Slashdot Mirror


Space Station Crew Drinks Recycled Urine

An anonymous reader writes "After the astronauts on the International Space Station finished up their communications with Space Shuttle Atlantis yesterday, the crew on the Space Station did something that no other astronaut has ever done before — drank recycled urine and sweat. The previous shuttle crew that recently returned to Earth brought back samples of the recycled water to make sure it was safe to drink, and all tests came back fine. So on Wednesday, the crew took their recycled urine and said 'cheers' together and toasted the researches and scientists that made the Urine Recycler possible. After drinking the water, they said the taste was great! They also said the water came with labels on it that said 'drink this when real water is over 200 miles away.'"

4 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nonsense. by Forge · · Score: 4, Informative

    True. We also drink recycled Blood, vomit, pus and other miscellaneous bodily fluids.

    For those who read/watched Dune, the fremins just do in minutes with a machine what nature dose for us in months with sunlight.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  2. Re:Nonsense. by Cyrano+de+Maniac · · Score: 5, Informative

    > Everyone drinks recycled urine and sweat every day.

    While a good point, this may not be quite as true in the case of the astronauts aboard ISS.

    A large portion of the water delivered to ISS comes from the Space Shuttle as it combusts liquid hydrogen to power itself while docked. Depending on the source of the liquid hydrogen and oxygen fuel (i.e. Is it generated from electrolysis of water? Condensed directly from the atmosphere? etc), it's possible a significant portion of their water supply has never been urine or sweat before.

    And even if the liquid hydrogen and oxygen was water previously, do water molecules generated from hydrogen combustion really count as "recycled"?

    -- CdM

    --
    Cyrano de Maniac
  3. Re:How does that make it not "real water"? by MagicM · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no such thing as "real Coca-Cola". Or if there is, the majority of what goes for "Coca-Cola" isn't "real Coca-Cola".

    Coca-Cola is created from concentrate or syrup. This concentrate is shipped to bottlers who add their own sweetners and other additives, which causes local variations. Then it is combined with water from different sources, causing even more variations. Coca-Cola, even in a can or bottle, tastes differently all over the place.

    Then add to that the abomination that is fountain-based Coca-Cola, which is syrup mixed with carbonated tap water. This means that the Coca-Cola from your local city-water-fed McDonald's tastes differently from the Coca-Cola served in the well-water-fed McDonald's just out of town.

    You should count yourself lucky if you've ever had two servings of Coca-Cola that tasted the same.

    </rant type="pet peeve">

  4. Re:Nonsense. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's an interesting piece on the rise of cesarian section delivery written by New Yorker staff writer and active surgeon Atul Gawande, where he claims and shows evidence that c-section replaced forceps delivery because forceps delivery required experience, skill, and physical dexterity, while c-section could be taught by rote, essentially. His underlying thesis is that a mass-production system of doctoring means everyone will get basically the same level of quality of care, rather than having some superstars and some real duds. But in the meantime, it's become so routine, and so highly practiced, that it's rapidly approaching parity with natural childbirth, as regards complications to mother and child, and he thinks at some point it'll be considered the default method for childbirth.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.