Slashdot Mirror


Internet Giving Rise To "Citizen Spies"

reporter writes "According to a startling report by the Wall Street Journal, the Internet has empowered ordinary people to be part-time intelligence officers, uncovering secrets like military facilities and prison camps across the landscape of North Korea. The report states, '[Curtis] Melvin is at the center of a dozen or so citizen snoops who have spent the past two years filling in the blanks on the map of one of the world's most secretive countries. Seeking clues in photos, news reports and eyewitness accounts, they affix labels to North Korean structures and landscapes captured by Google Earth, an online service that stitches satellite pictures into a virtual globe. The result is an annotated North Korea of rocket-launch sites, prison camps and elite palaces on white-sand beaches. "It's democratized intelligence," says Mr. Melvin. More than 35,000 people have downloaded Mr. Melvin's file, North Korea Uncovered. It has grown to include thousands of tags in categories such as "nuclear issues" (alleged reactors, missile storage), dams (more than 1,200 countrywide) and restaurants (47). Its Wikipedia approach to spying shows how Soviet-style secrecy is facing a new challenge from the Internet's power to unite a disparate community of busybodies.'"

93 comments

  1. In Soviet Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Citizens spy on you?

    *ducks*

    1. Re:In Soviet Internet by asdfx · · Score: 1

      does it not sound problematic that if we can do this, so can they...?

    2. Re:In Soviet Internet by gnick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what? Security through obscurity has pretty well been written off. We used to identify Russian special-nuclear-material sites by looking for the buildings with 3-layer fences and sniper towers. Our sites are identifiable the same way. Solution? 3-layer fences, sniper towers, and undisclosed underground protection. You can no longer hide your facilities, you just protect them and keep anything super-sensitive under a closed roof in a building with no open windows.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:In Soviet Internet by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Citizens spy on you?

      Ah, just like old times. Since there's absolutely no way to stop the phenomenon, why don't we balance things out? Let the citizens spy on the government as well.

    4. Re:In Soviet Internet by Psyborgue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah. The government has nothing to hide. There is plenty of oversight. Trust them!

    5. Re:In Soviet Internet by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Of course, when these are located in the UK or US?

      You are a paranoid tin-foil hatter.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    6. Re:In Soviet Internet by Whiternoise · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or, like most top secret installations these days, you dig and avoid the problem entirely. Facilities like NORAD, for instance (and you think if anything has ever existed at Area 51 it's above ground?).

      The UK (and no doubt the US and similar) government employs researchers with the sole task of poring over satellite pictures to determine the capacity of power plants, populations of regions and in general "what things are and what they can do". They also have far more high resolution satellite images than Google is allowed to produce.

      We've been doing this kind of thing for years and still are. The only difference now is that the public can give it a go.

      Reminds me of the famous incident concerning one of the first Nuclear tests when a university professor used dimensional analysis to calculate what the detonation payload was (a classified figure at the time) based on a photo that was published in the papers (that was the last time the US Military put scales on their photos :P).

    7. Re:In Soviet Internet by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >So what? Security through obscurity has pretty well been written off.

      Just when I started to believe that, I had three different system administrators tell me to put SSH on a nonstandard port in response to dictionary attacks. Of course that buys you a few seconds maybe, but the bots are smart enough to nmap and find sshd running wherever you put it. My plan was to (hardware) firewall the host so that it only allowed specific source addresses and to disable passwords entirely. One of those admins, a service provider, was too lazy to use key authentication and whined about it. I wasn't impressed.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:In Soviet Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      > You are a paranoid tin-foil hatter.

      You say that like its a bad thing....

    9. Re:In Soviet Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to facility in the UK, check out the big double fences and the armed guards at the gates. The regular security patrols, the patrol dogs. The level of security usually depends on the current alert level, posted on a sign near the gate as you enter.

      Then find a site with something that needs keeping genuinely secure, and behind the above "friendly" outer fence, significantly further into the base, you will also find another secure fence that looks even less friendly.

      These areas are normally quite a way inside a normal security base, away from prying eyes, and giving some warning if there is a security issue at the main gate or fences.

      Neither are surprising though - installations do need to be guarded.

    10. Re:In Soviet Internet by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      They don't have agents in Google faking the maps (or launching the spy satellites).

