Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Zotero Lawsuit Dismissed

Posted by kdawson on from the ending-of-note dept.

peretzpup writes "The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that Thomson Reuters's lawsuit against George Mason University has been dismissed. Last fall the news organization had sued GMU's Center for History and New Media over supposed violations of the EndNote licensing agreement by the Zotero project, hosted at the university. Zotero, a Firefox plug-in designed to help scholars store and organize their online research, has seen millions of downloads. Zotero project co-director Sean Takats's announcement is pretty heartwarming. No comment as yet from Thomson Reuters."

9 of 60 comments (clear)

  1. Hurrah! by Canazza · · Score: 4, Informative

    And rightly so. I doubt they actually made any money from the plug in, so $10m would have utterly crippled both the university and the students therein.

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    1. Re:Hurrah! by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is something ironic about citing Wikipedia in response to a [citation needed].

    2. Re:Hurrah! by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also the AC above was right:

      http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/items/3749

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Mason_University

      GMU's endowment is only $54,955,028. Wikipedia had an extra 1 on the front for some reason (I fixed it.)

      At the same time, I got the corrected figure from the reference cited on Wikipedia, so it doesn't really discredit wikipedia, so much as prove you need to follow your sources, whatever you're reading.

      http://eagle.gmu.edu/gazette/articles/9750
      This article also puts the endowment as just reaching 50 million a few years ago.

  2. TR shot themselfs in the foot with this lawsuit by pesho · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Taking page of RIAA playbook TR sued their own clients - academics using EndNote. The silly part is that many of the citation style files the lawsuit was about are actually created by Endnote users.

    To make their court case stronger they put legal language on their website that prohibited sharing of style files and reference libraries. This naturally raised questions from the endnote users, because sharing these files is essential part of using the product. The support staff on their user forums was put in an awkward position of explaining that that files can in fact be shared, while the language on their own web site was stating the opposite. Now it seems they have corrected the license statement to allow such sharing.

    Nice PR, TR;)

    1. Re:TR shot themselfs in the foot with this lawsuit by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Absolutely, and just like the RIAA, they are now out not only the lawyer costs and the goodwill of the public, but also a customer. From the Chronicle article:

      George Mason University said in November it had not renewed a site license for EndNote

      This is what happens when you fsck a client.

  3. Sharing ENS Styles by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now it seems they have corrected the license statement to allow such sharing.

    Kind of. Their terms of use state:

    EndNote includes customization options that licensed individual and institutional customers can use to create new and modify existing EndNote style (.ens), filter (.enf), and connection (.enz) files for their personal use and to share with other licensed EndNote users for use only in conjunction with EndNote.

    (emphasis mine). In other words, they claim that you can't use the files that you create using their software in third-party software, such as Zotero. This would be like saying you can't open an MS Word Document in OpenOffice.org Writer.

  4. Victory by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the sweet taste of victory for an excellent project. Thomson Education is notorious for charging exhorbitant amounts of money to students for textbooks. Their testing division is a borderline racket for the amount they charge for testing on testing software that still runs on Windows 2000 Professional and crashes mid way through the MC$E tests. I even was told that I couldn't get a refund or a makeup date because I was expected to be at a test center in the middle of snow storm in Pennsylvania. Never mind that two feet of snow fell. Any time Thomson Reuters gets its butt handed to it, I cheer.

  5. With or without prejudice? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was the suit dismissed with prejudice or without? The difference is important. "With prejudice" means that the issue is settled and they can never bring it before any US court again. "Without prejudice" means that they can try again.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  6. The ironic thing by femtoguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The really ironic thing is that if it hadn't been for the law suit, I would not have found Zotero. I have been complaining for years about Endnote, but was unwilling to go LaTeX/BibTeX all of the way, and had been paying for endnote, and using Microsoft Word. With Zotero, I got completely changed over to OpenOffice on all platforms.

    So, Thanks for the law suit.