Slashdot Mirror


Data Breach Exposes RAF Staff To Blackmail

Yehuda writes "Wired reports, 'Yet another breach of sensitive, unencrypted data is making news in the United Kingdom. This time the breach puts Royal Air Force staff at serious risk of being targeted for blackmail by foreign intelligence services or others. The breach involves audio recordings with high-ranking air force officers who were being interviewed in-depth for a security clearance. In the interviews, the officers disclosed information about extra-marital affairs, drug abuse, visits to prostitutes, medical conditions, criminal convictions and debt histories — information the military needed to determine their security risk. The recordings were stored on three unencrypted hard drives that disappeared last year.'"

10 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Tell me... by orngjce223 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why didn't they just encrypt the disks? If it's supposed to be sensitive information, store it securely!

    --
    Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    1. Re:Tell me... by canipeal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why didn't they just encrypt the disks? If it's supposed to be sensitive information, store it securely!

      Because that would require common sense and competence.

    2. Re:Tell me... by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Requires competence. Most non-techies aren't aware that you can encrypt disk drives. They're also not aware that the Windows Password does nothing to protect the data if the device is physically stolen. Lack of common sense isn't really a fair criticism. Lack of competence certainly is.

  2. I feel MUCH safer now! by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are the same idiots who are putting surveillance cameras everywhere, fingerprinting and taking DNA samples from musicians who are simply visiting the UK to play in a few clubs (then denying them entrance because the clubs hadn't paid a fee and agreed to report on them), and generally acting like fascists.

    They're great at grabbing reams of private information they would have no right to if Britain were still a free society. Protecting it from unauthorized access? Not so much.

    Goddamn wankers!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:I feel MUCH safer now! by BlackSabbath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. I find it ironic that a nation that increasingly acts as if every citizen were a potential enemy of the state, is so free with information that could aid real enemies of the state.

      I do so wish George Orwell were alive to see the UK now.

  3. Re:Damned if you do... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How sick would a person have to be to be incapable of disloyalty?

  4. please explain by Swampash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone wanna explain to me how drug-using hooker-banging ex-cons are OFFICERS IN THE ROYAL AIR FORCE?

    1. Re:please explain by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're humans just like the rest of us?

      The list mentioned in the summary is probably from the topics/questions asked about. That doesn't mean that everyone of the subjects - or even just one of them - has an affirmative answer in all of them. I suspect the truth is rather boring, with one officer having done some drugs in his youth, a different one having an affair, a third one preferring professionals, several with completely clean sheets, someone with a conviction for some minor (but criminal) stuff done before he joined the force, etc.

      If you have to lay open your entire history - and background checks work like that - then it's very unlikely that you would find enough people with perfectly white shirts in the entire commonwealth to staff even one airforce base.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  5. Re:Damned if you do... by LaskoVortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If yes to any of the above do you want these as officers?

    If you threw out everyone who has ever done that one "immoral" thing, you'd have no one left. Everyone makes mistakes. Its even in the bible somewhere--a story about throwing stones (disclaimer: never read the bible). These are officers of a military. They are trained to kill people. Measure the morality of their actions against that fact and you'll find that indulging in something like and extramarital affair is minor by comparison. My only surprise is here is the lack of encryption.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  6. Re:When were we a free society? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We gained more and more freedoms over time. Looking back, we certainly enjoy more freedoms today than we did a hundred years ago, at least in Europe. Most of mainland Europe was ruled by autocratic kings and emperors who restricted the exchange of ideas and discussions, criticising the government was often close to high treason. We sure came a long road from this.

    When you look at it with a finer grained system, you'll notice, though, that liberties are in decline, though, and have been since the 1960s, at least in my perspective. It's been especially rough in the last ten or so years, when people all over the world could easily communicate with each other and exchange ideas much more easily and rapidly than ever before. Such things frighten governments and other powerful people. Because it's also never been easier to "spill the beans" and whistleblow.

    Government and industry are quite close to each other these days, and neither wants some of their practices to be smeared all over the planet, for everyone to read. It's never been easier for people to get information into circulation, content is not just music and movies, it's also information and ideas, and they can be spread, multiplied and distributed just as quickly.

    And that's what scares not only the content industry, but everyone who could be threatened by the quick distribution of any kind of information.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.