Slashdot Mirror


Original Cast On Board For Ghostbusters 3

bowman9991 writes "Dan Aykroyd reveals that all the original cast have now signed on for Ghostbusters 3, including Sigourney Weaver, Bill Murray, Harold Ramis and Ernie Hudson. Apparently Bill Murray, who holds a one-fifth controlling interest, was very reluctant at first, not even willing to read a third draft of Aykroyd's script. Aykroyd would like to see Ivan Reitman or Harold Ramis direct, wants to introduce a 'new generation' of Ghostbusters, and believes they could be filming the new Ghostbuster movie by winter."

26 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. Gee by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope its as good as Blues Brothers 2000.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Gee by Zouden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't wait to see who they're going to cast as the annoying kid ghostbuster, complete with mini-backpack.

      I hear Jessica Biel is going to play the kick-ass female ghostbuster who doesn't take crap from nobody - but is she falling for the hunky new ghostbuster (Shia LaBeouf)?

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    2. Re:Gee by Grimbleton · · Score: 5, Funny

      DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS.

    3. Re:Gee by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hear Jessica Biel is going to play the kick-ass female ghostbuster who doesn't take crap from nobody - but is she falling for the hunky new ghostbuster (Shia LaBeouf)?

      Make it R-rated with Lindsay Lohan falling for the kick-ass female ghostbuster and I'll go see it! Or at least download it from the pirate-bay!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:Gee by dargon · · Score: 5, Informative
  2. Can we by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm all for Ghostbusters 3, but I don't understand this idea to put the original cast in it. They left Schwarzenegger out of Terminator 4 for a reason. Harrison Ford looked like a bad casting job in the latest Indiana Jones.

    Seeing a bunch of guys in their 60s doing action/adventure stuff won't cut it for me, I don't think. It's just a mis-match of the phases of human life and the plot of the story. Running around doing crazy shit is a young person's thing; a story where the cast is middle-aged should have the plot that involves the drama that a middle aged person gets involved in -- kids, grandkids, getting old, missed opportunities, rectifying relationships, taking on responsiblities, coming to terms with your life, etc.

    I think the baby boomers represented the great consumerist generation, and the marketers are trying to squeeze the last dollars out of this demographic.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Can we by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You really considered the original ghostbusters movies action adventure flicks?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Can we by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either we have very different definitions of "crazy shit" or your seven year old does way too much booze and drugs for his age.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    3. Re:Can we by Kamokazi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree with you for Indiana and Terminator, Ghostbusters is different. It's a comedy/action movie. Who the hell can replace Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd?

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    4. Re:Can we by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the new Pink Panther movies are any guide, nobody.

    5. Re:Can we by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Funny

      your son is way too young to be running around with an unlicensed nuclear accelerator strapped to his back

    6. Re:Can we by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe the original cast could be the ghosts.

      Besides, Ghostbusters isn't really an action film. It's a comedy with some effects.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:Can we by GaryOlson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who the hell can replace Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd?

      Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker? Chris tucker distracts Cuthulu with a continuous rant on Cuthulu's personal hygene and Jackie stunt fights thru the reanimated denizens of the Netherworld in a proton accelerated tuxedo.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    8. Re:Can we by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know, it ended with some kind of lightning battle with an interdimensional god and a giant Stay Puft marshmallow man on the New York skyline... what category does that normally go in?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:Can we by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know, it ended with some kind of lightning battle with an interdimensional god and a giant Stay Puft marshmallow man on the New York skyline... what category does that normally go in?

      Acid Trip.

    10. Re:Can we by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Hey none of us are getting gigs, let's do a remake!"

      Yeah, they are all just desperate for work...

      Just take Bill Murray for example. In the past 5 years he's only got 12 projects listed on the Internet Movie Database

      Including :

      The Darjeeling Limited 67% fresh on Rotton Tomatoes

      The City of Ember

      Get Smart

      Broken Flowers 87% fresh

      The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou

      That's a struggling actor not getting gigs?

      Sigourney Weaver? Bah, she only has 18 film projects listed since 2004. And lots of TV gigs. LOTS. That's hardly working in the world of LA actors though, right? Oh.

      Harold Ramis? Well, he's sure slowed down in his writing, but he's been acting a little (Knocked Up,Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, etc), a little producing, a little directing (a few episodes of The Office, etc). It looks like he's picking and choosing and having fun, not really struggling for projects.

    11. Re:Can we by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Burn. In. Hell.

    12. Re:Can we by iJusten · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're going to resurrect him in the sequel. After all, he's the most popular guy in the franchise.

      --
      Chronologically late.
    13. Re:Can we by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That last sentence, was just not something I would like to hear at a funeral.

      I can understand why you feel you would not want to hear that. The lady (and she was) certainly knew my sister wouldn't be able to handle it but somehow figured out that I would enjoy hearing it. Perhaps it was that I had flown in from several thousand miles away and she knew we would almost certainly never meet again. Perhaps it was because she was in shock - too long a story to explain why but she only found out about his death and funeral the day before the service - and grieving and it helped her cope with that grief to be able to share it.

