Slashdot Mirror


Letting Time Solve the Online News Dilemma

The Guardian's John Naughton isn't looking to micro-transactions or licensing fees from search services to solve the online news business model problems that have come to a head recently. Instead, he's simply waiting for capitalism to do its job in killing off the providers who can't cut it. Once that happens, he says, the remaining organizations will be in a far better position to see what web-goers will pay for online news, and he doesn't think it will inhibit the growth of an increasingly information-rich news ecosystem. "Things have got so bad that Rupert Murdoch has tasked a team with finding a way of charging for News Corp content. This is the 'make the bastards pay' school of thought. Another group of fantasists speculate about ways of extorting money from Google, which they portray as a parasitic feeder on their hallowed produce. ... But what will journalism be like in the perfectly competitive online world? One clue is provided by the novelist William Gibson's celebrated maxim that 'the future is already here; it's just not evenly distributed.' In a recent lecture, the writer Steven Johnson took Gibson's insight to heart and argued that if we want to know what the networked journalism of the future might be like, we should look now at how the reporting of technology has evolved over the past few decades."

3 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Capitalism maximizes for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Any reasonable person listening to NPR would recognize the built in ideological slant to NPR.

    One listener to NOR said it best in a letter read on the air: "Gays, Aids, and Abortion". You are guaranteed to hear at least one story on one of these subjects every freaking day.

    Throw in a story about how wonderful (insert liberal politician here) is and how evil (Insert conservative politician here) is and then add some snooty, witty, and amusing story about some obscure idiot and there you have an NPR broadcast.

    NPR should have their government funds cut off. Let George Soros buy it.

  2. Re:Chicken and the Egg problem... by jez9999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Please don't turn to the BBC. They're horribly biased towards certain agendas, including banning drugs, banning guns, banning knives, socialist government, reduction of civil liberties, promotion of police power and (in the UK) populist claptrap.

  3. Re:Capitalism maximizes for profit by sycodon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    NPR debates usually consists of two liberals with differing viewpoints on how best the government can take care of a problem or how bad some Republican is.

    Occasionally they will have a debate between a liberal and a "moderate" who may even claim to be conservative, but "has seen the light".

    NPR is part of my commute radio station line up and I have yet to hear them host a debate featuring a real conservative (not some wimp ass Republican from the northeastern states). Of course, I may have missed it while running some hippie and his hybrid off the road with my truck.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.