Slashdot Mirror


Green GT's All-Electric Supercar Unveiled

Mike writes "Swiss auto company Green GT recently released the first details on a svelte all-electric supercar that is being heralded as the most powerful electric race car ever built. Designed with the 2011 Le Mans race in mind, the Twenty-4 will boast a sleek carbon fiber chassis and twin 100-kw electric motors totaling 400 hp — enough to push the vehicle from 0-60 mph in 4 seconds flat, and to a top speed of 171 mph. GreenGT's head engineer Christophe Schwartz has stated that 'The GreenGT Twenty-4 design study could become our 2011 Le Mans Prototype electric racer, or it could even become an electric road-going supercar. There is a possibility to do both!'"

17 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. 24 hour charge?? by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What interests me is how they'll power the car in a 24-hour race. There don't seem to be details on that.

    According to their site, there's a large solar-powered charging station (100 square meters of photovoltaic surface) which can be used to charge the car between races, but unless they're seriously loading the thing with batteries, they're either going to need long pit stops for charging or the ability to swap out battery packs as fast as other cars can pit for fuel.

    On the other hand, with their target date two years out and the rapidly evolving electric car scene, I wouldn't be surprised if there was some hot new prototype hitting the car show circuit around then that blew their doors off.

    1. Re:24 hour charge?? by alta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Done right, I can see a mechanical battery change process... Much faster than gasoline fuel.

      1. Pull up to red line.
      2. 4 clamps grab wheels
      3. car is left up in the air 2 ft, while spent batteries fall out, exit passenger side on conveyor belt.
      4. new batteries come in at same time, put in proper position.
      5. Car drops, latching in new batteries
      6. clamps release wheels.
      7. 0-60 in 4 seconds.

      I could see a see a 4 second pit stop here.

      Skip the 'lifting' process, and have them drop into a recess and you get rid of the GForce limitations on the driver. But you also make it so the system is embedded in the ground or the driver goes up/down a ramp.

      Then again, remember how they want to shoot microwave power from space? Imagine if your power is beamed to you from the center of the track. (sounds dangerous)
      And then instead of restrictor plates, you get resistor plates.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    2. Re:24 hour charge?? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about Supercapacitors?

    3. Re:24 hour charge?? by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much is "a bit longer"? Several pre-production cars have already demonstrated 10 minute charging, while BYD claims it on the production F3DM. If you have a really crazy cooling system and, say, a 250kW Aerovironment PosiCharge charger or 300kW Norvik MinitCharge charger, you should be able to do ~5 minutes per ~120 miles.

      --
      Give a boy a gun and you arm him for a day. Teach him how to make a gun, and the whole metaphor breaks down.
    4. Re:24 hour charge?? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much is "a bit longer"? Several pre-production cars have already demonstrated 10 minute charging, while BYD claims it on the production F3DM. If you have a really crazy cooling system and, say, a 250kW Aerovironment PosiCharge charger or 300kW Norvik MinitCharge charger, you should be able to do ~5 minutes per ~120 miles.

      This car has two hundred-kilowatt motors in it. If you use a 250 kW charger to charge batteries that you're then discharging at 200 kW, you need to spend 45% of the time charging.

      Take a look at the air intakes on that car. It doesn't need air to burn, so those intakes have to be entirely for cooling airflow. Yow.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    5. Re:24 hour charge?? by billybob_jcv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree on the air intakes - generating downforce and brake cooling are also the reasons the air intakes are there. I'm sure those motors do produce heat - but I will bet it's still much less than an equivalent combustion engine.

    6. Re:24 hour charge?? by billybob_jcv · · Score: 2, Interesting
    7. Re:24 hour charge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even if the quick battery swap is doable, and it certainly sounds reasonable, more importantly can the current batteries last as long as a tank of gas so it doesn't have to pit stop more often than the rest of the racers?

    8. Re:24 hour charge?? by k-vuohi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saying "We'll do an all-electric race because, let's face it, they're not that good against the fossile fuel powered ones" may raise public consciousness, but not a desire buy one. Still, 400hp from an electric car is getting there.