      I think she knew it would help me. My father had grown up in the Great Depression (and anybody who thinks the current situation is anywhere near as bad as that is deluded). His father died before he was 10. He fought on the ground in WWII and saw things he would never discuss with me or anyone else. In action his back was injured and he suffered chronic pain and reduced mobility for the next 30 years. His fighter pilot brother crashed and burned somewhere over Europe during WWII. As a result his mother killed herself. He was in a loveless and painful marriage to my mother and stayed in it until my sister and I were both out of the home. He supported his family by working in a job he literally came to hate long before he could leave it when my sister and I were gone. Mom had worked once my sister and I were in school, and was fully capable of supporting herself, but when he left her he gave up everything - house, furniture, car etc. - and paid Mom support in order to make sure Mom didn't go without - all without a court or lawyer forcing him. Medicine had advanced and he got his back fixed and at age 55 started over with nothing.

      A lot of what that means you don't get until you are older and can really start to understand. One of my favorite sayings goes something like "When I was a teenager I was always embarrassed at how completely ignorant and stupid my father was. In my late twenties I was shocked to see how much smarter he had become." Despite all that he lived through Dad was a gentle and scrupulously honest man who thought about right and wrong and tried to live his life by that. Hundreds of people came to his funeral including people he had worked with and mentored 30 years before.

      I was really glad to see my Dad able to find some happiness and joy in the latter part of his life. If anyone deserved it he sure did and I had been telling his girlfriend this because she had been worried how the family might react to finding out about her. I think part of why she told me what she did was to let me know what he had found with her. And what's the big deal? They'd had sex. They were naked. He got on his hands and knees to pick something up and spur of the moment she playfully got on his back. They played and they had fun... hearing about that made me happy.

      I understand your desire not to hear that and it is certainly your right and nothing wrong with that at all. So none of this is aimed at you but some of the other reactions involving knives and "brain bleach" betray a serious problem - with age, with sex, with parents... I don't know which - maybe all. But the people saying stuff like that really ought to examine why they have such reactions. It's said nobody likes to think of their parents or teachers as having sex. Why? They are, after all, completely human. Even if they are gasp old.

      Many people here think nothing of saying things like "put it in retard mode for the senior citizens" and other similar comments. The bigotry aimed at age is no more acceptable than if it was aimed at race. If anything it is worse because those old people have lived and experienced far more than the bigots and they deserve respect. They used to get it in our society and it's ugly that that has, for some reason, changed.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  3. A poltergeist stole my dentures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ghostbusters 3: Haunted Retirement Community

  4. Please, please, do NOT.... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please, don't let the 'new generation of Ghostbusters' consist of a goth girl, a hispanic guy, a guy in a wheelchair, and black mechanic.

  5. Speak for yourself, Sonny by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Iron Man was great because it gave 40-somethings an action hero *THEY* can relate to.

    Not your typical, whiny, prissy-haired Generation-Y superhero who between fighting bad guys (like "Eco Man" and "The Recycler") shops and uses his iPhone to update his Twitter feed: "kckd butt yo lol lawl in4a!"

    If GhostBusters 3 gives 60-somethings an action hero they can relate to (Because Indy 4 sure as hell didn't), good for them!

  6. Re:Does hollywood have any originality left? by mosherkl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    C'mon. At least of the 6 major Batman movies, 4 of them were decent or good (I'm sorry, but Batman & Robin and Batman Forever SUCKED!). Did you even SEE The Dark Knight? Hardly slapping on a fresh coat of paint and slapping it up there. And nevermind that Batman Begins WAS basically a "reboot" for the franchise.

    And it's not necessarily originality that's lacking in Hollywood. It's the fact that original, high profile, big budget pictures tend to elicit quite a following if they're at least decent, and this causes sequels to be "big" as well simply because people who liked the first (or second, or tenth) will come see the next simply out of curiousity. Repeat ad nauseum.

  7. reboot by cstacy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The phone rings and a desperate call, but the team is already engaged and Rick Moranis is left to answer the call. Attempting to prove himself worthy of being a Ghostbuster, he goes alone to encounter a demon who sends him back in time several years before the original Gozer encounter. Rick does get some action with Sigourney Weaver this time, but some other things go horribly wrong. But there is plenty of action and special effects, and by the end of the movie the team is formed albeit with some slight changes. Ghostbusters Headquarters looks like the Apple Store. Complete with Macbook Pros. And lens flare. Lots of lens flare.

  8. Re:Last by innocence18 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Excellent reasoning...

    Just like George Lucas had "reasonable" success. He'd certainly earned enough money that he didn't need to do the Star Wars prequels. So the fact that he did them is part of the reason they were so...hang on...something is wrong with this train of thought

    --
    Anonymity of the internet is responsible for the views expressed in my post.
  9. Re:Last by bogjobber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bill Murray went through a terrible divorce last year where he lost a significant amount of his wealth. And sure, he was in Rushmore, Lost in Translation, Broken Flowers, etc. but he we also the voice of Garfield. So it's not like he's above taking a big, fat paycheck to make a turd.