Slashdot Mirror


First Beta of Opera 10 Released

Miladinoski writes "Opera Software ASA today released the first beta of their tenth version of the Opera browser. In addition to the browser's known features, like mouse gestures, keyboard shortcuts, voice navigation, mail and RSS support, speed dial and so forth, it now includes a Turbo mode which unclogs your connection to get faster browsing, a new interface, a tabbed browsing update and customizable speed dial. Opera 10 continues to follow the web standards by getting 100/100 and pixel-perfect scores on the Acid3 test. The beta is currently available for every modern OS platform."

47 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Current Presto & Webkit Score 100/100 by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Opera 10 continues to follow the web standards by getting 100/100 and pixel-perfect scores on the Acid3 test.

    Yeah, I think anything running the latest versions of Presto (Opera) & Webkit (Safari, Chrome) are getting 100s. Two nights ago I put the latest and greatest Chrome in WinXP SP3 on my eeePC and got a 100/100 even though it said Linktest failed.

    Odd thing is that the more popular a browser or layout engine is, the worse it seems to do on the Acid tests!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Current Presto & Webkit Score 100/100 by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once again Opera pushes the misconception that Acid3 is the test of web standards compliance.

      I don't think they're doing that, and I think that if this was your Browser of Choice you would not be disparaging the fact that it passes ACID. Why the Opera hate? The ACID test is a good barometer of how "standardy" a browser is, that's all. No one is trying to claim that scoring 100 on ACID 3 means that the browser is 100% compliant with all web standards that anyone has ever made. Again, why the Opera hate? Should browser vendors not strive to reach 100 on ACID 3?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Current Presto & Webkit Score 100/100 by conspirator57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "it now includes a Turbo mode which unclogs your connection to get faster browsing"

      i miss the turbo button on my PC. reading this made me realize it. i blame you and the topic author and the Opera group for my unhappiness.

      [/joke]

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  2. Unclogs? by Fantom42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unclogs your connection?

    So the internet is... like a series of tubes?

    1. Re: Unclogs? by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unclogs your connection?

      If I understand correctly, Opera Turbo only works in conjunction with specialized servers.

      http://www.opera.com/business/solutions/turbo/

      You use a proxy server while you surf. The proxy compresses the pages (partly by reducing image quality and blocking plugin content until you click on it) and delivers the compressed version to your browser.

      I have lots of questions about this. Are there free servers available to the average consumer? Is this an open standard? Do the servers themselves represent a problematic bottleneck? Anyone understand this better?

      --
      /...
    2. Re: Unclogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, Operea isn't as fast as Opera. You should be cautious of cheap Chinese knock-offs.

    3. Re: Unclogs? by twidarkling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it's mostly meant for people on mobile devices, and people on dial-up could find it useful.

      It's free already for average consumers (since I played with it a bit this morning already). I doubt it's an "open" standard, since it's Opera's servers doing it, but I'm not 100% sure. No one's reported bottleneck issues, but that might change with more users on-board now.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    4. Re: Unclogs? by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Those are servers of Opera (the company). And they've been doing this for quite some time with their Opera Mini (for Java mobile phones).

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re: Unclogs? by BForrester · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now, bringing you your usual crap from the internets, but now in liquid form, it's Oparrhea!

  3. Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Opera follows standards, and Slashdot (even the homepage) looks like shit in Opera.

    Really, Slashdot looks like shit in most browsers with blatantly obvious bugs everywhere, like the infamous white on white comment titles.

    I guess that means that for all the talk and the bullshit, Slashdot totally hypocritical when it comes to standards.

    Fix your fucking code or get off your high horse.

    1. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by SirGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Really, Slashdot looks like shit in most browsers with blatantly obvious bugs everywhere, like the infamous white on white comment titles.

      Oh thank goodness. I just thought I was losing it...

    2. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by gazbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can confirm that with both Opera and Firefox on Linux (Fedora 10), Slashdot is completely fucked. And they are pretty damn Slashdot-friendly combos.

    3. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by billcopc · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe it is Karma-based. The lower your Karma, the more /. garbles your HTML :)

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I can corroborate that - subject headings still appear in black on dark green in Opera (which they don't in Firefox). Comment titles regularly go white on white, though that can be fixed by doing some random clicky jiggery-pokery.

