Wine Project Frustration and Forking
Elektroschock writes "Wine attempts to implement the Windows API layer on Linux. There are some limitations and an important one is the missing DIB engine, bug 421. Chris Howe comprehends the dissatisfaction of core developers with the arbitrary project governance: 'Sorry to sound like a stuck record but the Wine website still lists "write a DIB engine" as a requirement, and every time someone does, the patches disappear down a hole because they're "not right." Someone document what "would be right," or take "write a DIB engine" off the list. I'd love to have a go at documenting it myself, but I don't have the time to reverse engineer it from a few years' worth of rejected solutions.' The latest attempt of Massimo Del Fedel satisfied all requirements set previously for the long standing bug 421, and his optional engine seems to work fine by all Wine quality standards. He seems to be extraordinary stubborn and insusceptible to mobbing. Usually it is extremely frustrating for developers when the goalpost is constantly moved. When is the right time for project members to fork when their chief maintainer does not respond anymore or pursues an adverse commercial agenda?"
Would you like some Cheese with your Wine? ;)
Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
What's wrong with Merlot? I mean, I prefer Cab. Sav. personally but Merlot isn't bad once in a while...
Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
In response to your signature, I wish to inform you that the logical '&&' operator, when executed on two integral operands is defined to result in the Boolean evaluation of their equivalence. Please, allow me to demonstrate with some rudimentary code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout << (int)(-1 && -1) << endl;
return 0;
}
As we can plainly see that '-1' is in fact equal and equivalent to itself (without some peculiar paradox of identity), and thusly '-1 && -1 == 1'; I am somewhat perplexed by your need to assert that '-1 && -1 != -1', and by reduction; '1 != -1'.
My question to you is this; who is it that you wish to correct on this matter, and how do they continue to exist in the scope of whatever singularity or particle experiment which so separates them from our laws of mathematics and logic?
Lastly, while they are there, can they pick me up a new flux capacitor?
Why would a drunk man try to eat wine with a fork?
Maybe it's frozen
Shouldn't he be fairly good at drinking wine correctly?
Perhaps he's attached to an IV alcohol drip ;-)
These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer