Slashdot Mirror


Twitter, Flickr, Hotmail, Others Blocked In China

An anonymous reader writes "Two days ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square 'incident,' several high profile Internet sites have been blocked in mainland China. These include Twitter.com, Flickr.com, Live.com, and Bing.com. While Internet blocks are common enough in mainland China, blocking such high-profile sites is unusual. In addition, blog reports suggest even state-owned television broadcasts are suffering multiple instances of muting lasting several seconds (again, not unusual for some foreign stations broadcast over cable, but unusual for local state-owned media) suggesting state security, online or through other technology, has tightened significantly, perhaps in anticipation or discovery of protest plans."

39 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds a lot like Facebook being blocked during the elections in Iran. I wonder if banning sites just long enough to restrict the flow of ideas for the season will become more popular/acceptable than perma-bans?

    "Oops, I can't access social sites today ... must be a "democratic" election coming up!"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yup. There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do? Not to mention every app just mentioned can easily be run on most china phones, so it's not like people have to be in net cafes in China to do said activities.

    2. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by rob1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do?

      Keep the mainstream folks who don't know what a proxy is (let alone how to use one) in check. For the rest, if they become an issue they'll just be labeled enemies of the state or whatever and dealt with accordingly.

    3. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The majority in China don't even have computers.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by koiransuklaa · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to reports young Chinese don't really care about Tiananmen, because they can buy stuff which makes them happy.

      Well, I've understood some young chinese don't even know that anything happened on June 4th and many others only know the cleaned up version: a small group of extremists tried to bring about civil unrest and the armed forces stopped these illegal activities with the least amount of violence possible. Why would anyone (consumer or not) object to that?

  2. Retaliation by siloko · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it, I'm going to block China

    1. Re:Retaliation by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's it, I'm going to block China

      I don't know if you're joking or not but if you're not here you go (and other formats)!

      Here's a brief explanation on how to do it in Apache with Russian and Nigerian IP ranges also. You may be tempted to do what many other people are already doing but remember that language barrier aside, you're blocking your website from 1/6th of the Earth's population.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Retaliation by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Makes sense - the amount of intrusion attempts and spam coming from Chinese servers may make it worth it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  3. and nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish the US would block Twitter too.

    1. Re:and nothing of value was lost by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about blocking Twitter, but my faith in humanity would take a big step up if it went under because everyone decided to ignore it.

      In fact, I'm so frustrated over the matter that I'm going to go blog about it on my MySpace and Facebook profiles!

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:and nothing of value was lost by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Twitter, like any communications medium, is what you make of it. You could start a blog and write about nothing other than the cute things your cat did today, you could write about topics of earth-shattering importance, or your blog could fall somewhere in the middle. You could Twitter about nothing other than the inane details of your life (cue link to the Penny Arcade strip) or you could use Twitter to connect to and keep in touch with a group of people online. E-mail, web pages, television, etc. They can all be used for the inane and valueless or for the interesting and full-of-meaning.

      In addition, what is value-less and what is full-of-meaning can vary from person to person. You might think that your post comparing the captaining styles of "Classic Kirk" vs Picard vs "New Movie Kirk" is great, but others might find it to be a fluff piece written by a fan with nothing better to do. Someone else might write a post detailing the pros and cons of a new fashion trend and, while they might think it is a valuable thing you share, you might find it meaningless. One person's trash is another person's treasure.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:and nothing of value was lost by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In case you haven't been following it, Brent Spiner is telling a short story through his Twitter account, one sentence at a time. (Or so says my wife; I don't use those newfangled interwebs 2.0 things.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  4. What are we doing? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships? Why do we continue to support reigimes of tyrrany?

    Oh yeah, because they make shit on the cheap and we're a nation of greedy slobs with a humane streak which lasts up until that $5 is taken from your pay cheque to buy your "morality token" for the month.

    Flamebait or not, if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:What are we doing? by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if no one buys Chinese products the people magically become not oppressed? Just look at the Cuban embargo, didn't do a stupid thing to strike down communism in fact by isolating themselves they haven't been exposed to non-communist ideas.

