Slashdot Mirror


Why Our "Amazing" Science Fiction Future Fizzled

An anonymous reader sends in a story at CNN about how our predictions for the future tend to be somewhat accurate (whether or not we can do a thing) yet often too optimistic (whether or not it's practical). Obvious example: jetpacks. Quoting: "Joseph Corn, co-author of 'Yesterday's Tomorrows: Past Visions of the American Future,' found an inflated optimism about technology's impact on the future as far back as the 19th century, when writers like Jules Verne were creating wondrous versions of the future. Even then, people had a misplaced faith in the power of inventions to make life easier, Corn says. For example, the typical 19th-century American city was crowded and smelly. The problem was horses. They created traffic jams, filled the streets with their droppings and, when they died, their carcasses. But around the turn of the 20th century, Americans were predicting that another miraculous invention would deliver them from the burden of the horse and hurried urban life — the automobile, Corn says. 'There were a lot of predictions associated with early automobiles,' Corn says. 'They would help eliminate congestion in the city and the messy, unsanitary streets of the city.' Corn says Americans' faith in the power of technology to reshape the future is due in part to their history. Americans have never accepted a radical political transformation that would change their future. They prefer technology, not radical politics, to propel social change."

11 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. have faith by psyklopz · · Score: 4, Funny

    We still have about 5 and a half years to fully set up the back to the future 2 future.

    i know i'm saving up for my hoverboard right now.

  2. DNF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My belief in a bright future was destroyed with Duke Nukem Forever.

  3. Re:I *am* living in the furture.... by Gorkamecha · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sadly, I still can't spell.

  4. Re:Flyin Cars by wisty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Better still, they could put autopilots on normal cars, and eliminate the shitty drivers. Of course, Fisher would object, as it would make it easier for unfit people to reproduce, but I think that natural selection in the human race is a lost cause anyway.

  5. Re:Does that mean...? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, you know what... forget the cars and ships.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  6. Re:I still prefer technology by sidyan · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean, placing politics in faith?

  7. Re:Flyin Cars by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least no one told me I'd be getting all my meals in pill form

    I remember being told that our lunches could eventually come in pill/wafer form in health class when I was in high school. We had an exchange student from Hong Kong who misunderstood this and thought it was going to happen in the next couple of weeks. He was almost in a panic about whether or not the price for lunch was going to go up.

  8. Re:I still prefer technology by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone tell the politicians that George Orwell's 1984 was NOT meant as a guidebook.

  9. Re:The real reason. by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

    the wars between the Cybernetics and the Bio-Engineered would be fierce.

    And highly entertaining to the spectators!

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  10. Re:easy solution by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why Google needs to recalibrate the differential equation of the search formula. See, if they'd set the limit variable to compensate for misinformation, which can easily be revealed mathematically if you use a derivative variation of the linguistic quantification operator, you can reverse the polarity of your crappy searches and essentially find what you're locking for in reduced time exponential to the search hits of the internet's tangent.
    Sheesh, its that easy people.

  11. Re:Greed by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget the rocket-propelled cellphones! Your call gets through, even if you don't have a signal!