      Or do they?

  2. Oh Boy by cbs4385 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean I get to act out my favorite moments from 24 on that creepily suspicious neighbor of mine, the one who speaks that foreigner lingo in with his so call family? I can't wait. Now where'd I put my home waterboarding kit...

    1. Re:Oh Boy by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      the one who speaks that foreigner lingo in with his so call family?

      Depends on it being more or less foreign than your "lingo". :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  3. Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by redelm · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There's a _huge_ difference between people on the ground who go look at things and talk to people, and people who analyse the photos people on the ground or in the sky/space have taken.

    For one thing, analysts aren't in hostile territory and subject to arrest.

    1. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by nametaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, my initial thought was, aren't there LOTS of people who work for our intelligence agencies doing this with much better imagery and expertise, augmented by feet on the ground?

    2. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by ickleberry · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True. You're not a real spy unless you build a UAV and fly it over North Korea, or a MAV if you have the balls (or a death wish).

      It would be a fun project, launch it from Russia or South Korea - not China because NK & China are good communist brothers. You can have it connect to the interwebs using Thuraya, Inmarsat and maybe use an Orbcomm transceiver as backup. I suppose ideally you'd want a dirigible or something that can stay in the air for extended periods without producing much heat that missiles would pick up on. Once in the country's interior you could lower its altitude and get some nice detailed shots. You could control it directly by radio but this makes you far too easy to trace - internet connectivity allows you to GTFO once the thing is launched.

      The problem would be getting something to power the thing - microjets pump out too much heat, solar power alone probably won't give you the required amount of oomph to fly the thing. You could go unpowered, launch when there is a good breeze blowing into North Korea and deflate once it reaches another country. There was a slashdot story about a bunch of students who made something similar but I don't think they ever flew it over North Korea

    3. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You're not a real spy unless you build a UAV and fly it over North Korea, or a MAV if you have the balls (or a death wish).

      Still not a spy. The intelligence community has lots of members with different roles. Spies are the ones who go in and talk to the people. Unless you shake the hand of the enemy (or whatever their culture does), you're not a spy.

    4. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think it would be more interesting to let it fly over the USA. ^^
      I'll start it from the UK, because they are good brothers too.

      Man, I bet you could unite 99% of the people of NK, Iran, and the USA, and they would work well together.
      Why not just dump the government of all those states on the moon, and let them annihilate each other?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Like the governments of Europe did to organize the greatest mass slaughter of humankind in history? You self-righteous Europeans crack me up, you people are by FAR the biggest mass-murderers in history and yet you pretend to be all high and mighty and condemn other nations who don't do killing nearly as efficient as Europe.

    6. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 0

      This sounds like fealgood uselessness to me, surely the real spies will just be able to use use an automated system to analyze the boundary of camps. I suspect nobody has had the heart to tell the guy that his efforts are pretty redundant or worse counter productive.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    7. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by j.+andrew+rogers · · Score: 1

      I suppose ideally you'd want a dirigible or something that can stay in the air for extended periods without producing much heat that missiles would pick up on.

      Modern missiles use imaging-based terminal guidance, not heat seeking. The imagers often work into the infrared spectrum, but that is primarily to give better all-weather performance. If they can pick up your dirigible on radar, they can put a missile in your area that can find you.

    8. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by Omnifarious · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you're not a real spy until you actually become a part of the North Korean military in order to report on what it's up to and what kind of orders you're getting.

      Our intelligence agencies have lost their edge precisely because they don't want to do that kind of thing. But that's what real spies do and where useful intelligence comes from.

      And citizens could get involved in this if there were people who lived in North Korea wanted to do something horribly risky because they wanted to make their government look bad. I actually hope the Internet does spawn this kind of spying.

    9. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Still not a spy. The intelligence community has lots of members with different roles. Spies are the ones who go in and talk to the people. Unless you shake the hand of the enemy (or whatever their culture does), you're not a spy.

      Does it count if the enemy recoils in fear after feeling your metallic handshake?

