Slashdot Mirror


Sorry For the Detainment, Here's a Laptop

A select group of 17 Uighur Muslims held in Guantánamo, and waiting for a nation to grant them asylum are getting laptops and web training from the US military. Their web training will take place in a virtual computer lab the military has set up. The lessons will be limited to DVD language training as well as a basic users skill — set to help in any future employment options. Nury Turkel, an Uighur rights activist, said the training would help the men "be reintroduced into a modern society," adding that it "also would give hope to the men that their freedom is nearing." This special group already gets to order fast food and use a phone booth for weekly calls. I think the government is on to something here. Nothing keeps a man pacified like an occasional phone call, a cheeseburger, and surfing for a little porn.

14 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Right. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Give a terrorist the tools and knowledge to conspire against us with people around the globe, instantly. What could possibly go wrong?

    These people are not considered terrorists. That's why they have to be released sooner rather than later.

    They are currently being held because they can't go back to China, and they haven't yet found a place that can give them asylum.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. Re:These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get by danking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a lot of people there are detained as POW. They are not terrorists, they simply lived in a country and were part of an army that the USA decided to invade.

  3. Computers?...put them to work! by DomNF15 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see - shelter, fast food, phone access, and now computers. Yep, I'd say that makes their living conditions better than just about every homeless person in America. This must make the millions of recently unemployed Americans feel ever so special. Sorry to be cynical, and I have virtually no idea if these guys actually pose a real threat or not, but am I the only one that thinks prisoners should be put to work to offset some of that tax money being wasted on keeping them alive?

    1. Re:Computers?...put them to work! by rev_sanchez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kidnapping people and putting them to work against their will is called slavery.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    2. Re:Computers?...put them to work! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Making prisoners work provides a strong economic incentive for the state to create more prisoners. This rarely ends well.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Re:Uighurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, there is only one thing to be done with these people: take them into the USA, compensate them for their wrongful imprisonment, and finally allow them the chance to live a life of freedom. In other words, ATONE for what you did to them.

    Any upstanding American should be ashamed of what his or her country has done and still is doing to these men. Let all the NIMBYs fuck off, too - if I lived in the USA, I'd gladly have these people in my neighbourhood, and I'd show them what America is REALLY like. I'd show them friendliness, hospitality, tolerance and helpfulness, and I'm sure that this would not only be the right thing to do but also the best way of making sure that these folks will come to regard America as their friend in the end.

  5. a political problem, not legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is not a real problem here. I'm a former refugee (along with my family), lived with tortured persons, and families of political prisoners and know there are international laws and conventions that define what to do when you have people not welcomed in their own country. This false problem is because the US don't have the political will to apply those conventions after the mess they have created.

  6. you mean, like you are? by speedtux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get?

    These people have not been convicted of anything; many of them were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Would you want them driving your taxi cab? Flipping your burgers? Digging up your main sewer line?

    Why wouldn't I?

    You fucking bleading heart liberal socialists need a quick lesson in The World in the 21st Century. It is US against them.

    "F*cking fascists" (to use your own words) like you need a quick lesson of The World in the 20th Century, because attitudes like yours brought us two world wars and genocide.

    On the other hand, Islamic terrorism is insignificant; for all its fireworks, 9/11 simply wasn't a significant contributor to mortality in the US even in 2001. People (like you) who try to create irrational fear because of 9/11 are helping the terrorists, both by destroying our liberties and by ascribing more power to terrorists than they actually have.

    The US will not win the war on terrorism by force or jailing people. The only way we can win is through justice and compassion.

    1. Re:you mean, like you are? by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US will not win the war on terrorism by force or jailing people. The only way we can win is through justice and compassion.

      and by rectifying or making amends for past injustices. like our overthrow of Iran's government in the 50s to help out our imperial buddies in the UK. or our current imbroglios. i think a strong dose of non-intervention is in order for the next 50 years. even in cases where the driving public sentiment is to help people, our hands are too dirty and our reputation too stained by our past to be effective at anything more than making things worse.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  7. The better-safe-than-sorry theory by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because the Military chose not to prosecute does not mean these were sweet villagers minding their shops and tending their gardens when "inaccurately" picked up.

    They were caught with weapons in hand in combat or with large weapon caches.

    Not really.

    In the wake of 9-11, the approach taken was that if it wasn't clear sure whether somebody was a terrorist or not, it was prudent to detain them and try to figure it out the details later.

    I can understand this attitude-- it's the "better safe than sorry" approach. It's not the way we do things in the US normally ("I'm not sure if this guy is a criminal or not, so let's arrest him until we can figure it out" wouldn't be allowed by any police force in America), but I can't say that I don't understand the reasoning.

    But the consequences of that way of operating is that many, or possibly most, of the people picked up actually aren't terrrorists.

    (and the downside of that is that, although they may not have been terrorists before they were detained, five years in Gitmo may very well have changed their attitudes... so "better safe than sorry" may actually make us unsafe, and definitely sorry.)

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  8. Re:These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pot, kettle.

    A lot of the people in gitmo are there because we paid some tribal lord a bunch of money for 'taliban soldiers' and they rounded up whomever they didn't like. So yes, Jamal the goatherder is not a terrorist.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  9. Re:Right. by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever hear of refugees? Is it strange that persecuted people from a brutal dictatorship would head to a country that practices their religion?

  10. Re:Terrorism; US responsibility for detainee actio by Omestes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In actuality, these men were found on the battlefield participating in attacks on the US,

    If someone invaded my country, I'd be on the battlefield participating in attacks against whoever it was. Its like saying the French Resistance in WWII was a terrorist organization, and was generally unlawful. The only time your allowed to fight an invading military force is if the invaders recognize your legitimacy.

    I'm not sure of the reason every singe detainee is there, but I have heard that there was some amount of them who were "enemy combatants", which is a different thing than a terrorist. An "enemy combatant" is a POW who is not subject to the Geneva Convention because they are called "enemy combatants".

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  11. Re:Uighurs by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Eight years of illegal imprisonment and, so far the get to use laptops but likely not to keep them and free access to junk food, damn those must be some pretty pricey computers and some really good junk food. Just give them free access to civil suit lawyers and a couple of years to make use of them. Once they are millionaires there will be plenty of countries who want to take them ;).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen