Slashdot Mirror


The Unexpected Patents of Steve Jobs

Harry writes "It's no surprise that Steve Jobs' name is among those credited in Apple's patents for MacBooks, iPods, and other iconic gadgets galore. But the man holds patents for packaging, a staircase, iPod cases, and several intriguing products that Apple hasn't built to date. They all add up to an interesting portrait of the world's most famous tech CEO."

10 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Don't Forget the Lanyard by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    His name is also on a patent for the earphones/iPod lanyard and that patent references 47 other patents.

    You can find a complete list of Steve's patents here. For what it's worth, I find Jobs listed on 100 patents or patent applications and Bill Gates listed on two as the inventor.

    Probably a fair indication of what kind of leader you have on your hands ... definitely marketing/business for Gates.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Don't Forget the Lanyard by LKM · · Score: 3, Informative

      You think Jobs contributed in any technical way to any Apple product?

      He probably did. He did work as a technician at Atari before starting Apple. Clearly, Woz did most of the work, but Jobs has at least some basic knowledge of these things and probably has contributed something. The bigger picture is that he's very much involved in product development at Apple. The patents in question aren't very technical, they're more along the lines of user interaction design.

    2. Re:Don't Forget the Lanyard by Sandbags · · Score: 5, Informative

      He is that good. Every design, even in it;s most basic form, comes before him (or starts with him). He has very critical input, changes the direction of the deisgn, adds aesthetic charm to it, and has it redesigned at his orders to meet those specifications.

      One of his programmers wrote a personal application for streamlining video editing. After seeing it, jobs gave him dozens of ideas how to make the app flow better, designed a more aesthetic interface, and commissioned a team to further the application based on his specs and ideas using the programmers initial work as a starting point. Although the idea was not his, the final product was very much shaped by him, and he was credited in the design of the current iMovie app.

      jobs is not a coder, he's not a system engineer, but he's a design genious, and one of the singular most powerful infuencers of overall system design at Apple. Ideas like the lamp iMac, the apple remote design, how the apple store is staffed, software interface look and feel, and more all come from his mind.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    3. Re:Don't Forget the Lanyard by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      As to balmer I present the following evidence towards open mockery:
      Monkey Dance:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc4MzqBFxZE
      Windows 1.0 sales pitch:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
      Developers:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_AP3SGMxxM
      on google:

      "At some point in the conversation, Mr. Ballmer said: 'Just tell me it's not Google,'' Lucovosky said in his statement. Lucovosky replied that he was joining Google. 'At that point, Mr. Ballmer picked up a chair and threw it across the room hitting a table in his office,' Lucovosky recounted, adding that Ballmer then launched into a tirade about Google CEO Eric Schmidt. 'I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google.' Schmidt previously worked for Sun Microsystems and was the CEO of Novell."

      I rest my case...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Don't Forget the Lanyard by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know a lot about Gates' role, but Jobs had absolutely nothing to do with almost all of those patents other than being CEO at the time they were submitted, and in most cases having the opportunity to torpedo the invention but choosing not to do so.

      You are almost certainly wrong, as the patent attorneys who drew up the patents would not have put Jobs on them unless he in fact made a significant inventive contribution. Patent law requires that a patent list all of the actual inventors, and only the actual inventors. List someone who wasn't a real inventor, or leave a real inventor out, and your patent is invalid.

      If Apple ever has to sue someone over one of those patents, the defendant will get to depose Jobs, and will ask him under oath exactly what his contribution was, and if all he can say was "I was CEO", that suit will go nowhere.

      He may not be the main inventory, or contributed to all the things claimed on the patents, but you can be sure there will be something in that patent that really was contributed by him.

    5. Re:Don't Forget the Lanyard by Satanboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you read the article, you would know that the answer is yes, he does hold the patent on the hockeypuck mouse

  2. Re:*cough* by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm pretty sure they were referring to only those people who are currently CEOs. Not people who haven't held the position of CEO of a company for 9 years.

  3. Re:Apple Staircase by gubers33 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That would be the iStaircase, not the Apple Staircase.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  4. That made no sense by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, if im entitled to my own computer, why can't I edit my iTunes source code? I chose Linux.

    Neverwinter Nights runs on Linux and I can't edit that source either... you probably should not have chosen an application for your example.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. Re:Absolute Bullshit by tkohler · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's called a design patent and they are almost worthless except for stopping exact knock-offs. Design claims have no bearing on function so he didn't "patent a staircase", he patented "that particular look of a staircase".