    10. Re:Not _SPIES_, intel analysts by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      A helium balloon with control valves and maybe directional sails, or some such thing would do the job nicely. IE, a 'weather balloon'. Depending on air currents you could launch it quite a far ways off.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  4. You too can be James Bond by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    The miniturization and degree of complexity in today's modern electronics, combined with price drops from affordable generic knock-offs of premium items makes it now possible to equip yourself like James Bond after a Q-Branch sequence with little more than a shoestring budget and a Best Buy online account.

    1. Re:You too can be James Bond by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think this newfounding spying power would be mainly limited to Google Earth. Walking around in an oppressive regime with ultra-miniaturized electronics can often draw great suspicion.

  5. best definition yet by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its Wikipedia approach to spying shows how Soviet-style secrecy is facing a new challenge from the Internet's power to unite a disparate community of busybodies

    Wikipedia: a disparate community of busybodies. Yep, pretty much the best definition I've heard.

    But lets hope the quality of these citizen intelligence officers is vastly superior to the average wikipedian. Using wikipedia-based information might get you a fail mark, a libel suit, minor injuries, or a variety of other personal problems. However, using poor intelligence information might get us all nuked, or start a major war. (citation: see Iran, Weapons of Mass destruction, intelligence failure thereof)

    1. Re:best definition yet by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I think Iraq rather than Iran.

      We still don't really know what Iran are up to. Or is that what you meant?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    2. Re:best definition yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might get you a fail mark, a libel suit, minor injuries, or a variety of other personal problems.

      Mr. Melvin should be starting to watch out for the infamous spiky umbrella-man. Those radiating restaurant meals are also a killer. Poisonous chocolate milkshakes are not so much of a concern, however. It's not of their style. Too American.

    3. Re:best definition yet by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 1

      The problem with Wikipedia isn't badly edited content. It's poorly informed readers.

      A Wikipedia article is only as good as the sources it cites, and anyone intending to do anything important according to information in a Wikipedia article should be aware of that.

    4. Re:best definition yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true moron who knows nothing about bomb making. If you can enrich the uranium for civilian reactor use you can easily make weapons-grade uranium. If you can make weapons-grade uranium it's easy to make a bomb.

      The question is not what Iran is up to. The question is what can Iran do. Or more specifically, do you want Iran to have a bomb?

      I don't know enough about politics to tell you the answer to that. I image Iran with a bomb wouldn't change much. Perhaps the US and Israel would stop talking about using force against Iran.

    5. Re:best definition yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We still don't really know what Iran are up to."

      They're acquiring nuclear material. What is good about that?

      If you are a liberal, at least hold Iran up to the same standard you hold your own country to--no more nuclear plants, no more nuclear material, no real government funded nuclear research (particularly on closed cycle), no risk of nuclear proliferation. You are largely against nuclear energy because of the risks, hold Iran to the same. It's always amazing to me the number of time I've heard the "EU is doing it" argument, but folks largely ignore what the EU isn't doing too. Thankfully, the EU ineptitude and complacency on this means the issue is closer thome to them; they didn't learn from the Cold War.

      If you are a conservative, you know damn well nuclear refining for power plants means the same technology can be applied directly to nuclear weapon refining. They may not be building nuclear weapons today, but they have that immediate potential to do so oday, no matter what our government nitwits want to say. People continue to say they don't have the capability or capacity right now; this doesn't matter. Nuclear proliferation isn't simply about building an actual weapon. It's about garnering the research, education, and learning about the process, which Iran has shown it can do and thus can proliferate the knowledge and expertise right now.

      The fact is, the US doesn't have the will or the brainpower to tackle the Iranian issue. The Iranian government and religious leadership knows this. The US government and nation doesn't. It's why Iran IS a nuclear power today; anyone that says or thinks "well, maybe..." is just naive.

    6. Re:best definition yet by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Way to stereotype me into two extreme ends of the US political spectrum when I'm not even a Yank. I am a liberal (classical/European), I also believe in the necessity of nuclear power. There is nothing contradictory about this at all. Note that France is something like 80% nuclear powered, hardly your flag-bearing conservative nation (though not liberal in the sense that I am). So I don't believe there's anything wrong with Iran wanting to build nuke power plants. I can also understand their worries about sovereignty, given the way the world has treated Iran in the past. And the fact that you think Iran is a major threat to Europe at the moment is touching but at least demonstrates that you must be American, with that kind of grasp of geography.