      All that would happen if we embargoed China is that the people who live in oppression now will live in oppression while starving.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:What are we doing? by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships? Why do we continue to support reigimes of tyrrany? Oh yeah, because they make shit on the cheap and we're a nation of greedy slobs with a humane streak which lasts up until that $5 is taken from your pay cheque to buy your "morality token" for the month. Flamebait or not, if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

      There's things which are "Flamebait" because they're blatantly false and often deliberate distortions of reality.

      Then there's things which are "Flamebait" because they're completely true and people can't accept that due to a number of character flaws and other shortcomings that render them unable to call things what they are or otherwise to deal with reality. The funny thing is, people get a lot more pissy and upset about this one, and try much harder to shut it down or to shout it down (like the pleasant individuals who can avoid inflicting their personal problems on others that they are) than the first category.

      Which one this is should be an exericise to the reader.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:What are we doing? by sesshomaru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently, after the bankruptcy, GM will be making cars in China...

      I'm not really looking forward to that, I'm not sure why the government decided to waste all our taxpayer money on GM if they knew they were just planning to send most of the jobs to China. But I guess some extremely rich people won't lose as much money as they were going to originally, which makes me feel just swell.

      I guess the people in charge of this, like our car czar, figured that that was what people were concerned about, that some well-heeled bondholders would have to take a haircut. Otherwise, it's kind of baffling from a political standpoint.

      Except in the "after we retire from politics we'll all be rich, rich, rich! And what are you going to do about it, vote Republican, mwahahahaha!"

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    4. Re:What are we doing? by gnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

      Yeah, but where do you think we get the $$ to buy that Chinese crap? Take a look at our national debt and the debt-holders. We're buying Chinese crap using $$ borrowed from the Chinese. It's a very dysfunctional, but symbiotic, relationship. Look up codependency. And our financial overlords (with whom I do not necessarily agree) seem to think that we need to keep buying this crap to sustain our culture.

      The only solution I see is a huge culture change (but that's terribly difficult to effect - If you can figure it out, please do.)

      Back on-topic, this sucks. I've got a lot of respect for the Chinese people, but their government is miserable. And they seem to be too big and disconnected to really shake things up. Events like Tiananmen Square make big news and show the world that they're trying, but don't really seems to affect the way things run day-to-day. I'd love to drop some pamphlets instructing citizens on methods for proxying out through the great Chinese firewall...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:What are we doing? by Weezul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nobody will starve. In fact, drastically slowing Chinas economic expansion will prevent them from causing starvation in other poorer countries like Bangladesh & India. Well, the U.S. doesn't have the moral standing for such action, but it'd definitely help poorer people if China slows down.

      Actually, slapping a 100% "trade rebalancing" tariff on Chinese products may be quite sound & legal; well there is a WTO framework for ensuring that your trade is balanced. But most countries first just want to stop China's currency manipulation. Of course, China can likely still fight these actions by tariffing U.S. goods, dumping dollars, etc. But I don't think those are such major problems really.

      I'd be more worried that such drastic action shows weakness, leading to long term loss of confidence in the dollar. To avoid that, you need some political cover like : a lunatic like Ron Paul gets elected, China invades Taiwan, etc.

      Oh, yeah, embargoes are alway bad, you want trade balance through tariffs, and natural currency revaluations.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    6. Re:What are we doing? by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SEP field, duh.

      Its somebody else's problem, not mine, makes it easy for my mind to just ignore or not care.

      On that note, you're free to go to China and fight for their rights rather than sitting in your nice comfy chair (which was probably made in China) using your nice computer (which certainly has parts made in China) and wearing cloths made in china.

      But you won't. You'll continue to sit in your chair and use your computer to trumpet how evil this is and how everyone is supporting those evil bastards and you'll continue to not actually do shit about it yourself other than doing anything.