      On the plus side, the actual speed of the site is far better in Opera.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    5. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by harryandthehenderson · · Score: 4, Informative

      You guys are either exaggerating or bending the truth.

      Or maybe, just maybe, just because you don't experience a bug that it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Secondly, you do realize there are more than just the singular versions of Chromium and Firefox that you use, and as such they may have differing behaviors, or that others may be using completely different browsers altogether, right? But no, it clearly must be people making stuff up.

      This reminds of back when the Linux kernel devs would claim their were no response issues desktop Linux because when run on servers with vastly more processors and power that there were no issues.

    6. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by iceperson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using 9.64 and can't see comment titles wihtout highlighting them.

      http://img141.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whitewhite.png

    7. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The moderation system works just fine in "classic" mode, but so does the "white on white" comment title thing.

      However, I learned from a post in another thread that clicking "change" in the bar at the top (without changing any thresholds) fixes the problem, and it works for me...

    8. Re:Slashdot Looks Like Shit in Opera by citizenr · · Score: 3, Informative

      how about you post a screenie how you think /. should look like? it looks like this :
      http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/9100/clipboard01sjl.jpg
      under Opera.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  4. Details on the Turbo mode are in the changelogs by NevarMore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/mac/1000b1/

    "This new Opera feature increases your internet bandwidth speed on slow connections using data and image compression technologies. Opera Turbo uses Opera proxy servers to compress the traffic before it reaches the Opera browser on the clientâ(TM)s computer; see this Opera reference. Opera Turbo can easily be configured to suit your browsing needs:"

    So it basically does what their mobile browser already does for your desktop. Cue tinfoil hatters in 3,2,1...

  5. Seems even faster than 9.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems quite fast, even compared to regular Opera. Entire pages just appear, rather than slowly loading/displaying...

    Kudos to the team!

  6. Turbo Mode Information by Fantom42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link to the "Turbo Mode" was kinda weak and just went to a Changelog, so I found this article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/03/opera_10_beta_debut/

    Dubbed Opera Turbo, the server-side technology reduces the amount of data that must be downloaded to render a given web page. It works by scaling back the size of some images and stripping out certain content types, said Opera spokesman Thomas Ford. Some content based on Adobe Flash, for example, isn't loaded unless a user clicks a button. In essence, Turbo works by establishing a proxy server through which compressed website content is funneled to the browser. It will not work with content that's encrypted using the Secure Sockets Layer protocol and delivers a benefit only when used on connections with limited bandwidth.

    A fairly interesting concept. I wonder if Firefox is working on something like this. Seems it would be a useful idea to explore at least for embedded devices or when you are tethered through a cell phone or whatnot.

  7. How do you define "modern"? by Zedrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The beta is currently available for every modern OS platform."

    Really? Says who? I can't find any such statement on Operas site, and if it's true - where's the build for AmigaOS 4.1?

    1. Re:How do you define "modern"? by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can download Opera for AmigaOS 4.1 from the Timex-Sinclair server.

    2. Re:How do you define "modern"? by jps25 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/unix/solaris/1000b1/en/

      God help us all if a post like yours is modded informative...

    3. Re:How do you define "modern"? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The beta is currently available for every modern OS platform."

      Really? Says who?

      The list of supported OSes (so sayth Opera):

      1. Windows
      2. Mac OS X
      3. Linux x86 64
      4. Linux PowerPC
      5. Linux i386
      6. FreeBSD i386
      7. FreeBSD AMD64
      8. Solaris Sparc
      9. Solaris Intel
      10. QNX
      11. OS/2

      Sorry, no AmigaOS

      BeOS

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  8. I really like Opera but by InlawBiker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I installed it and used it on my Windows & Ubuntu machines and really liked Opera. It's clean and fast, and I love the sync option. For some reason I have trouble committing to it. I also liked the speed of Chrome and, God help me, IE8. I know they're great browsers but I guess I'm just happy with Firefox.

    1. Re:I really like Opera but by at_slashdot · · Score: 3

      For me the choice is simple, neither Chrome or IE8 work on Linux, and Firefox is kind of piggish on Linux, on Windows is works pretty decently. I do find Firefox a bit more compatible with some sites but Opera feels more polished and I don't have to install any extension to get it work as I want, on a clean Firefox install I have to install at least 15 extensions to make it work like Opera.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  9. The beta is available for all modern OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just FYI: in addition to the beta being available for all modern OSes, I see there is also a version for Windows.

