I have to imagine there are a bunch of existing laws that make this a serious offense. Just find the people that do this and come down hard on them. Then you can leave everyone else alone.
Is it possible that those women who don't feel it necessary to point out their gender in situations where gender doesn't matter tend to also be those more likely to communicate well?
Is it possible that those women who make it a point to draw attention to their gender in situations where there is no reason to bring up gender at all, are also more likely to be less convincing regarding the usefulness of their work?
You didn't read it. GitHub wasn't the source of gender. The researchers linked out to the contributors outside social networking services to determine their gender by public listed settings, where available.
Are you asserting the denizens of slashdot are not an accurate reflection of society at large? Because I find that hard to believe.
Absolutely. If I want to know what technologies will and will not end up being meaningful, I look at what Slashdot predicts. Then I assume the opposite.
This methodology is significantly more accurate than chance.
In any case I found the 'botting puzzle' to be much deeper than the 'bilging puzzle'. It would still be fun if it was single-player.
That's funny. I wrote one of my earliest botting apps to handle the island resource mining in YPP at a very remote island. It had some features built in to avoid detection, but the ocean masters (right?) never did give me a hard time.
How about letting us destroy old accounts, so the inevitable future db exposure or ownership changes don't put our information in the wrong hands, years after we've stopped using them.
We are constantly evaluating our product portfolio in the context of our overall strategic goals. With that in mind, we have begun a process to focus our resources on our most strategic initiatives and to drive more innovation and faster growth within those products.
We're considering which products to axe and keeping the ones that are doing better.
So the new design isn't busy enough, it's too easy to read, shouldn't have pictures, and minimizing the trollish bits that keep people away annoys you. Thanks for the input!
The real joke of it all is that we have, or had, and few of the vehicles listed. They just didn't look exactly like the artists rendition on the cover of PopSci.
My dad was a plumber for 30 years. That just happened to be after getting his masters. Most of the programmers and tech drones I've known couldn't hold a candle to him.
Somewhere along the line we decided that any programmer, IT guy, etc. are somehow smarter than anyone else. We're generally not. Learning to Google a solution to a problem is no more brilliant than anyone else working out how to do their profession.
If only Obama were the actual socialist that a certain media company says he is, you might actually hate him less. But he's not: the bastard is corruptly selling his DoJ to the highest bidder in a way that would horrify Marx and Engels. If only GWB were the conservative he ran as, you would hate him less, but at least your cold uncaring government would be cheap. But he wasn't: somehow the dimwit managed to commit to more spending of public funds than LBJ and FDR combined, funnelling it into contractors' pockets at everyone's expense.
Shit man, I'm totally going to steal this paragraph from you, intact. That was a great way to illustrate what a lot of us have been saying for a long time... politics is bullshit.
However, the Pentagon and other federal agencies are already using those airwaves for everything from flying drones and surveillance to satellites and air combat training.
All the more reason to hand it over to civilian mobile phone use.
You think they'd just stop flying drones, call off air combat training, and neglect to send up replacement satellite hardware?
Say, can you write a proposal for how this will save oodles of money upgrading IE8 on 10000 machines to IE10, even tho it will brake the internal apps of about 15 different departments? Maybe you can also write 15 separate proposals for them to renew their contracts with the people who originally wrote the apps, and proposals for the cases where the original dev is long gone and we'll need to do a full replacement.
So the excuse is, "But maintaining an important app involves work."? What someone really ought to write is a termination notice.
Anyone that has a large businesses' critical applications tied to decade+ old technology has grossly underperformed in their position. And if they inherited that mess, it was their first priority to clean up after former, horribly inept individual, with the explicit goal of dealing with the elephant in the room. If they still don't have a plan to extricate the business from a miserable position, where it's their job to do so, they're simply not doing their job.
From a tech perspective, the idea of having anything tied to IE8 is a little ridiculous, as anything written at the time should've been spec'd for cross-browser support, or at worst, require minor rendering bugfixes. Everyone knew better by then.
Anyone still asleep at their desk while a company relies on IE6 should be terminated as soon as possible, no questions asked, and preferably never employed in tech again. That's an absurd situation, for which there's no imaginable excuse.