      And thats good, cause your premise is flawed. Stop buying products from China and their lives won't get better, they'll get worse. Those Chinese workers are working because IT MAKES THEIR LIVES BETTER than the alternative. If they want change, they can bring it about. People did start revolutions before the Internet you know, even in China.

      Get off your political high horse and do something useful or stop your bitching. Yes you have the right to free speech, no that doesn't mean anything you say is actually useful or that anyone else wants to hear it or will act on it. Actions speak far louder than words, and your actions tell us you don't actually give a damn, you just want to pretend you do and make everything you're an activist. You aren't, you're just a loud mouth.

      The world will always have people with better lives than someone else. Thats the way the animal kingdom works. Always has, always will, its just life and nothing you can say or do will actually change it. Good luck finding support to help you out on it too.

      Why should I risk my neck for someone who doesn't want to risk their own to better their lives? Who are you to judge WHO has a better life or who would be happy if things changed. You have no idea what those individual people want in their lives, no clue what so ever. You just think yours is better and they should be like you. Maybe they don't want all the bullshit you have in your life. Maybe they really don't give a fuck about twitter? Stop thinking you know other peoples plights and what they want, you have no idea what those people want and there is nothing you can do that will make their lives better for sure. You think you should be able to go 'help' them with a 'better life' and let them suffer through a revolution while you sit in your Chinese made chair using your Chinese made PC to write smug dairy entries in your blog about how great you are to the rest of the worlds plight.

      You people always make me laugh, you always know how to make it better for someone else that you know nothing about. Do you have any idea how much your battle cry sounds like those used to describe the 'rightness' of the Crusades?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:What are we doing? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We aren't. We're buying products made by businesses in China, which are not the government of China.

      Except when the businesses are owned by the Chinese military or party apparatchiks. Then it gets blurry.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  5. Unintended consequences by harmonise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect that this will have unintended consequences like a Streisand effect. Some people who might not think about the Tiananmen Square incident might wonder why they can't get to certain sites. They'll ask a friend about it who will respond "Maybe because it's the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident." The listener's memory will be refreshed and the chance of people forgetting about Tiananmen Square and the date the incident occurred will be lessened.

    --
    Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    1. Re:Unintended consequences by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In 2006, the American PBS program "Frontline" broadcast a segment filmed at Peking University, many of whose students participated in the 1989 protests. Four students were shown a picture of the Tank Man, but none of them could identify what was happening in the photo. Some responded that it was a military parade, or an artwork.

      From Wikipedia, but still illustrates the point, young people in China don't know much about the Tienanmen Square incident unless they get it from hearsay or from people abroad. How often does the Kent State incident come up in day to day conversation for you? Would you even know about it if you weren't taught about it in a Modern US History class? How many Americans would look at you confused if you started talking about an incident where the US military shot and killed unarmed US civilians?

    2. Re:Unintended consequences by kohaku · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were 13 casualties in the Kent State shootings, 4 of which were fatal. The Tiananmen square numbers are (officially) 241 deaths, which is probably far smaller than the real number (There have been reports of up to 2400 deaths). I think it's disingenuous to compare Tiananmen and Kent State. Perhaps 9/11 would be a closer analogue? In any case, there was lots of media created about Kent State, and it _IS_ taught in schools.

  6. Re:People must notice the block. by SchizoStatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But alas remember this is the instant information age now. A few days after the anniversary no one will care about it and move onto the next funny video on youtube of cats stuck in a bag.

    --
    https://www.speakservers.com/
  7. Re:Psychics? by twidarkling · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, there are multiple editorial failures in this summary. And in honour of the story being about China, I vote that the punishment be summary excecution!

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  8. Editors, please! by curmudgeous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Two days ahead of the Tiananmen Square 'incident'...

    So, slashdot is predicting incidents now? Or should that read, "Two days ahead of the anniversary of..."?

    Yes, I'm picking nits, but the overall quality of journalism seems to be declining on a daily basis. Despite what some here may think, accuracy IS important.

  9. Re:Psychics? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was wondering how the Chinese had the foresight to block Twitter back in 1989.