  10. Re:Turbo button...yes! by verbalcontract · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love Opera's speed. And I can live with the bloated features no one uses like Email and BitTorrent. But the sad fact is, a lot of sites don't work the same in Opera. I remember in particular that the uTorrent web GUI's Javascript didn't work at all.

    And it's a shame that Opera rocks the Acid3, but nobody really cares because most websites aren't coded to standard; they're coded to work in the 96% of people's machines, and 96% of browsers fail at Acid3. Opera's mostly been a victim of a million different cooks in a million different kitchens cooking for a million different people.

  11. Nice, but no x86_64 QT4 build... by qcubed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which makes me sad. I'm willing to be patient for a while, and this is a beta, but there's been almost no real discussion on the Opera Desktop Team blog about it. I may well eventually cave and reinstall the QT3 dependencies, but I do hope that I won't have to.

  12. Nope by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

    The internet is more like a plumbing trap.

    People pour masses of crap down it, but occasionally you need to reach in and search for a valuable item, and you come out covered in shit.
    What were we talking about again?

    1. Re:Nope by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 3, Funny

      And it's only by accident that the valuable item ever got there in the first place.

      And if you look at everything going through, you find a surprising number of body parts...

  13. Hmmm by C_Kode · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been a big fan of Opera for a long time, but I'm growing more and more disappointed in it. First off, I have 9.64 and I get an 85 on the ACID3 test, but that isn't my biggest issue. My biggest issues usually evolves CSS and JavaScript. AJAX sites not working or menuing on some of the Net's largest sites not working. (forget using MLB.com) Not to mention I've seen Opera's footprint being over 700M and still growing before. Granted I had more than a few tabs, but that is ridiculous! It's currently 215M while FF3 is 250M which I find acceptable, but that isn't always the case. (I use both browsers at the sametime)

  14. Re:Turbo button...yes! by SpeZek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And I can live with the bloated features no one uses like Email and BitTorrent.

    It ain't really bloat if it doesn't slow it down at all, in my books.

  15. passes an even tougher test than acid3 by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Opera passes an even tougher css test than acid3 -- unlike firefox and safari, it renders the titles of slashdot comments correctly.

    Yes, that's a joke. To see what I'm talking about, use firefox or safari to navigate to the slashdot homepage, and then click on the "Read More..." link for a story in the news, science, or technology sections. (This Opera article is in the tech section, but if you have your default threshold for comments set high, like I do, you won't get any titles of comments displayed right now, simply because there aren't any highly up-moderated comments yet, so you won't get any comments displayed.) What you'll see is that the titles of stories are displayed in white on a white background.

    This comment explains that it's due to a CSS bug in the stylesheets in certain sections. Here is a bug report that I did today in sourceforge. I couldn't find any earlier reports of this problem by searching on sourceforge's bug tracker, but they might exist -- this problem has been around for quite some time now. As a work-around, you can click on the story's title in the threshold form.

    It would be interested to hear whether this is universally reproducible with firefox and safari, but please be very careful to follow the exact instructions above. It depends on which section the article is in, and it depends on whether or not you're getting a cached version of the story.

    The fact that the slashdot crew hasn't noticed this bug on their own after such a long period of time makes me wonder how much attention they really pay to the site. (This is assuming that the bug really does occur for all firefox users.) We've had dupes and grammatical mistakes in summaries forever, but now that the firehose is handling submissions, it looks like the whole site is just on autopilot.

    1. Re:passes an even tougher test than acid3 by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, hi. Sorry I didn't recognize your screen name.

      I think I found the preference setting that screws everything up. Go to the top of this page (or any story thread page) and click the pen&paper icon in the top right corner. In the 'Viewing' tab there's a setting for 'Enable Dynamic Discussions'. If that's off, you get white on white. If it's on, things look fine. At least for me.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  16. OS X version by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A quick look shows the OS X version passes Acid3, is about 10% slower on javascript benchmarks compared to the last version, and still has no support for system services so it can't use the same spelling checker as all the other OS X programs or the grammar checker or other tools. Basically, I don't see anything that is here to motivate me to switch. Opera may be a really nice browser for Windows, but it is still subpar for OS X.

  17. Re:But there's no AdBlock Plus... by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd probably use it more frequenty if it had some Ad blocking capabilities.