      Finally, you may think that Europe is inept and complaisant, but that's rich coming from a power which still won't even talk to Iran out of a prolonged ideological hissy-fit. We even came damn close to a solution until your Bush regime blocked it.

      Incidentally, if you think there's still time to prevent the Iranians getting the brainpower, education and the research together then you obviously don't know how many have trained in top European and American universities.

      For a better idea of Iran than you'll get from the Fox channel I suggest the Economist, the BBC's excellent series on Iran and the West of the same name and, god forbid, some Iranians.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    7. Re:best definition yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. You dont know enough about politics.

  6. further proof that the open source model works by n0tquitesane · · Score: 1

    With a million eyeballs, no restaurant can remain hidden

    1. Re:further proof that the open source model works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're suggesting that NK has thousands of nuclear sites, but less than fifty places to eat?

    2. Re:further proof that the open source model works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that so hard to believe?

    3. Re:further proof that the open source model works by n0tquitesane · · Score: 1

      Have you noticed they are starving there?

  7. Some books on the subject by hughperkins · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Some books on the subject by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      The Light of Other Days, by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter would make a good addition to that list. It's a worthwhile read; the summary on Wikipedia really doesn't do it justice, IMO (and I'm too lazy to change it right now).

    2. Re:Some books on the subject by Eil · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there.

  8. Slashdot spreading fear mongering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot spreading fear mongering.

  9. And what of other "open" countries? by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder what kind of trouble you'd get in if you made a similarly detailed map of all military installations (secret or otherwise) in the US or the UK.

    Considering the oproar over showing where schools, churches and Cheney's residence are, I wouldn't be surprised if it was more difficult to get it done for the US than for North Korea ...

    1. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      None? At least in the U.S.

      Head on over to Google Maps and start looking up things like Bangor, WA, which is a major Trident Nuclear Sub base. Feel free to explore both the street map and the satellite view to compare.
      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=bangor,+wa&sll=44.662793,-68.720169&sspn=0.363355,0.892639&ie=UTF8&ll=47.715537,-122.739601&spn=0.085929,0.22316&t=h&z=13

      Notice what Microsoft's mapping gathered from there? Oopsie!
      http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/09/04/microsofts-mapping-service-uncovers-top-secret-us-submarine/

      Maybe browse a website dedicated to secret U.S. military bases?
      http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Bases.html

      The U.S. and the rest of the world, especially the major powers, have dealt with satellite overviews since the 1960s. Anything real interesting is underground and out of view.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. and the rest of the world, especially the major powers, have dealt with satellite overviews since the 1960s. Anything real interesting is underground and out of view.

      This is true for North Korea as well.

    3. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by zm · · Score: 1
      --
      Sig ?
    4. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Head on over to Google Maps and start looking up things like Bangor, WA, which is a major Trident Nuclear Sub base. Feel free to explore both the street map and the satellite view to compare.

      Having spent a lot of time at Bangor, I can say with confidence that being able to see the base, and knowing in any kind of detail what goes on there are two very different things.
       
       

      The U.S. and the rest of the world, especially the major powers, have dealt with satellite overviews since the 1960s. Anything real interesting is underground and out of view.

       
      Nah. The real interesting stuff takes place in banal looking buildings that don't appear any different from the ones around them. The most interesting building at Bangor looks like a warehouse - one of several in the complex.

    5. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Informative

      Granted, but it's not like we've never heard or seen Bangor naval base before. Or Area 51. Or any of the other major military installations.

      But what exactly is being hidden here?

      A ~25 x 3 mile black strip in Canada and Alaska ...

    6. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Could be just a glitch when the camera responsible was gathering stuff.

      --
    7. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nothing. It was a camera glitch. Notice, because Alaska isn't high priority, that all levels of zoom are from the same photo set? Watch the clouds, they never move.

      Then check other sources like Microsoft's Virtual Earth and see what is "hidden".

      http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCP&cp=62.244908~-141.222382&style=h&lvl=12&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by ilyag · · Score: 1

      Try zooming in - you see a swamp. So, if something is hidden there,
      it must have been very temporary...

    9. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Palin just didn't want anyone to see satellite pix of her hunting moose with grenades.

