Slashdot Mirror


What to Do With a $99 Wall Wart Linux Server

Guanine writes in with a follow-up to our discussion a few months back on the SheevaPlug: 1.2-GHz ARM-compliant processor, 512 MB DDR2, 512 MB flash, USB 2.0, gigabit ethernet, in a package the size of a wall wart, for $99. Saul Hansell's Bits Blog in the NY Times talks about a few applications for such a device, whose price point Hansell claims will drop to $40 before too long. "The first plausible use for the plug computer is to attach one of these gizmos to a USB hard drive. Voila, you've got a network server. Cloud Engines, a startup, has in fact built a $99 plug computer called Pogoplug, that will let you share the files on your hard drive, not only in your home but also anywhere on the Internet. ... [Marvell's CEO said] 'Eventually you won't see the plug. We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.'"

10 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't really see the revolution here - it's a small headless server. A bit like an NSLU2 only a lot faster. They're pretty cool.

    They also seem to suffer from dodgy NAND memory, which is a shame, and booting from SDHC is not yet very well supported. That said, they come with Ubuntu server pre-installed and it was trivial to turn it into a media server.

  2. One application I would go for by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have it run either skype or magicjack. I have heard that the second is planning to support Linux "soon". I would definitely be more interested in cheap phone service at home if it didn't require me to have a desktop computer on whenever I wanted to make a call.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  3. Sensors & Home Automation by Vytalon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking of using it for monitoring and control in a smart house type environment. I there are several company making USB sensor packages and relay controls. I found some with Linux support at phidgets.com. You could have a full set of sensor in key room and relays to control lighting or fans.

    --
    Let some one use your computer and they will use it for the day. Give or sell some one a computer and you will be tech s
  4. Combine with other technology and enjoy by meist3r · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hook up an external hard-drive or NAS and one of those USB displays http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9676037801.html to create something like this: http://technewsline.net/displaylink-for-linux-turns-a-humble-wireless-router-into-a-beautiful-pc/. I'd build myself a nice BitTorrent client for which I don't have to leave my computer on all the time. Other than that I'd use those as fileservers and for routing/processing duties. Any bets on when the first Beowulf wall cluster will emerge?

  5. Could this save power? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our current home network setup has my wife and I primarily using laptops. Our printer, however, is shared out by a desktop computer upstairs. The desktop computer also acts as a file server. (For example, keeping years' worth of photos that we wouldn't keep on the individual laptops.) While the monitor is shut off unless the desktop computer is actively being used (rarely), we would definitely save power by turning the desktop computer off. This would mean, however, that we would need to go upstairs and turn it on whenever we wanted to print or retrieve a file.

    I wonder how much energy these wall wart servers draw. If it's less than a standard desktop PC (which I build back in 2002), then it might be worth it to buy one, hook up a large USB HDD and the printer and share those out. Anyone know if this is possible (laptop & desktop computers currently run Windows XP)? If it is possible, any ideas how much power (if any) I would save?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  6. I wonder if USB monitors work with it by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    you can get USB touch screens for (not cheap), but If you could tie a 7" USB touch screen to this device, you'd be able to create something that you can plug into almost any room and use for browsing, chat (rudimentary due to touch screen), and other very basic tasks.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  7. Scanner server by Doug+Neal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm planning to try making one of these into a scanner server. It could potentially turn any plain old USB scanner into a network-attached scanner, using the vast array of SANE drivers available.

    Initially it should be very easy just to run an instance of saned, which lets SANE frontends talk to the backend over a TCP socket. A more ambitious project would be to combine the SheevaPlug with a web-based SANE frontend... the only one I could find was phpSANE but it seems to be a dead project...

  8. Logitech Duet by jackflap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Install NFS/Samba or whatever, mount a network drive from a NAS to it and then install Logitech's SqueezeCentre software so that the Logitech Duet can play tracks from your NAS rather than a PC.

  9. A secure personal network by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    VPN'd to all your friends and family.

    Cruciall feature being trivial vpn config support.

     

    --
    Deleted
  10. X-10 gone wild by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First accessory I'd want for a smart wall-wart would be powerline networking (that works, unlike X-10 that seems to be about 99% reliable, which is crap when it's open loop.) The next most obvious accessories include things like:
    • relay switching / dimming of the power line for lamp control, simple appliance control
    • An LED "night light" that could also convey information
    • A motion sensor
    • Microphone / speaker for intercom / VOIP functions
    • Temp sensors for room by room environmental data (and subsequent control of HVAC diverters / thermostat)
    • Battery power backup

    Problem is that most of these functions would be happy without their own local CPU, but if the CPUs do drop below the $50 price point, it could be feasible to just have local CPUs anyway for data integrity, local signal processing, autonomous operation in the event of network failure, etc.

    Did it strike anyone else as lame that the MIT dude said he'd have it run a spam filter?