Slashdot Mirror


Google Tricycles To Map Footpaths For Street View

CNETNate writes "To advance its Street View service this summer, Google is poised to unleash the unstoppable power of human legs. Google will deploy pedal-powered tricycles — the company calls them 'Google Trikes' — mounted with 360 degree Street View cameras to map areas inaccessible by its fleet of Street View cars." The article indicates that the trikes will first see use in the UK, to map out public walking paths, but one anonymous commenter said: "This must be bogus — you are not allowed to cycle on public footpaths in the UK, I can't believe Google would have overlooked such a fundamental fact. Not to mention that the vehicle pictured wouldn't fit down most paths." PC World features the trikes in Rome.

6 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. I can just imagine by KingPin27 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With as much animosity as google street views has already been met with
    http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/02/1731231
    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/13/0055234
    I can just imagine what these guys riding around on bikes will meet up with - Can anyone say moving target?

    --
    "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
  2. Forget street view, how about decent maps by randomchicagomac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a bicyclist, I'd love it if google had decent maps of off-street bike paths, such that I could use google maps' normal direction-finding feature with these. I've lived in lots of cities with numerous such paths, and they're usually out of the way and hard to find if you don't already know that they're there. It would be great to have a feature that a) lets me find them, and b) tells me exactly how far out of my way I'd need to go for the added safety/pleasantness of using them.

  3. Re:Rights Do Not Scale Up by Drakin020 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The bigger you are, the less rights you should be entitled to.

    I'm sorry...What!?

    That has to be the most retarded comment I've ever heard. No one should be limited to rights just because of how "Big" they are.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  4. Google - OK! Gov't = Big Brother by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it ok in the public eye for google to do this, but when the gov't does this it's BigBrother and 1984 all over again?

  5. Re:Rights Do Not Scale Up by evanbd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think rights should scale up. I really don't see a problem with that.

    Oh, I see, you seem to have drunk the kool-aid and accepted that corporations are people who have rights. That's where the fault lies in all your examples, not with any inductive scaling.

    All that said... in this particular example, I do want my house on Google. Or, to be specific, I want other people's houses on Google -- many times I've made use of the Street View pictures to see what my destination will look like. And I can see other people wanting the same when I give them directions to my house. And I don't mind the pictures being up, and I certainly don't intend to take up a hypocritical position on the matter.

  6. Re:Good job kdawson! by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Put cameras on everyone's cats.... You'll get a lot more than a "street view".....

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/