The More Popular the Browser, the Slower It Is
demishade writes "Peacekeeper, the browser benchmark from the makers of 3DMark, comes out of beta and shows an interesting (though perhaps not surprising) tidbit — the more popular a browser, the worse its performance. While it should not be surprising to anyone that IE slugs at the last place, the gap between Firefox and Chrome, is. Once IE's market share goes the way of the Dodo will web developers start cursing Firefox? How long until Google comes out with a JavaScript intensive application that will practically require Chrome to function?"
I have a Wii, and I have to spend hours masturbating before it finally ejaculates.
I could care less about the performance of javashit. It is almost universally used to annoy the user and only rarely to improve the user's experience.
So they didn't evaluate something with a feature it doesn't ahve yet.
Hay, they should ahve run them on the yet to be released 5Ghz 64Gig machine.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
His name is Philip K Dickhead, it doesn't matter if he opens his robe or not, you've seen too much.
However, if his dick is on his head, what is where his dick should be, his forehead?
"The value of NOT opening my robe to Google? Priceless!"
Since Google pays for several Firefox developers, how do you know you are not opening your robe to google?
Have you reviewed the code?
You could be bending over for Google.
If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
God I hope you're a paid shill, think you're helping the cause or this is some joke and you don't really believe the crap you're saying.
Dual Opteron < $600