Special Effects Lessons From JJ Abrams' Star Trek
brumgrunt writes "JJ Abram's hugely successful — on many levels — reboot of Star Trek has, for Den Of Geek, brought to the fore a lesson about special effects that many movie makers have been missing. Surely it's time now that special effects were actually used properly?" (The new film is not without some goofs, though only a few of the ones listed by Movie Mistakes' nitpickers are sciency.)
Even in a black hole there are too many lens flares.
better than "lens cap"! :-p
"goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
What's that then, when you move your lens in a particularly talented way?
Or did you mean flare?
"Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
What's that then, when you move your lens in a particularly talented way?
No, no, no. Lens Flair is the stuff you put on your lens to express yourself. I believe the minimum is 18 pieces.
Or my favorite: Why drill to the middle of the planet if you're about to create a black hole? Just make the black hole and let it do the rest.
(I suppose if all you have is a mining ship, every problem starts to seem like a drilling issue?)
I had always imagined Kirk was much more subtle
Shatner? Subtle??
"Seconded. I had to leave the theater due to vertigo (I've got nasty seasonal allergies and some blockage in my ears, I think)."
You left the new Star Trek... due to vertigo... caused by allergies...?
*hands you my Geek Card*
Yeah. You get TWO.
After all, in the Star Trek universe, the Earth is saved every other week. It's not such a big deal.