideas, but they are pretty "out ther by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't forget to make sure it's difficult for the visually impaired to use, and impossible for those relying on screen readers to explore the interface as a sighted person could do! You're 99% of the way there already, I'm sure you can come up with the remaining 1%

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  2. Re:Is there something WRONG with the file menu? by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with the standard menu and toolbars is that they don't scale. As each new release of hte product adds new functions, you add more menus and more toolbars and pretty soon your screen is full of toolbars, and you can't find anything in your menus (the stupid auto-hiding menus of Office 2000 was an attempt to deal with this issue, and everyone hated it).

    Like it or not, those that give the Ribbon a real chance like it. They find it easier to use. New users find the Ribbon more intuitive.

    It's only the people who are set in their ways and those that have to be "trained" in everything they do that hve trouble with the transition.

    This is not to say that OOo should have a ribbon. Just that there are real reasons why MS moved to it, and OOo is starting to see some of the same problems. They have to do something.

  3. OO needs no UI redesign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What,

    It needs is a significant amount of effort bringing the graphs in Calc up to a level that even approachs what was available way back in 1986 in Lotus 123.

    Calc's graphs are a MAJOR stumbling block to my being able to push OO to clients as an alternative to XL.

    Redesign graphs, enhance them, whatever you want to call it, fix them please....

  4. Re:Is there something WRONG with the file menu? by Twillerror · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think there is anything wrong with it, but when it starts to fill up it does get more cumbersome.

    I took a job not too long ago where I was in word 90% of the day. Writing business requirements and the lot.

    At the time I had a laptop with Office 2003 and a desktop with Office 2007. For the first little bit I wasn't all that impressed with ribbons, after a few months I dreaded having to use the laptop with Office 2003.

    Change is becoming a harder and harder sell. So many people are trained to one approach that any change whether it is actually better or not is going to come with some resistance. If it's not broke don't fix it mantra. It isn't broke, but that doesn't mean there isn't a better way.

    The round button is annoying and I'd rather they just left a stripped down version of the menu in there. The quick bar and subsequent short cut keys have come in handy and so now it isn't even that big of a deal to me...to start it was definately confusing. As I'm sure getting rid of the "Start" button in Windows was as well.

    Same thing happened to my wife when I started using Ubuntu at home. Took her about a minute to find the top bar, but now it is just part of the deal. She hated Firefox at first, but now doesn't really mind it. At the end of the day things are very similiar.

    Most people who use Office use Office. They are not just typing up some simple little paper, but are in there doing crazy layouts where the new templates in 2007 come in handy. Features slashdot reader might not even know about are used everyday.

    I use OpenOffice 3 at home now and I do find it fairly clumsly to find the some of the more obsure stuff in the menus. It can still take a bit of time with the ribbons, but overall I find it to be more user friendly. Also, the button on the ribbon themselves have been enchanced since Office 2003. In Excel the new conditional formatting is much better. Word has previews all over the place where changing the font actually changes it on the screen before click okay...so you get an acutally preview quickly.

    The ribbons are a nice addon to Office 2007, but alos there is a lot of useful features. If your a student writing papers or just writing a note to the editor I think you could get by with pretty much anything.

    If you like vi then I'd have to ask for you to just sit quitely in the back. To each his own and this conversation is for the GUI lovers :)

  5. Re:I had some ideas, but they are pretty "out ther by Requiem18th · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well on the other hand if new users are trained to use ribbons coping that interface might be beneficial.

    Now some aspects in OO.o are just horrible, the color picker looks *and works* like something straight from 1994.

    I think they should ask for help or at least inspiration from AbiWord.

    Abiword has a wonderful UI, minimalistic yet does 99% of what you want. It's colorful and even cute yet still looks professional. The icons represent exactly what they mean, the menu structure is very intuitive etc.

    The problem of Abiworld is that it can't do *every fukken thing imaginable*, you can --for instance-- underline and/or overline and/or strike anytext, but always using the same color of the font. AFAIK in OO.o 3 you will be able to use 3 different colors for that. I'd personally stab anyone who sends me a document with multiple colors per font.

    In principle you could apply Abiword's elegant GUI design to all the features in OO.o, it just will be a lot of work. But it would still be intuitive and standard.

    This FLUX is both nonstandard and a cheap rip off.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  6. Re:I had some ideas, but they are pretty "out ther by maxume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm really starting to think that all these people that need extensive training to use office software should be out back shoveling sand over a wall. I mean, if they can't get the basics in 10 minutes of clickly-clicky, I shudder to think the pearls of wisdom that will emerge once they get down to 'work'.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  7. Re:Hide all the menus... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You jest, but who ever forgot the keyboard bindings for Word 5 for DOS? Those function key guides were very useful, and keyboard shortcuts were far more useful as a result.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.