  10. you're right and wrong by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships?

    Part of the answer to your first question is also availability. There are some markets where the Chinese goods have such a lock on production that it is nearly impossible to not buy something made in China.

    Sure, you can buy a Chinese made widget for less than an American made widget almost without exception. However, there are times when no amount of money will buy a non-Chinese widget because no such item exists.

    Furthermore, your statement

    products of these fascist dictatoriships

    Is itself an absurd over-simplification of the situation. Just because a product is made in China does not mean it inherently supports the Chinese government. Sure, taxes are (generally) paid but your $.99 widget almost certainly profits a greedy western capitalist much more than the Chinese government.

    if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression

    Not always true. As I said, there are times that you don't have a choice in the matter. Sometimes the only way to purchase the item you need for whatever task is at hand is to purchase a Chinese made version of it. If you don't believe me then take a look through the tool section of your favorite home improvement / hardware / discount / general merchandise store. There are some items that if you need them today, you have no choice but to buy Chinese - and if your choice is to buy Chinese or allow your basement to flood with water, I have a suspicion on which way you will likely choose.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  11. Re:People must notice the block. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

    They assume the government knows best and it's for their own good, for the most part.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  12. Not High Profile in China.... by vampire_baozi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, almost no Chinese use those sites. Twitter doesn't even have a Chinese language version, and has barely begun to grow in China (though it may, there are already several Chinese clonewares out). Nobody ANYWHERE in the world uses Bing, and the Chinese use QQ, Sohu, Xinlang, or other IM/Portal/Blogging services instead of Live/Blogspot. Flickr is the only one Chinese might even notice, and there are plenty of alternatives.

    The only Chinese that use these (now blocked) services are educated, and probably have decent English, and know how to get around these blocks. The vast majority of Chinese users use other websites, or have alternatives. The contrversial stuff has always been hosted on non-Chinese websites for obvious reasons, and people who want to see it are well aware of how to get around the blocks.

    Far more telling was the 7 hours of downtime Xiaonei went through yesterday for maintanence. They've already been shutting down certain Xiaonei groups and blocking users for doing political stuff, I wonder if the maintanence included any updates to help with censorship?

  13. Re:Is this done manually or automated? by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Configuration files? This is China, where labor is cheap. They have people manually inspect every request as it goes past the firewall.

  14. Re:People must notice the block. by rynthetyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Youtube is already blocked

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  15. Good thing the olympics made them promise! by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Probably "off topic," but it's interesting that they promised quite a bit in order to be allowed to have the Olympics. Makes me wonder about other promises. Makes me glad to live in the US. :)

  16. Re:More widespread? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just your government 1984'ing your ISP. Don't worry about it.

  17. Selective Memories by VShael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we all think it's terrible that the majority of the youth in China don't even know about the Tianamen Square "incident"

    But within America itself, how many of you know of, or recognise the following incidents?

    1) US Government (ATF/FBI) burns to death 76 people in their homes, and the FBI lies about it for six years, when it finally comes clean. No one is ever held accountable.

    2) 4 plain-clothed officers shoot an unarmed man standing in his doorway. They shoot a total of 41 times. He is hit 19 times. After the officers are convicted, the court orders them re-tried, and the second time around they are all acquitted.

    3) Unarmed students at an anti-war protest, are shot at by the National Guard. 4 die, 9 are injured. Again, no accountability. No convictions.

    1. Re:Selective Memories by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But within America itself, how many of you know of, or recognise the following incidents?

      1) US Government (ATF/FBI) burns to death 76 people in their homes, and the FBI lies about it for six years, when it finally comes clean. No one is ever held accountable.

      2) 4 plain-clothed officers shoot an unarmed man standing in his doorway. They shoot a total of 41 times. He is hit 19 times. After the officers are convicted, the court orders them re-tried, and the second time around they are all acquitted.

      3) Unarmed students at an anti-war protest, are shot at by the National Guard. 4 die, 9 are injured. Again, no accountability. No convictions.