    10. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Easier.

      And remember, whet you now need is a vast army of busybodies prepared to pore over maps continually. Which China has in abundance....

    11. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Nah. The real interesting stuff takes place in banal looking buildings that don't appear any different from the ones around them. The most interesting building at Bangor looks like a warehouse - one of several in the complex.

      But the same thing holds true for other countries as well. And in a closed country like N. Korea, it'll be much more difficult to separate sensitive facilities from the others. Everything is 'sensitive'. Nobody can get in on the ground to take a look around easily.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Nothing. Here and here are two different areas in the black rectangle at highers levels of zoom, plainly showing the terrain.
       
      Nothing to see, move along, just another of Google Map's many glitches.

    13. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that made my day: Microsoft just told me to install Firefox (well, IE or Firefox). I use Iceweasel (Debian's rebranded Firefox).

    14. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by cffrost · · Score: 1

      That's the Exxon petroleum ditch, created during the cleanup of the Valdez oil spill.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    15. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where we stash our weed man!

    16. Re:And what of other "open" countries? by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      I have some friends who are street car "nuts". They like to go to different cities and take pictures of street cars. They were informed while they were taking pictures of street cars (I think it was in New England) that they were violating a federal law by taking the pictures. The policeman was *SERIOUS*. They do this for their own enjoyment and they give talks at various "clubs" on street cars.
      They are *NOT* foreign agents or out to give aid to the "enemy" (whoever that is). This whole idea of the US government intervening in purely information building effort to write a book on street cars is way over the top. The Bush people(and their new laws) have done so much damage to the national mindset and liberties has got to stop.

  10. Cool but mildly creepy. by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    On one side it is cool how proliferation of information is creating transparency in areas previously shrouded with secrecy, on the other side it is somewhat creepy to see how it is becoming increasingly more acceptable to out things without the involved party's consent. Are we evolving into info junkies, who under the guise of "The Public Has The Right To Know" are simply feeding our addiction to sticking our noses into everyone's business? I admit that I am addicted to information (duh I am on /.), but I do not like to think of myself as a Peeping Tom. Sorry, its early in the morning and the caffeine is slowly working through my system, I must ponder this some more....

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  11. AI glider? by mangu · · Score: 1

    You could go unpowered, launch when there is a good breeze blowing into North Korea and deflate once it reaches another country

    Or you could make a glider with AI or remote control. Perhaps an infrared camera on a glider would help it find thermal columns? Gliders piloted by humans have flown over 3000 km, I wonder how much a remote control glider could do.

  12. Keep this story in mind by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Keep this story in mind the next time you hear about "China" hacking DoD computers - we don't know whether or not the govt. is behind hacks from a given country, assuming the attacks even originate from there, it could just be bored geeks in their mom's basements.

    And keep this story in mind the next time an "American" (they always turn out to be dual citizens) is arrested for spying in Iran or China - we don't know whether a US citizen has been doing some un-sanctioned spying on another country. Even if they're not on the CIA payroll, it could be business interests, it could be family ties, it could be a grudge, and after reading this story I realize it could just be flat out idle curiosity?

    1. Re:Keep this story in mind by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      Or they could just be an innocent citizen arrested by the secret police of a totalitarian state that denies freedom to its own people?

      Just a thought.

    2. Re:Keep this story in mind by rhizome · · Score: 0

      Or they could just be an innocent citizen arrested by the secret police of a totalitarian state that denies freedom to its own people?

      I love it when ideologues generalize on "freedom," especially in the morning. It smells like bloggery.

      Take it from me, kid: you remember all those stories about how bad the Soviet Union was, like in the 70s? They were exaggerated.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    3. Re:Keep this story in mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paraphrasing memories of the best way I've heard it explained: different types of hacker do different things in different ways. The idle curiosity hacker, the corporate espionage hacker, the security consultant, the military, the malware-and-botnet master... not a whole lot of crossover in their choices of target and their activities once they get into a system. To hazard a guess here, an idle hacker is going to explore any interesting system he can, which will be a mix of military, corporate, and educational systems; and he's gonna do stuff like poke around and grab the occasional file. Whereas a military spy is going to be focusing on building in backdoors, evading detection, and getting as much data as possible - and will be trying to siphon off that data in as innocuous a way as possible, which will probably mean lots of accounts grabbing small pieces at a time during times that no one would notice, deleting or editing logs; possibly, after viewing some data, uploading and overwriting it with slightly altered stuff either as outright sabotage or to probe for how the digital and human elements detect and react to it (or how they fail to).

