Slashdot Mirror
The "Dangers" of Free
With today's Free Summit broaching the subject of the "dangers" of free, TechDirt has an interesting perusal of why free often can't work without a good business model and why it often gets such a bad reputation. "I tend to wonder if this is really a case of free gone wrong or free done wrong. First, I'm always a bit skeptical of 'free' business models that rely on a 'free' scarcity (such as physical newspapers). While it can work in some cases, it's much more difficult. You're not leveraging an infinite good -- you're putting yourself in a big hole that you have to be able to climb out of. Second, in some ways the model that was set up was a static one where everyone focused on the 'free' part, and no one looked at leapfrogging the others by providing additional value where money could be made. The trick with free is you need to leverage the free part to increase the value of something that is scarce and that you control, which is not easily copied. [...] Still, it's an important point that bears repeating. Free, by itself, is meaningless. Free, with a bad business model, isn't helpful either. The real trick is figuring out how to properly combine free with a good business model, and then you can succeed."
Niggerdick. That is all.
Greed, treachory, money-lust, violence, hook nose
Someone sounds upset about getting goatse'd.
Or can't accept the fact that they enjoyed it.
Stupid communists!
Free is for giant companies with reserves to spend on loss leader marketing to acquire customers for new profitable products, usually in a highly competitive space --and Free is for people who have no choice but to trade their time for money! It doesn't matter if we're talking high tech, low tech or no tech.
That the Great Communist, RMS and his hapless minions are particularly active in technology is, well, your problem, if you are gullible to buy into his politics, politics which could only be afforded by a life-long academic (read: no commercial experience), I might add.
I'm not a loon: While all must trade time for money at one point or another, just remember that there are two billion people around the world who have no choice and are just waiting for you to drop your next freeware that will help them duplicate the efforts or benefits of the labor of thousands of people at Microsoft, Apple, Google and any other Western company that makes money with technology. Imagine being in a really bad area of New Orleans, New York, South Chicago or East LA --surrounded by people who want your stuff for food. How many times can you keep walking through and giving up your stuff before you join them?
Suck a niggerdick.
Sincerely, AC
I manage to pay my bills -- which in Boston are not inconsiderable -- by writing Free Software.
Did that make you a "gloomy, miserable wretch"?
http://www.43things.com/person/jmcvetta
Bwahahaha
http://www.43things.com/person/jmcvetta/photos/
I said I never need to use free software, not that I never use free software. You make stupid assumptions and have poor reading comprehension.
And, you keep using the tired argument of "The bad free software does not diminish the good free software" when the reality is that the "bad free software" diminishes "free software" as whole. Just like an transmission with a low signal to noise ratio diminishes the transmission. Your failure to understand that is not just your failure, but the failure of the whole FLOSS community. Most rational people will pay for a shiny pebble before they will dig through a mountain of shit to find one.
There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.