Slashdot Mirror


Senator Applauds Pirate Bay Trial, Chides Canada

eldavojohn writes "Republican Senator Orrin Hatch spoke Tuesday at the World Copyright Summit in Washington DC and hailed the Pirate Bay guilty verdict as an important victory. He expressed severe disappointment in Canada for showing up on our watch list for piracy next to China and Russia. Senator Hatch also said, 'In fact, one study reports that each year, copyright piracy from motion pictures, sound recordings, business and entertainment software, and video games costs the US economy $58 billion in total output, costs American workers 373,375 jobs and $16.3 billion in earnings, and costs federal, state, and local governments $2.6 billion in tax revenue. During this time of economic turmoil, we must ensure that all copyrighted works, both here and abroad, are protected from online theft and traditional physical piracy. After all, US copyright-based industries continue to be one of America's largest and fastest-growing economic sectors.' GamePolitics notes that for his 2006 campaign, Hatch was rented for $7,000 by the RIAA and also got on his knees for $12,640 from the MPAA."

25 of 526 comments (clear)

  1. Not a Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If someone download a movie, game or song doesn't mean they would have paid for it if they couldn't. So those loss calculations are wrong

    1. Re:Not a Loss by SomeJoel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this any different from you walking into a supermarket and saying, "this steak isn't worth $12, I'm going to shoplift it and eat it anyhow."

      Well, in that case, nobody else is able to pay for and eat the $12 steak. Copying a movie does not reduce anyone else's ability to pay for the same movie.

      --
      <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
    2. Re:Not a Loss by dc29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is this thing call the internet that allows you to search for and find reviews of games, movies, and just about anything else you want.

      Yes because reviews are *NEVER* biased. How many stories we get regularly that X game site/magazine reviews are paid by the game publisher? Or how many reviews are forced to make a steaming shitpile of a game look good because game publisher would than withdraw ad funding (basically being bullied into good reviews)?

      When I can take a game/CD/DVD I bought and bring it back to the store for refund because it's a steaming pile of male cow feces, then I will never *EVER* download illegally anything.

  2. American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe he admitted it. "After all, US copyright-based industries continue to be one of America's largest and fastest-growing economic sectors."

    Next thing you know he'll say, "And if they won't buy our opium, we will sail our ironclads right into their harbours and open up their markets, whether they like it or not."

    1. Re:American Imperialsm w/ Entertainment Media? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More specifically, the problem with intangible goods is that they only have the value because the law creates an artificial scarcity. The only incentive for a foreign nation to respect the legal framework that makes our intangible goods scarce is the threat of reprisal. This reprisal can come in the form of a trade barrier, but when we're left with only intangible exports, the threat of a trade barrier really has no teeth.

      The other reprisal, of course, is military. I'm deeply afraid that we'll end up using force to bully other nations into giving our intangible goods value. We all know how that game ends.

  3. makes me proud to be a canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets face it,

    If as a society you are pissing off a modern US Republican, you have to be doing something right.

    1. Re:makes me proud to be a canadian by Faulkner39 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doing something right would piss off a US Democrat, doing something left would get you mad mod points on slashdot.

    2. Re:makes me proud to be a canadian by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm no Republican, and I happen to hate the party. But, I do find it amazing that an AC making a fairly uninteresting anti-Republican comment can be modded up so quickly. Are you people so anxious to show off our political viewpoint? Are you not aware that liberals have been just as guilty of courting the RIAA and MPAA and conservatives? Who can remember Senator Disney?

  4. $58 billion saved! by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's an incredible saving. That money can be used to fix broken windows everywhere.

  5. Re:Well... by spacefiddle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, i love how in business can you count "money we never got or even came close to seeing" as a "loss."

    This one time, i was in a convenience store, and i saw someone else had won a million dollars in a lottery. I didn't have an extra dollar on me for a lottery ticket at the time, since the public transit token machine ate one of my dollars. Ergo, PUBLIC TRANSIT COST ME A MILLION DOLLARS!!11!1

    oh wait, that 'extra' dollar would have gone to something useful with value to me... not a lottery ticket.

    /facepalm

  6. So the Senator is applauding corrupt trials... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure glad that he is a senator then. I would love to see how he would feel if he was convicted in a trial and it turned out that the Judge was a high ranking member of the puppeteers of the prosecutor. Talk about trying to stack the deck. I know lets make sure the Judge is on our side and already believes us, that will make it much easier to make sure the outcome is the one we want.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  7. Some things the Senator needs to understand. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some things the Senator needs to understand:

    1/ Other countries are INDEPENDENT and the United States has no authority to dictate to them.