      And on the other hand, of course, China has kind of dug itself into a hole that is very hard to argue its way out of; there are too many levels of contradiction between all the things they've said. Authoritarian, with tight network control and high penalties for crime; a military clamoring for aggressive advances in tech and internet warfare; decades of anti-western PR; but we insist, these attacks coming from our military IP blocks to your military IP blocks aren't China! No, they're evil foreign hackers! Really!

  13. James Bond? More like Stefan Urquelle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Urkel

    1. Re:James Bond? More like Stefan Urquelle by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that Best Buy offers the genetic transmutation thingamajigger that turned Steve Urkel into Stephane Urquelle in their recommended purchases section. Either that, or surf eBay for the used original.

  14. The death of newspapers by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every time I hear about the death of newspapers, I wonder how the efforts of a small number of full time reporters would match up to the lackadaisical efforts of a million maternal basement dwellers with Internet connections.

    1. Re:The death of newspapers by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      I don't think there'd be that much difference, it might even be better. Reporters are after sensation, basement dwellers might actually be more realistic.

  15. A missed chance to effectively use the tubes ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    was probably operation TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System), which would have given each and every US-citizen the chance to effectively spy on his neighbours. But sadly, only a few are lucky now, quote (loc. cit.): "On June 30, 2008, the Denver Post reported that 181 individuals, including police officers, paramedics, firefighters, utility workers, and railroad employees had been trained as Terrorism Liaison Officers to report suspicious information which could be signs of terrorist activity. The article also stated that TLOs were already active in six other states and the District of Columbia". </sarcasm>

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  16. I'm not sure... by Nakoruru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure that I want the same pool of people that believe in faces on Mars, and other hoaxes, interpreting photos of North Korea.

  17. Re:North Korea by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 0, Troll

    I agree, how do we know pictures of "concentration camps" weren't planted there by the CIA? And I trust NK "defectors" as much as I trusted Iraqi defectors and their tales of Saddam's advanced WMD programs back in 2003.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  18. Wikileaks by HalAtWork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wikileaks has also played an important role in revealing secrets. In addition, Wikipedia also helps people disseminate information that is direct and to the point, in plain language, with references and with links to articles containing more specific information. It's an invaluable tool for knowledge. I hope it never disappears, and I am glad that they offer burnt-to-DVD versions of articles.

    Plus, every time I visit a web site for information, I save it, because I never know if that information will disappear or change. When I go back, I save another copy so I can compare, and also so I can retain information in previous copies should I need to reference it.

  19. Re:North Korea by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    every time the American news discusses North Korea, they show a North Korean military parade with pictures of tanks rolling by

    I get the point you're trying to make here and more or less agree with it. But I think the fact that news outlets in the west always show footage of military parades when discussing North Korea has less to do with conspiracy than it does with that country being so tightly controlled that there really isn't anything else for them to show.

    It's case of not attributing to malice that with can adequately explained by laziness (on the part of western TV networks).

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  20. Re:North Korea by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I suggest asking someone from the north of China (which is where the North Korean refugees run to) about this and you'll get a bit more understanding of the situation. North Korea is an incredibly nasty place to live unless you are one of the elite. While things in the south have not been ideal the north is an entirely different world of horror.

  21. Friend, you have no idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me tell you, totalitarian Soviet-like propaganda that North Koreans (and, formerly, Soviets) were experiencing has nothing to do with "reasons" or "reasoning".

    This is how it works: in school or at work, day after day, they make you repeat what the newspapers say. Originality is bad for you, thinking is bad for you, reasoning is bad for you. Parroting it back with every show of enthusiasm is good for you.

    Life in Korea and (in the Soviet Union) is very militarized, and the rolling tanks are a big deal. Parades are sacred (and you are made to show up to watch and cheer whether you want it or not).

    Life of an ordinary person in North Korea (and in USSR) is somewhere between slavery and serfdom, and is permeated with fear. Let me tell you, this kind of life sucks.

