Slashdot Mirror


Data Breach Exposes RAF Staff To Blackmail

Yehuda writes "Wired reports, 'Yet another breach of sensitive, unencrypted data is making news in the United Kingdom. This time the breach puts Royal Air Force staff at serious risk of being targeted for blackmail by foreign intelligence services or others. The breach involves audio recordings with high-ranking air force officers who were being interviewed in-depth for a security clearance. In the interviews, the officers disclosed information about extra-marital affairs, drug abuse, visits to prostitutes, medical conditions, criminal convictions and debt histories — information the military needed to determine their security risk. The recordings were stored on three unencrypted hard drives that disappeared last year.'"

4 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. I feel MUCH safer now! by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These are the same idiots who are putting surveillance cameras everywhere, fingerprinting and taking DNA samples from musicians who are simply visiting the UK to play in a few clubs (then denying them entrance because the clubs hadn't paid a fee and agreed to report on them), and generally acting like fascists.

    They're great at grabbing reams of private information they would have no right to if Britain were still a free society. Protecting it from unauthorized access? Not so much.

    Goddamn wankers!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  2. Re:Tell me... by canipeal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why didn't they just encrypt the disks? If it's supposed to be sensitive information, store it securely!

    Because that would require common sense and competence.

  3. Re:Damned if you do... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How sick would a person have to be to be incapable of disloyalty?

  4. Re:please explain by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're humans just like the rest of us?

    The list mentioned in the summary is probably from the topics/questions asked about. That doesn't mean that everyone of the subjects - or even just one of them - has an affirmative answer in all of them. I suspect the truth is rather boring, with one officer having done some drugs in his youth, a different one having an affair, a third one preferring professionals, several with completely clean sheets, someone with a conviction for some minor (but criminal) stuff done before he joined the force, etc.

    If you have to lay open your entire history - and background checks work like that - then it's very unlikely that you would find enough people with perfectly white shirts in the entire commonwealth to staff even one airforce base.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org