Yeah none of this really has anything to do with cloud services. It's just a shift to a subscription model.
The cloud part was obviously thrown in as a marketing thing to make it more palatable (which is sad), and aside from the throw-away storage, has nothing to do with any of this.
As is pointed out in the summary, this is not the first of these. And as far as I know none of the ones we've heard about have been shut down for stupid reasons.
Let's keep the doom and gloom under our hats for now, and just wish them luck.
I didn't know Lenovo owned them. This reminds me a bit of the Cisco+Linksys pairing. Putting a respectable name on a budget line of products doesn't seem to help, it just makes you less sure of anything with the respectable name.
Yeah, this seems like a simple enough problem to solve. Well, simple for new installations.
That video, which is the first I've ever seen on this, mentions that the location is about 1,000 ft (300m) away, but it looks like the distance needs to be greater than that.
I see, so that was a change in price for illicit goods, and the safer alternative in Afghanistan is a good replacement? I don't know much about farming, but it sounds like an "everyone wins" scenario, to me. Well... everyone but the bad guys.
That is like an official coming out and saying that some new Drone over in Iraq that can be taking control over by yelling your name and location into radio ch-4.
No. We have no reason to think it's anything like that.
The important takeaway is that the Navy is actually checking their shit. The deficiencies in network security were found by Navy pen testers, determined to be "not severe enough to prevent the deployment", the results are classified, and they're working on improving them.
That's how things get done. Test and improve, all the time, because no part of any complex system is, or ever will be, perfect.
Slashdot Mirror
At best, it's tacky as fuck. Just when you start to think MSFT is getting their shit together, they go and do something absolutely absurd like this.
I have to imagine there are a bunch of existing laws that make this a serious offense. Just find the people that do this and come down hard on them. Then you can leave everyone else alone.
Is it possible that those women who don't feel it necessary to point out their gender in situations where gender doesn't matter tend to also be those more likely to communicate well?
Is it possible that those women who make it a point to draw attention to their gender in situations where there is no reason to bring up gender at all, are also more likely to be less convincing regarding the usefulness of their work?
You didn't read it. GitHub wasn't the source of gender. The researchers linked out to the contributors outside social networking services to determine their gender by public listed settings, where available.
Are you asserting the denizens of slashdot are not an accurate reflection of society at large? Because I find that hard to believe.
Absolutely. If I want to know what technologies will and will not end up being meaningful, I look at what Slashdot predicts. Then I assume the opposite.
This methodology is significantly more accurate than chance.
In any case I found the 'botting puzzle' to be much deeper than the 'bilging puzzle'. It would still be fun if it was single-player.
That's funny. I wrote one of my earliest botting apps to handle the island resource mining in YPP at a very remote island. It had some features built in to avoid detection, but the ocean masters (right?) never did give me a hard time.
How about letting us destroy old accounts, so the inevitable future db exposure or ownership changes don't put our information in the wrong hands, years after we've stopped using them.
We are constantly evaluating our product portfolio in the context of our overall strategic goals. With that in mind, we have begun a process to focus our resources on our most strategic initiatives and to drive more innovation and faster growth within those products.
We're considering which products to axe and keeping the ones that are doing better.
Anonymous posting has become a haven of trolls, far from it's original goal of protecting people when discussing work conditions and the like.
They certainly should not get rid of Anon on a site where you can't delete a user account.
So the new design isn't busy enough, it's too easy to read, shouldn't have pictures, and minimizing the trollish bits that keep people away annoys you. Thanks for the input!
That doesn't shock anyone. They just don't want to hear it, because it makes it harder to dismiss everyone that disagrees with them.
The real joke of it all is that we have, or had, and few of the vehicles listed. They just didn't look exactly like the artists rendition on the cover of PopSci.
Amen.
My dad was a plumber for 30 years. That just happened to be after getting his masters. Most of the programmers and tech drones I've known couldn't hold a candle to him.
Somewhere along the line we decided that any programmer, IT guy, etc. are somehow smarter than anyone else. We're generally not. Learning to Google a solution to a problem is no more brilliant than anyone else working out how to do their profession.
