IBM Pushing Water-Cooled Servers, Meeting Resistance
judgecorp writes "IBM has said that water-cooled servers could become the norm in ten years. The company has lately been promoting wider user of the forty-year-old mainframe technology (e.g., here's a piece from April 2008), which allows faster clock speeds and higher processing power. But IBM now says water cooling is greener and more efficient, because it delivers waste heat in a form that's easier to re-use. They estimate that water can be up to 4,000 times more effective in cooling computer systems than air. However, most new data center designs tend to take the opposite approach, running warmer, and using free-air cooling to expend less energy in the first place. For instance, Dutch engineer Imtech sees no need for water cooling in its new multi-story approach which reduces piping and saves waste."
I like to water-cool my balls.
Kids used to polish the radiator's on their cars...
Now get off my damn lawn!
Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
These days, Greenpeace is no better than PETA.
Only on slashdot could a topical second post (preceding a frosty piss troll) be marked as redundant...
I meet a guy the other day that asked if I wanted to join Greenpeace, I declined and he then asked if I would join PETA!
I presume that makes him a sleazy-nut-cultist.
The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
Greenpeace is sleazy, but PETA is a nut-cult.
Are those nuts water cooled?