Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM Pushing Water-Cooled Servers, Meeting Resistance

Posted by kdawson on from the let's-compromise-on-water-vapor dept.

judgecorp writes "IBM has said that water-cooled servers could become the norm in ten years. The company has lately been promoting wider user of the forty-year-old mainframe technology (e.g., here's a piece from April 2008), which allows faster clock speeds and higher processing power. But IBM now says water cooling is greener and more efficient, because it delivers waste heat in a form that's easier to re-use. They estimate that water can be up to 4,000 times more effective in cooling computer systems than air. However, most new data center designs tend to take the opposite approach, running warmer, and using free-air cooling to expend less energy in the first place. For instance, Dutch engineer Imtech sees no need for water cooling in its new multi-story approach which reduces piping and saves waste."

6 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What a waste of water! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    would be routed to a building-wide coffee...the community can get free coffee to boot.

    Is that a pun?
       

    --
    Table-ized A.I.
  2. Resistance by spectrokid · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they meet resistance, can't they just add some salt to the water?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:Resistance by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's because salt isn't the solution, it's the precipitate.

      _Ouch_. Please stop hitting me.

  3. Great working conditions... by yogibaer · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article: "We can use that to heat offices, or water for a swimming pool". Job Ad: "Wanted: Sysadmin, we offer: all year heated office (20+ C), swimming pool, Jacuzzi (body temperature) integrated coffe mug wamer in tabletop and always a nice, warm breeze from our datacenter." IBM could even use the swimming pool as a cooling tank (or is it the other way round?).

  4. Re:4000 times? by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where do people always get these kinds of numbers.

    this is a situation where a link to goatse would actually answer your question.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  5. Re:What a waste of water! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Self contained would imply no radiation / conduction / convection of the waste heat generated by the CPU.

    I agree. Any alternative interpretation - such as that it recirculates the water - is clearly preposterous.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."