    2/ Industry funded studies designed to "prove" their viewpoint cannot be trusted.

    3/ Copyright under the U.S. Constitution was not intended to be eternal. It was supposed to be for a limited time and I suspect that "limited" was meant in compared to the human life span not compared to eternity.

    3/ The DMCA is bad law and should be repealed rather than encouraging others to implement the same

  8. On that note by LSDelirious · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is estimated that the US printing industry lost Eleventy Billion Dollars in book sales last year from all those freeloading bastards reading at their local public library, which also contributed to heavy losses in the paper manufacturing industry....

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
  9. False statistics by TropicalCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been thoroughly debunked by Professor Michael Geist a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law.

  10. damn Democrats, whores to Hollywood! by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...oh, wait. This Orrin Hatch, who.voted for the DMCA along with the rest of the Gopasaurs. Both parties suck on IP issues.

    1. Re:damn Democrats, whores to Hollywood! by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sonny Bono, Hatch, both parties? There is only one party.

      They are Legion, they are many.

      I see little difference between Clinton, Bush, Obama, Carter, etc.

      I see 1 party. The "Goverment as a Business" party whom we shall now refer to as the GAAB party comprising two idealogies:

      Left: The Goverment Controls Business
      Right: Business Control the Goverment

      but either way THEY CONTROL YOU.

      Seriously this partisan nonsense has to end, neither party has shown any credibitity in over 80 years and have done nothing for the nation as a whole, rather they have done plenty for themselves.

      When the USA stopped making real things and moved to a service economy the only thing we have left is our imaginary property that was long ago only supposed to be protected for 7 years has turned into a generation spanning con game with society at large losing in the end.

      Now as that society rebels watch carefully as the GAABs show their true colors.

      It is modern Feudalism with Goverment as the King and the large corporations as the fiefs. It's employees are the pesants\cattle and we can see the bloodlines clear as day now in both the Corporate spheres as well as in the media.

      I will coin a term if it hasn't already:

      The United States form of goverment is "Corporate Feudalism"

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  11. Lack of Understanding of Economics? by jayme0227 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, maybe I'm not the brightest bulb on the tree, but if Americans aren't spending money on mp3s and downloaded movies, aren't they instead spending that money elsewhere? We have one of the lowest savings rates in the world, so it's not like the money is disappearing into our savings accounts. Therefore, downloading content on the internet should theoretically cost the economy $0 and $0 jobs, or at least considerably less than the figures quoted in the article, and instead create new jobs in other sectors rather than lining the pockets of movie execs. Then again, this whole philosophy is moot if nobodyâ(TM)s following the Pirates Code of Honor and buying content that is actually good.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  12. Orin Hatch doesn't understand the law by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The crux of the problem with "the pirate bay convictions" is that they aren't being properly tried under local law. The fact that they had their stuff seized and then returned to them should have been indication enough that the problem isn't with the pirate bay's activities, but with the local laws. Their present conviction is quite wrongful.

    Hatch rather reminds me of my ex-wife who believed that anything that made her angry must be against the law and so was inclined to call the police to resolve it. Hatch, of course, is one of the bought and paid for politicians and I simply can't believe anyone is taking him seriously any more... well okay, I can believe it simply because the general masses still don't get what is wrong with current copyright law and process... and definitely don't get that different countries have different ideals and standards of law.

    I would have been an interesting turn of things if the U.S.S.R. was able to peddle its influence to have other nations change their laws the way the U.S. does. And outside of the U.S. I am fairly certain that the practice is both unappreciated and unwelcome. It is probably one of the larger reasons the U.S. is presently disliked in the world.

  13. I know $19k sounds like a lot of money... by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but it's a drop in the bucket in a senate election. So while I am just as annoyed at Senator Hatch as the next geek, I think accusing him of being bought is probably tactically stupid. First, because it's probably not true. Second, because there's probably another reason he holds this particular position. And third, because he probably actually believes what he's saying.

    There are two ways to get him to stop being such a powerful advocate for copyright interests. One is to get him replaced. The other is to get him to change his mind. Getting him replaced is going to be really, really hard. But by all means, go for it. Only I really doubt the average Utahn is going to vote him out on the basis of his position on copyright, even if they disagree with him. So that's a really big job.

    The other possibility is that you could get him to come around to seeing how much economic damage the RIAA and MPAA positions are doing to our economy. I think that's pretty hard too. But maybe not impossible. But one thing that is impossible is that you will get him to even listen to you if you start talking about how he's blowing the MPAA to get campaign contributions. The electoral system works the way it works. I want it to change as much as you do. But it's not going to change because you make nasty accusations. It's going to change because you work for it, or not at all.

