Slashdot Mirror


KDevelop4 Beta 3 Released

mikesd81 writes "KDE announced on May 30th the third public beta of KDevelop4. Some new features include a new code-writing assistant, a new documentation plugin showing you the API docs for Qt and KDE APIs, a reworked Mercurial plugin, and a rewrite of the classbrowser plugin. Two plugins from the KDevelop source, QMake support and Qt Designer integration, were let go and moved to the KDE Playground area."

3 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Will we get another "don't use me yet" "release by ultrabot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, someone needs to find who wrote the fucking memo that says you can have all the regressions you want as long as your applications use Qt4.

    It's a new app, there is no such thing as a regression. Same applies to many other KDE4 progs.

    That being said, C++ intelligence for KDevelop4 rocks. Too bad it's not as stable as Qt Creator yet (so I already sort of jumped the ship).

    For kdevelop4, perhaps they could consider the approach taken by emacs for gdb integration as "competitive" measure- i.e. just act as all-singing, all dancing code showing frontend for gdb, with normal gdb console visible at all times. For many scenarios, dumbened frontends just can't hack it.

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  2. Re:Fantastic by HatofPig · · Score: 4, Informative

    Highly recommend that everyone scroll through tons of pretty screenshots and feature lists on this developers blog which will give you a way better idea of how awesome KDevelop is going to be than the summary links will.

    --
    Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
  3. Re:Watcom C++ by d43m0n13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, KDevelop (at least version 3) has a very nice Intel C++ support, and Sun's compiler (whatever it's called nowadays) support too, I think. Even if KDevelop didn't support a particular compiler, the only thing missing would be the jump-to-error functionality.

    And Watcom, is, well, irrelevant (ISO C++, anyone?).