    The US troops in South Korea was the only thing that prevented the same regime from being established all over Korea. Now South Koreans can work on their computers, cars, etc., rather than dying of hunger by the millions (look up the recent hunger in NK). Alas, not every nation taken over by Communists was so lucky. Recall that in Cuba they only just allowed people to own computers and cell phones (if they can afford them). But try finding some Cubans online.

    That said, Western media is indeed quite stupid. It drools over tyrants and is easily impressed by staged performances, including parades. What they should have been showing is the abject poverty and fear in which ordinary people live. But you can't show that in 2 seconds, you have to live there to see it.

    1. Re:Friend, you have no idea by vandan · · Score: 1

      This is how it works: in school or at work, day after day, they make you repeat what the newspapers say. Originality is bad for you, thinking is bad for you, reasoning is bad for you. Parroting it back with every show of enthusiasm is good for you.

      I hate to break it to you, but this applies to us as much as it does them. The difference is that in the West, we've perfected it to such an extent that our population are almost completely unaware.

  22. Re:North Korea by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The worst case I saw of this was on 9/11 when a leading US News network (not sure which) showed file footage of celebrating Palestinian soccer fans and said they were celebrating the attack. There is often malice or an agenda in the choice of footage to show with an emotive story.
    However - it's true as said above there's not really much film of things happening in North Korea anyway. Not even the Chinese just over the border know much about what is going on apart from what they hear from refugees - and that even includes the Chinese with relatives in North Korea which they may not hear from in decades.

  23. FEMA Camps by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    Uh, ever tried searching google earth for FEMA Camps in the USA?

  24. Re:North Korea by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

    The worst case I saw of this was on 9/11 when a leading US News network (not sure which) showed file footage of celebrating Palestinian soccer fans and said they were celebrating the attack.

    I agree, that was a pretty egregious case of manipulation on the part of the network involved (Fox, probably, but I could be wrong). But I don't think the same situation exists with television news organizations re: the PRK. That's due more to a lack of creativity than bias.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  25. Roxana Saberi possessed secret military documents. by reporter · · Score: 1
    timeOday wrote, "And keep this story in mind the next time an "American" (they always turn out to be dual citizens) is arrested for spying in Iran or China".

    timeOday is referring to Roxana Saberi. The Iranian government rarely acts appropriately, but in her case, it was 100% in the right in sentencing her to imprisonment.

    The American media understandably presented her as an innocent victim. American journalists simply did not know that Roxana Saberi had taken -- without authorization -- top-secret military documents authored and owned by the Iranian government. Those documents assessed the Iraq War.

    If a dual national had done the same thing in the USA, then Washington would have sent her to prison.

    In the case of Roxana Saberi, Tehran was right to act. Washington was wrong to complain.

    The American people were wrong to support Saberi. She made no attempt to rescind her Iranian citizenship while simultaneously holding American citizenship. Indeed, she used her Iranian citizenship to her advantage to get a job with the Iranian government.

    Americans should not waste resources -- time, money, or lives -- in supporting a person who willfully exhibits divided loyalties.

  26. Re:North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That, and a series of other misfortunes for North Korea led things to what is admittedly a sad state."

    What in the !?$!$# are you talking about? North Korea is largely responsible for its own sad state. A large number of its citizens starving every few years is not because of outside influence, but largely because of many years of internal mismanagement. The mismanagement includes building lavish palace complexes like this, complete with an entire valley fenced off and a private railway station. Long and expensive railway lines have been built through the mountains not to deliver produce, but to get the elite to their mountain palaces. There are dozens of these things. It's pathetic.

    The simple reality is, the elite of North Korea live in splendor while the average person is little better than a serf, and the only reason is because the leaders there *like* it that way. That problem has nothing to do with foreigners.

    And that's what's really obvious if you pour over the Google Earth imagery. It's remote sensing, but you can see right away that the country has been built to screw over the common people while keeping the elite in luxury. It's not socialism. It's not communism. It's like some 20th or 21st-century version of Feudalism.

  27. When everyone is a suspected spy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You might as well be in Nazi Germany, or old school Russia.