    1. Re:I know $19k sounds like a lot of money... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The other possibility is that you could get him to come around to seeing how much economic damage the RIAA and MPAA positions are doing to our economy.

      Part of the problem comes from how you think about economics. Some people think, "whatever is very most profitable for the most businesses," is the definition of "good for the economy". Those companies can then hire more people, invest in things, etc. This seems to be the way Hatch is seeing things, and it's not at all uncommon, even among Democrats.

      On the other hand, you might say, "greater efficiency is better for the economy." Cut down on all the red-tape, bureaucracy, and middlemen and it will free up more real wealth to be spent on things that are actually beneficial. You can think of it like a forest fire. We used to prevent small forest fires because they were dangerous, but then we found out that smaller forest fires clear out some excess growth, fertilize the soil, and prevent the next forest fire from getting too out of control. Similarly, allowing some economic destruction can clear out bad business models, free up capital for better investments, and prevent economic downturns from getting quite so ugly.

      Now if you're a believer in the second idea, then you might not be all that interested in protecting our entertainment industry, regardless of how much money they're making. Online distribution means much less waste. There's no packaging, no transportation costs, no storage/shelving costs, and no waste of unsold products. It's a much more efficient model, which is an economic boon whether or not these particular businesses can figure out how to profit from it.

      Either way, I'm a bit uneasy about the implication that our economy is reliant on our entertainment industry. It'd be nice if our economy was built on actual production of goods, and not on copyright enforcement.

  14. Re:OK republican shills by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In all the brouhaha from the payout, to wall street vs main, TARP, GM, Chryseler, Sotamayor, and great big plans for the new Health care... if the Republicans couldn't find something to take a stand on, anything ... then they deserve what they get. Outvoted and silenced. I find it odd, from news a few weeks back that the recognized "voice of the Republican party" is Rush Limbaugh; and Mr. Limbaugh is a self-proclaimed "non-party" conservative. Is there is point in defending Republicans? Sadly, they are leaderless, clueless, and helpless. I have faith in conservatism, but no faith in Republicans to bring about conservatism.

  15. Re:OK republican shills by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sadly, they are leaderless, clueless, and helpless.

    That's what people said about the Democrats before they were able to adopt "Hey, at least we're not Bush!" as their slogan.

  16. Re:Well... by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take it a step farther, and think of how much money the record industry could make if they could just impose an arbitrary tax on all people! There are, what, 300 million people in the US? Assume each person really should be buying 10 albums a year (whether they want them or not) at $20 per CD, and the RIAA can pull down $60 billion a year. Think of how good that would be for the economy!

    I mean, if we're going to absolve the industry from having to provide a service that people want to pay for, then we may as well go in whole hog.

  17. Re:OK republican shills by cml4524 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, yes, the old "no true scotsman" argument. Standby of the man who's lost every rationale he ever had to defend what means the most to him.

    Republicans spent many years villifying anyone who dared to disagree with them on any issue while elevating filth such as Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck to spokespersons and role models for their movement.

    Republicans opened religious and geopolitical extremists with open arms which relegated all the moderates to Independence or pushed them into the democratic party. They elected a stuttering buffoon who drove the country deep into debt with nothing to show for it, destroyed our standing with the rest of the world as a beacon of hope and leadership, and forced a division of loyalties not seen in this country for nearly 50 years.

    For their troubles they've been pushed to the fringe by a reliably moderate majority of Americans who have had enough with their extremist views and tactics. Now the republicans are finding that fearmongering and hate only go so far before people get wise to those antics and reject them for more intelligent and useful ideas.

    The republicans made this bed. Now they can lie in it until they decide to clean up their act and start acting in a responsible and adult manner again. Or, they can die and let a more thoughtful and reasonable opposition to the democrats replace them. Either way, the republicans are what they are, and it's rapidly sending them to the abyss of irrelevance.

    All that said, democrats in this thread bashing Hatch because of the R next to his name would do well to remember that our democratic vice president is pretty friendly to the same people Hatch is, and our president is staffing key legal positions with ex-lawyers from the types of firms that would be more than happy to prosecute torrent users and hosters on American soil the way the Pirate Bay was tried.

  18. Re:OK republican shills by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or the republicans can just wait for the democrats to f' it all up and have the pendulum swing back the other way.

    The problem is that anytime one side 'wins' they think it gives them 'a mandate' to push any and all of their policies regardless of how extremist they are. This inevitably always backfires and ends with the other party in power once again.