Analysis Says Planes Might Be Greener Than Trains
New Scientist has an interesting piece up about the calculable energy costs per mile for various forms of transportation. Despite the headline ("Train can be worse for climate than plane"), the study it describes deals with highway-based vehicles, too: the authors attempted to integrate not just the cost at the tailpipe (or equivalent) for each mode of transport, but also the costs of developing and supporting the associated infrastructure, such as rails, highways and airports. Such comparisons are tricky, though; a few years back, a widely circulated report claimed that the Toyota Prius had a higher per-mile lifetime cost than the Hummer (see that earlier Slashdot post for good reason to be skeptical of the methodology and conclusions). I wonder how the present comparison would be affected by a calculation of (for instance) how much it would cost to move by plane the freight currently carried by trains.
Last post... so far...
Enough is enough! I have had it with these great-grandmother-fuckin' trolls on this great-grandmother-fuckin' plane!
Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
...unless it was Air France A330.
Too soon?
If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a wagon.
is my marijuana cigarette with 2 grams of cannabis rolled up by cheap cigar paper. also known in the streets as a "blunt".
this is a sentence for the blunted, use linux for it is created by god!
told reporters, BSD machines 3ay. It used to be Result of a quarrel a GAY NIGGER thing for the Channel, you might
Analysis says Spinning Heel Kick to the body more painful than Overhand Right to the face.
Conclusion: avoid Spinning Heel Kick.
I'd like to see someone ignite thermite on a plane in mid air. It would burn a hole through the bottom of the plane and rain down on the ground burning through whatever trees/cars/houses/people that are unlucky enough to be below it. Birdie, birdie, in the sky...