    9. Re:24 hour charge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Holy crap. That is waaaay too complicated.

      1. Pull up to red line.
      2. Pit crew opens quick - release hatch.
      3. Press release lever.
      4. Slide out battery pack, possibly onto a small wheeled cart.
      5. Slide in new battery pack, possibly using a small wheeled cart.
      6. Close hatch.

      No need for elaborate lifting mechanisms. No reason to rebuild the pit, install ramps, or do other acrobatics. And while one or two people change the battery, the rest of the crew is doing the usual stuff like changing the tires which is going to be the longest part of the procedure in any event. And if you just need some more fuel, this could still be performed in a matter of 4 to 6 seconds.

      Notice that I use the term "Battery" in the singular while you use the plural form. There is no reason to assume that you would need to use more than one battery.

    10. Re:24 hour charge?? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Electrics can and do kick serious but in drag racing, barely streetable Corvettes and Vipers getting hole-shotted of the line and their doors blown off in the traps by something that looks like what your Grandmother might drive to the grocery store make an impression too! Check out White Zombie or 0 to 60 in under a second

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  2. Old tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has been done among Universities for several years. If I remember Ohio State and Oklahoma won a lot of the races with these cars.

    http://evri.ou.edu/lightning/specs.php

    The races were short, it could only run for 8-10 minutes depending on the load without changing battery packs. A quick release mechanism was designed where all 32 batteries could be changed in 10-13 seconds.

  3. Heat Problems? by icebike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why the big air scoops on this car? Do they have a heat problem? They almost look like they are placed for tire cooling more than anything else.

    You would think that they would try to make this the sleekest wind-cheatingest car they could instead of grabbing huge chunks of air.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  4. Re:Racecars? by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not develop a car normal people will actually buy and use? This is interesting but I don't think we have the luxury of trickle-down innovation at this point

    I disagree. We don't have the luxury of dumping millions of ill-thought out poorly designed cars on the market without adequate testing to ensure they won't all be clogging out junk yards with huge disposal problems of toxic battery components due to premature failure.

    We do NOT have an electrical grid that can support all the new electric cars you would love to see. Sorry, its just not there, and not likely to be there for several decades.

    We must go slowly on grid-charged cars until we can double our electrical generation capacity, and beef up the distribrution system.

    Race technology has always lead the way in the automotive industry. How else can you get worst case scenario testing in the real world.

    We DO NOT have to rush into deployment of half baked technology on a mass scale. We DO have the time to do this right. The end of the earth is NOT upon us.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  5. Re:Who cares abou archaic measurements like hp any by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can apply hundreds or thousands of foot pounds of torque by standing on a long lever. However, I cannot produce more than about .09 horsepower for any length of time. Uniform torque through the power band is important for good acceleration unless you have a continuously variable transmission, but other than that the maximum power and efficiency is what matters (and motors are far better at providing constant torque than internal combustion engines). 0-60 in 4s is rather slow for a supercar, but if it can maintain a higher efficiency by regenerative braking it may have a chance. Electric motors can usually handle 150-200% of their rated power for short bursts, like accelerating out of a turn using the energy regenerated from breaking coming into it.

  6. Re:Racecars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I couldn't agree more. The push for green car technology will only serve to hasten the demise of the U.S. auto industry, while doing little eliminate toxic waste. Ignore those who claim to be able to predict the future. Last time I checked, no one had a crystal ball.

  7. Re:Who cares abou archaic measurements like hp any by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't mean to nitpick, but it's possible for a human to produce a *lot* more than 0.09hp for quite a while. In the 1989 Tour de France final time trial Greg LeMond produced roughly 2/3 horsepower continuously for just under an hour. I'm not of that caliber but I can crank out just under a third of a horsepower for over two hours if I'm feeling really motivated, according to an on-bike dynamometer.

    While I'm on the subject, humans have pretty good torque characteristics, similar in shape to a steam engine's: flat up to about 90-120 rpm (depending on training) and then dropping off towards zero fairly quickly.

    Some electric motors have their max torque at 0 rpm, dropping linearly to zero torque at their max rpm, but others have sigmoidal or other odd torque/rpm curves; compound-wound and series-wound motors diverge (in opposite directions) from standard dc motors (if I remember correctly.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.