    Time to put that tinfoil on the windows too.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  28. Citizen spying == Neighborhood Watch? by macraig · · Score: 1

    We had this before the Internet: it's called Neighborhood Watch programs. My extension of it, and a solution to the fears of emergence of Big Brother with the advent of cameras on every street corner, is to wire those cameras up to either the global 'Net or a local WAN and let anyone monitor those cameras and report suspicious activity. The police would merely act on reports from citizens; police would not monitor the cameras directly except perhaps with the express request and consent of a citizen. If the camera system is "open sourced" and available to anyone, then it's not Big Brother, it's democracy in action.

  29. yeahhh, how that'd go down for you... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Setting: front lawn. Neighbor is watering his lawn and CBS is coming home from work.

    Neighbor: Hello CBS, good evening!
    *cbs jumps over fence and grabs Neighbor, dragging him to the closed garage door, and and slams him against it
    cbs: Where are the weapons?! WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS?!
    Neighbor (flabbergasted): weapons? What are you talking about?
    *neighbor starts to fall down the garage door as Bauer^Wcbs pulls him back up and slams him against it, pulling a USP and pressing it into Neighbor's nose
    CBS: The weapons, god damn it, the WEAPONS! It's over, my partner found your collaborators. They were here twenty minutes ago!
    Neighbor: Twenty minutes? There were girl scouts here selling us some Ginger Snaps about 20 minutes ago.
    CBS: Yes, the cookies! Terrorists are using them to disperse dangerous nerve
    Neighbor: They're just cookies, you crazy fuck!
    * Neighbor kicks cbs in the nuts takes the gun off the ground, and uses his cell phone to call 911

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  30. 35,000 idiots, eh? by vandan · · Score: 1

    Got nothing better to do? Of all the threats to the world order, I think North Korea sits pretty close to the bottom. How about we uncover some of the hundreds of secret & illegal US & Israeli prisons, nuclear sites, etc? Sure, I know the answer already ... because these are 35,000 idiots we're talking about, and they all believe that North Korea is out to get them, and that the US and Israel are bastions of peace and democracy. Of course, in our secret prisons, no-one is tortured to death. And our secret nuclear bases would never actually launch an attack on another country ... in fact these are better thought of as peace bases, and are only secret because our enemies want to attack our peace!

    1. Re:35,000 idiots, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're secret, how do you know so much about them?

  31. In Singapore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been already happening and apparently our government has turn it to their flavour. We have a website STOMP which is setup by our only local newspapers publishing outlet, SPH (Singapore Press Holdings aka. Singapore Propaganda Holdings) which is directly in control by the PAP (People Action Party) government. The website encourages anybody to take pictures of anything from 'ungracious' behaviour to some Youtube-wanna stuff and post as articles to discriminate people. Some of them actually become our daily headline news (our daily news is filled with gossip and rubbish). A truly sad police/nanny state...

  32. RE: Pres. Obana -- Indefinite Detention -- Enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama's recent tussell with "Dick" Chaney give sivers up the spine.

    "Indefinite Detention" has not been defined by Pres. Barak Obama -- yet lends to many actions by the State, to render Citizens as Slaves of the State.

    Is "Indefinite Detention" imposed for:

    1. Thought Crimes

    2. Crimes of Conscientiousness

    3. Crimes of "Original Sin".

    Much is yet to be said from Barak Obama.

    In his defense, Prudence would argue to incarcirate all citizens of the United States of America, into a new Federal Prision System, one that begins and ends at the physical boarders -- a truly wounderfull Gulag, given by his presumptions that -- all are guilty -- and must a all costs be stopped, otherwise killed and renderd useless to the aims of the Holy Executive and Chief. A new Religion thus born, a Religion of Hate, upon the peoples of the United States of America, from their own President.

    If it is the wanting of this President to make all peoples of the United States of America, the Enemies of the State, then the President Barak Obama has made himself the Enemy of the World.

    So unfortunate.

    Sleep well Barak.

  33. Re:North Korea by DavidShor · · Score: 1

    Several thousand people a year have visited North Korea. It really is a terrible place, don't delusion yourself.

  34. Apologists by thedudethedude · · Score: 1

    I never thought a story like this would uncover so many N. Korea apologists. I love the busybody remark -- no bias there. "Nothing to see, move along."