      Um, all three incidents were front page stories on the news (i.e. not suppressed) and the last one has been covered in every American history class I've ever taken.

    2. Re:Selective Memories by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first one is about the Wako Siege, which even all the more informed people here in the Netherlands will remember. It was interesting reading up on it again. I can remember browsing the few US news channels for it when the news was fresh. IMHO, the only reason to leave this little piece of information out was to obscure the fact that people actually do know about this incident. Also, blandly claiming that the lives of these people were all taken by the FBI is taking it way too far.

      For me that's enough of a troll to not look at the others.

  18. Re:most college students dont care about Tiananmen by joggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, there are some significant differences between those two instances:

    1) I can google 'kent state' and quickly find the relevant wikipedia article from work without risk of reprisal (unless my boss sees me goofing off...) even though I'm using a public, static IP address that could easily be tracked to my computer (at least it could be easily tracked if I was going through the great firewall of China). I'd love to see someone in China be able to google 'Tianamen' and be able to click on the wikipedia article from their job with as much ease and lack of danger as I can here in the US.
    2) Just to get a taste of the difference between cultures, on the wikipedia article for the Kent State shootings the photographer received the biggest prize in journalism for the photo he took of the shooting (the same year the picture was taken, not years after the fact). It's impossible to imagine a Chinese photographer receiving a prestigious Chinese award back in 1989 for publishing a photo of Tianamen Square.
    3) The day after the Kent State shootings (were 4 died and 9 were injured) there was a nationwide protest by millions of students that effectively closed a number of universities. After the initial shooting no further deaths and certainly no executions occurred. After Tienamen Square, captured workers were quickly executed although students were not.
    4) The scale of the Kent State shootings is dwarfed by the Tienaman Square event. The official Chinese estimate of deaths in Tienamen Square was 241 dead with over 7000 injured (other estimates are in the thousands but because everything was handled very secretly by the Chinese government it is impossible for anyone to know for sure). As previously mentioned, Kent State was 4 dead with 9 injured. Also, nobody disappeared in Kent State. Whatever happened to that guy that stood in front of the tank? The last thing anyone ever saw was him being dragged away by the police. It is believed he was executed because the government was never able to produce him to quite the international criticism it was receiving.
    5) Tienamen Square involved the state's army. The Kent State incident involved Ohio's National Guard which is a rather different force. It would be unheard of to use the federal army to suppress a riot or for any civil purpose. The local national guard is a very different force, used to help with natural disasters and, in rare cases, to help with crowd control in riots. One big difference is the national guard doesn't have tanks...
    6) Coverage of Kent State was not suppressed in the American news at the time nor afterward. It still is unacceptable to talk about Tienamen Square on TV or newspapers in China except with great care and few words.

  19. Re:Bad Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are thousands and thousands of factories run by the PLA or by a direct proxy front man corporation.

    And you know that. Funny you don't mention that. Maybe yours isn't,(how about your official chinese partner, you need one to be in business there, something else you failed to mention) but you know it goes on and a lot of bribery and corruption exists.

    The same political gang that killed tens of millions of their own people is STILL IN CHARGE.

    It is NO DIFFERENT from if the nazis were still in charge in Germany. Totalitarian genocidal murderers. Now they are just richer than 20 years ago.Richer and mnore powerful. I guess anything goes as long as you profit, right?

    So yes, it is totally legitimate to paint with a broad brush once it comes to mainland China. We should have never normalized trade relations without an exact, carved in stone, due date by, quid pro quo and them loosening the reins and giving their people real freedom. There's still no freedom of speech, freedom of political expression outside of their one party rule, no real freedom of religion, nothing. Opening up trade to them hasn't resulted in one more iota of real freedom now than they had 20 years ago. And they seek to keep their people brainwashed forever, even to the point of censoring what is common knowledge in the rest of the world. So we made the planets largest military dictatorship richer, and near destroyed the US middle class by selling off our manufacturing infrastructure for pennies on the dollar.