    It does. Right-click on the page, "Block Content...".

    By the way... http://www.opera.com/docs/history/

    Integrated content blocking appeared in Opera 9.0, officially released on June 20th, 2006. Almost three years now.

    And a little bit of history: http://www.schrode.net/opera/url_filtering/

    Rudimentary ad blocking through urlfilter.ini appeared in Opera 6.02, released on May 15th, 2002. So, Opera has effectively had a form of ad-blocking capabilities for over seven years.

    It's not as flexible as what you get through specialized Firefox extensions, but it's there, there are pre-made filters available for download, and like I said, it's been a part of the browser for seven years.

  18. Re:Turbo button...yes! by kwandar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been a long time Firefox user, played with Chrome, but when I got my EEE 1000HE I decided to try Opera as I'd heard it was fairly fast and I didn't want to slow down that little processor.

    Opera is great! Not only did it not slow down, but I got voice command (which I had back with OS/2 Warp too:) which is great given the smaller keyboard. Its fast, works well, and I appreciate the built in bit torrent client (I don't need more software to clutter up a Windows box).

    Opera - I'm impressed!

  19. Re:But there's no AdBlock Plus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many ads depend on JavaScript and Flash to be served now. From my own experience, turning JavaScript and Flash off globally except for some domains (I'm using Opera 9.64 with sites preferences) will remove 99% of the annoying ads out there. That works across all browsers, that's why I don't need AdBlock Plus when I already have NoScript on Firefox.

  20. AdBlock Plus? NoScript? by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, does Opera have any functionality at least as good as AdBlockPlus and NoScript?

    They are the /only/ reason I use Firefox. Really, for webbrowsers, AdBlock Plus is the killer app - if Opera can block ads at least that well, I'll be done with Firefox for good. If not, I have no reason to use it.

    1. Re:AdBlock Plus? NoScript? by raynet · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is couple guys who publish a blocklist you can install to Opera that works by either blocking ads or hiding them in the page, unfortunately it does lack automagic updates or any GUI.

      I myself take their blocklist and couple others and combine them with Squid, that way I have identical adblocking for any browser I happen to use on any machine I have.

      Maybe someday Opera finally creates a powerful API to extend their browser so AdBlockPlus could be ported to it, or similar app be written. It seems that generally browser makers themselves don't want to include too powerful adblocks by default to their products and that is sad.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
  21. Re:Turbo button...yes! by nxtw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Right clicks shoudn't be used by a page usability-wise...

    Thanks for that, but this is how the uTorrent UI works. The WebUI mimics the Windows UI's functionality, so it's an interactive JavaScript application (using XMLHttpRequest) rather than a set of web pages.

  22. Opera and Adblock by yoshi_mon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It has already come up in this thread but I think it warrants another post on the subject. And just some quick background: I used Opera as my main browser since right around IE3. Looking it up now I see that IE3 came out in Aug 96' and Opera was released to the public in 96 as well. One of the main reasons I liked it was how they supported the nix platforms, albeit just with binaries, as well as Win32.

    Anyway suffice to say I used Opera for a long time, recommended it to friends who I thought were advanced enough to use it (Bit of a backhanded statement I know but oh well.), and even was sad when I moved away from it late last year. And the reason I finally did move away from it was that Firefox + Ablock + Noscript simply is a better overall experience.

    And yes I know Opera has/has had it's own content blocking for ages now, that is not the point. It is not nearly the same thing as plugging in Adblock, picking your list, and then you just go. I also say this having already used, and continue to use, my hosts file as a filter as well.

    As good as Opera is, and I still think it does a lot of things better/faster than anything else, the again overall experience with Firefox when you have it's addon support makes it better. And Firefox is also a much better replacement when moving an end user away from IE.

    Opera, unless they do some really bad things, will always have a home on my PCs but right now Firefox is better for day to day usage.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  23. Re:Turbo button...yes! by Vectronic · · Score: 3, Informative

    opera:config
    ->User Prefs
    -->Allow script to receive right clicks

  24. Re:But there's no AdBlock Plus... by lhoguin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use this: http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/opera/

    It took one minute to copy the file, and I didn't see any ad since then.

  25. Opera Easter Egg type /. for slashdot.org by locopuyo · · Score: 5, Informative

    just type /. in the address bar :)