If only Obama were the actual socialist that a certain media company says he is, you might actually hate him less. But he's not: the bastard is corruptly selling his DoJ to the highest bidder in a way that would horrify Marx and Engels. If only GWB were the conservative he ran as, you would hate him less, but at least your cold uncaring government would be cheap. But he wasn't: somehow the dimwit managed to commit to more spending of public funds than LBJ and FDR combined, funnelling it into contractors' pockets at everyone's expense.
Shit man, I'm totally going to steal this paragraph from you, intact. That was a great way to illustrate what a lot of us have been saying for a long time... politics is bullshit.
Nicely done. Really.
However, the Pentagon and other federal agencies are already using those airwaves for everything from flying drones and surveillance to satellites and air combat training.
All the more reason to hand it over to civilian mobile phone use.
You think they'd just stop flying drones, call off air combat training, and neglect to send up replacement satellite hardware?
Say, can you write a proposal for how this will save oodles of money upgrading IE8 on 10000 machines to IE10, even tho it will brake the internal apps of about 15 different departments? Maybe you can also write 15 separate proposals for them to renew their contracts with the people who originally wrote the apps, and proposals for the cases where the original dev is long gone and we'll need to do a full replacement.
So the excuse is, "But maintaining an important app involves work."? What someone really ought to write is a termination notice.
Anyone that has a large businesses' critical applications tied to decade+ old technology has grossly underperformed in their position. And if they inherited that mess, it was their first priority to clean up after former, horribly inept individual, with the explicit goal of dealing with the elephant in the room. If they still don't have a plan to extricate the business from a miserable position, where it's their job to do so, they're simply not doing their job.
From a tech perspective, the idea of having anything tied to IE8 is a little ridiculous, as anything written at the time should've been spec'd for cross-browser support, or at worst, require minor rendering bugfixes. Everyone knew better by then.
Anyone still asleep at their desk while a company relies on IE6 should be terminated as soon as possible, no questions asked, and preferably never employed in tech again. That's an absurd situation, for which there's no imaginable excuse.
Yeah none of this really has anything to do with cloud services. It's just a shift to a subscription model.
The cloud part was obviously thrown in as a marketing thing to make it more palatable (which is sad), and aside from the throw-away storage, has nothing to do with any of this.
As is pointed out in the summary, this is not the first of these. And as far as I know none of the ones we've heard about have been shut down for stupid reasons.
Let's keep the doom and gloom under our hats for now, and just wish them luck.
I didn't know Lenovo owned them. This reminds me a bit of the Cisco+Linksys pairing. Putting a respectable name on a budget line of products doesn't seem to help, it just makes you less sure of anything with the respectable name.
Yeah, this seems like a simple enough problem to solve. Well, simple for new installations.
That video, which is the first I've ever seen on this, mentions that the location is about 1,000 ft (300m) away, but it looks like the distance needs to be greater than that.
I see, so that was a change in price for illicit goods, and the safer alternative in Afghanistan is a good replacement? I don't know much about farming, but it sounds like an "everyone wins" scenario, to me. Well... everyone but the bad guys.
So, no, it's not just an industry report behind this. It might be *gasp* actual science.
Fracking is a bullshit political issue now, not a technology issue. Nobody is interested in real information anymore... only rhetoric.
Curious. Doesn't the price per bag for fertilizer going from $4 to $100 make it prohibitively expensive for it's normal use as fertilizer?
Was there a considerable reduction in the number of IED's since the price skyrocketed?
That is like an official coming out and saying that some new Drone over in Iraq that can be taking control over by yelling your name and location into radio ch-4.
No. We have no reason to think it's anything like that.
The important takeaway is that the Navy is actually checking their shit. The deficiencies in network security were found by Navy pen testers, determined to be "not severe enough to prevent the deployment", the results are classified, and they're working on improving them.
That's how things get done. Test and improve, all the time, because no part of any complex system is, or ever will be, perfect.
No DRM means no income for the artist.
We know this isn't true. Look at the music industry, now look at your post, now look back at the music industry.
Is it dead? No. It's still a multi-billion dollar industry. But I can legally buy any song I want without drm. Hasn't killed them.
Wow. That escala... climaxed quickly.