Slashdot Mirror


NY Court Says Police Can't Track Suspect With GPS

SoundGuyNoise sends in a story that brings into relief just how unsettled is the question of whether police can use GPS to track suspects without a warrant. Just a couple of days ago a Wisconsin appeals court ruled that such tracking is OK; and today an appeals court in New York reached the opposite conclusion. "It was wrong for a police investigator to slap a GPS tracking device under a defendant's van to track his movements, the state's top court ruled today. A sharply divided NY Court of Appeals, in a 4-3 decision, reversed the burglary conviction of defendant Scott Weaver, 41, of Watervliet. Four years ago, State Police tracked Weaver over 65 days in connection with the burglary investigation."

4 of 414 comments (clear)

  1. Headline is inaccurate by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The judgment was that they couldn't track a person without a warrant. I presume that if they had convinced a judge of probable cause before they lojacked the suspect, they would have been in the clear.

    1. Re:Headline is inaccurate by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "It isn't that strange, state laws are anything but uniform."

      Nothing strange about it at all!! That's the way things are (supposed) to be set up. Rather than an all knowing all powerful federal govt. telling you what to do...the most power to make laws should be at the state and then local level. This is done in that state and local are more apt to serve their populations needs and wishes better. People living in NYC, and Tucson, AZ have vastly different needs and wishes due to climate, land mass, and culture of the people. You are a citizen of your state first, and then a citizen of the United States...

      It is great that way, in that if you don't like the laws and regulations where you live, you are free to move to a state that is more in line with your way of thinking. Wanna have medicinal pot easily? Move to CA. Things like that.

      Hehehe...if you think these laws are wide in variance....just look at liquor laws not only from state to state, but, from county to county (or parish to parish in LA)....those are the most fscked up things I've ever seen when traveling.

      But, what you observed isn't a bad thing or strange thing. The US was set up that way!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. What's the matter with these cops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't they just ask for a warrant, and not have to worry whether the case is going to be thrown out?

    If it's worth the trouble to track the guy for 65 days, surely it's worth the trouble to get a warrant.

  3. Re:That is a 1960's liberal mistake. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You go right ahead and live on the block where 10 guilty guys went free.

    Tell you what. I'll live with the criminals, and you live in the next town over where the cops can do whatever the hell they want. I guarantee you I'll have a longer, safer life than you will. What people like you never seem to understand is that when cops don't follow the law, they're no longer serving and protecting -- they're just the biggest, toughest, meanest gang on the street.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.