Looking at Intel's New-ish Desktop Socket, LGA 1366

Slatterz writes "LGA 1366 is Intel's first new desktop socket in four years. It uses the same ZIF design as the familiar LGA 775 architecture, but it incorporates many more contacts. These big architectural changes are backed up by some less visible advances. Until now, Intel's quad-core processors have been constructed from two dual-core dies, but now Core i7 brings together four cores on a single die. It's also Intel's first processor design to use an L3 cache, shared between all four cores."

Comments

Uh, what?

[pathological liar]

This might have been news 7 or 8 months ago when the chips were released.

What's next? ATX Power Supplies Explained? "Plugs into any ordinary wall socket! Flick the switch and it turns on! Use it to power your computer! You'll see them turning up in shops any day now!"

Metaphor

[goldaryn]

"LGA 1366 is Intel's first new desktop socket in four years. It uses the same ZIF design as the familiar LGA 775 architecture, but it incorporates many more contacts

Bigger number! Woo-hoo! With the POWER of MATHS I can tell you ...1366 over 775 = 76% better!

Reminds me of when I upgraded my disposable razor from one with 3 blades to 4 FREAKING BLADES!!!11!1

I get 33% more hot babes now.. FUCK YEAH

(Yeah, yeah, 33% of 0....)

Not the new desktop socket

[nxtw]

LGA 1366 is intended for servers, workstations, and high-end gaming PCs. LGA 1156 will be the mainstream
  desktop socket.

What's the difference? IIRC, LGA 1366 has a tripe-channel memory controller and support for dual CPUs (via another QuickPath link). LGA 1156 has dual-channel memory support with support for only one CPU.

The desktop CPU for LGA 1156 will be called Core i5.

Re:Not the new desktop socket

[asliarun]

Please refer to the excellent Anandtech preview article on Lynnfield that will be the first family of CPUs to use LGA 1156. Lynnfield has uses a dual-channel DDR3 controller instead of using triple-channel integrated memory controller in its uncore like Nehalem does. However, the dual-channel controller should still provide enough bandwidth for most desktop apps (the Nehalem architecture is not bandwidth constrained at all, unlike all previous generation CPUs including Core2 that used massive L2 caches to offset the memory bandwidth bottleneck due to the FSB).

However, the main difference between Lynnfield/LGA 1156 and LGA 1366 used in servers is the fact that it doesn't use QuickPath at all. Instead, it uses a combination of integrated PCIe 2.0 x16 controller (to talk to the graphics subsystem) and a (much slower) DMI controller to talk to everything else. Its an interesting alternative to QuickPath which is frankly expensive overkill for desktops anyway. The key advantage of the new socket will be significantly lower prices of motherboards and CPUs, which will allow Intel to provide some credible alternatives to AMD's current offerings that may be slower than Nehalem but are also much cheaper.

Re:Not the new desktop socket

[asc99c]

The socket for Core i7 equivalent Xeons is the same LGA-1366, but the standard Core i7 only has one QPI link, so you can't use them in dual CPU configs.

I hadn't heard about LGA-1156, but I'm a bit suspicious whether it will really take off. I don't really understand now that Intel have launched LGA-1366 where is the room for a slightly lower spec socket. I wouldn't have thought a few extra pins in the socket is that expensive, and buying RAM in packs of 3 isn't that much of a problem - and it's optional anyway.

By Q3 when LGA-1156 is due, Core i7 will be already heading down into the mainstream.

2008's news again...

[ricky-road-flats]

And I thought Australia was 12 hours ahead of us!

Re:It *is* absurd

[drinkypoo]

You're an idiot. Please don't post here anymore.

Either you or your computer can set that power button to ACPI only, at which point holding it down for five seconds doesn't do anything except make the button temporarily shorter.

You are an asshole. Please log in so you can be modded down.