Slashdot Mirror


Is China Creating the World's Largest Botnet Army?

david_a_eaves writes "The Chinese government is mandating that all computers sold in China come with Internet blocking software. Rob Cottingham writes an excellent piece noting how the censorship application of this software should be the least of our concerns. This new software may create an opportunity for the Chinese Government to appropriate these computers and use them to create the worlds largest botnet army." Update: 06/11 21:26 GMT by T : J. Alex Halderman writes "My students and I have been examining the Green Dam censorware software. We've found serious vulnerabilities that can be exploited by any web site a user visits with the software installed. We also found that some of the blacklists seems to have been taken from the American-made filtering program CyberSitter. We've posted a report and demo."

32 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Correct me if I am wrong... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would it be easier to just sever the undersea fibre cable to China if it's really such a grave threat?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is economic warfare. The question is which is worth more economically to the US, a connection to China which opens Chinese citizens to the world's press or severing the connection and avoiding any potential complications.

      So the question is which one is worth more? Personally im willing to bet that being connected to them is worth more to the US than it is to China.

    2. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's spelled both ways fuckwad.

    3. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by markkezner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you do cut the cable, the traffic will try to route around the damage, clogging the "tubes" elsewhere and disrupting a lot of services.

      --
      Dangerous, sexy, turing complete: Femme Bots
    4. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be easy for the people buying the computers to wipe the hard drive and install their own software, without the internet blocking software on it?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just in time inventory? Using China as a supplier? Sorry, not happening without a middleman. Shipping isn't reliable enough, unless you are using air and paying out the nose. Unless your JIT means something different to you than to my customers (several my of my customers have NO warehousing space, they need parts for their assemblies when they need them - any earlier and they can't store them, any later and they have a worker doing nothing).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  2. geographically centralized Botnet by Yo_mama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should make it easier to block during an attack....

    --
    Never understimate the power of human stupidity -Lazarus Long
  3. Re:It is a problem by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For the sake of argument, lets assume the transit providers drop China's interconnects. 0% CPU overhead.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  4. A China based botnet army only threatens China by kawabago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All we have to do is filter them out at our end of the intercontinental cables and the army can't get in here. The same applies to everyone else so a Chinese botnet army only threatens China.

  5. Or just block their IP space by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason botnets are so effective is they are distributed. When they come from all over the place, you have to do a ton of individual blocks. If they are all from the same IP space, ok just black hole China's space and that's it. Wouldn't take a block from very many top level providers and they'd be doing nothing at all.

  6. A botnet that lives within one's own borders... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...would seem to have some serious limitations.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  7. Re:Yawn by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "it could build one in "traditional" way using viruses etc."

    yea, it's a huge vector for launching a traditional attack though. It hasn't got to go boom on day one, the attack could begin silently by spreading crap slowly over the course of years.

    Other than that, I'm guessing Chinese Wikipedians are crapping themselves over this news.

    --
    Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  8. Re:It is a problem by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be able to block, at the very least the packet header has to be examined. If remote attacker can generate packets faster than you can examine and drop them, you've just been DoS'ed.

    You also have to look at the packet header in the course of regular routing decisions. Would it really take more CPU to look at the packet header and drop it into /dev/null than it does to look at the packet header and send it out a different network interface?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  9. Re:It is a problem by caladine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You also have to look at the packet header in the course of regular routing decisions. Would it really take more CPU to look at the packet header and drop it into /dev/null than it does to look at the packet header and send it out a different network interface?

    That's not what really causes the extra CPU usage. It's the sheer volume of the packets you now have to handle. It's not as if these botnet computers are generating traffic like the would during a normal transaction. They're transmitting as fast as they can.

  10. No, the typo is yours by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, all your computer belong to someone who wants to harm China. This is more of a threat to China itself, than anyone else.

    From a point of view outside China, this botnet is not distributed. It all shares a few links (possibly saturating them if the botnets gets too crazy), shares netblocks, etc. This botnet isn't capable of doing anything that the Great Firewall operators aren't already able to do.

    From a point of view inside China, the botnet is distributed and its crap looks like it's coming from everywhere.

    All your computer are belong to US.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  11. Re:It is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, we need to rethink being so close to our adversaries online. I mean, isn't that obvious?
    It's like we're waiting for the cyber-911 (god that's terrible) before we have the mandate to act.

    They have to come over the same sets of pipes. You can't get around that.
    At some point, you can shut off mega.undersea.cable01 and all traffic stops.
    Cut the ties that bind the C&C with the bots, and monitor what happens next.

    If sh!t hit hit the fan, the USAF/NSA/??? would step in and do this. The question is,
    under what circumstances, and what good does that do us in the long term?

    You can't disconnect CN forever. This problem will remain as long as we're tied to them.
    If we treat our enemies as trusted friends and get screwed, whose fault is it? Exactly.
    I think there's a word for this in Cantonese, but my pronunciation suffers.

  12. Re:And Windows? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Already done. They call it Windows Update.

  13. Re:oOooo Scary! by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And if they're running pirated, unpatched copies of windows, equally as fragile.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  14. Re:The "least of our worries" ? by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I would have the rest of the world do about it is escalate "it" from the "least of their worries" to something just a bit higher.

    --
    Whale
  15. Re:The "least of our worries" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Iranians are in a democratic process to elege a new presidente.

  16. Re:Look.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't even need to cut the cables. They have to come out somewhere.. switch the routers off.

    If you can't do that, advertise high priority routes so that all traffic to china gets null routed (they can do the same to you, theoretically, if they get in first).

  17. Re:while of course this is fud by Drake42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TRUST NO ONE!

    DO NOT TRUST THE CHINESE! (But eat their food, wear their clothes, use their electronics)
    DO NOT TRUST THE USA! (But obey their laws, enjoy their movies, work for their money)
    DO NOT TRUST THE IRANIANS (But ignore their democratic progress and ignore their people's work for peace)

    Here's the real answer:
    DO NOT TRUST YOURSELF, because you're an idiot.

    Distrust is for the weak. Optimistic skepticism and honest effort are for the strong.

  18. Re:It is a problem by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can be DOSd with legitimate traffic just as easily as a botnet. Too many packets is too many packets.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  19. Re:The "least of our worries" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really? The Iranians have the opportunity to vote out Kammenei? That's news to everyone on planet Earth!

    Achmenuttyjob is the Iranian government's equivalent to White House press sceretary Gibbs.

  20. Re:while of course this is fud by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good advice. I'll trust no one. I don't trust you. Horrible advice. I'll trust everyone.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  21. Re:The "least of our worries" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You got it, buddy. Anything else?

  22. Re:That would be like... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would you assume they actually moderated in the first place, rather than simply claimed that they did in order to make Teh Funny?

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  23. Re:It is a problem by ZigiSamblak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. Aren't we supposed to be the experts at that here at slashdot?

  24. Let's be charitable by wytcld · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Chinese government obviously understands their people better than we do. No other government anywhere, at any time in human history, has directly controlled so many people as the current Chinese government. Success counts for something. Obviously in some basic ways they're brilliant at being a government.

    So let's grant for argument that they're telling the truth: That pornography is among the most dire current threats to the continuity of their control of their population. We need to get funding from our own government to build a massive distributed porn collection, that in times of crisis can be forwarded by every available channel and modality to China. Thus can we destroy them!

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  25. Did Japan already do this? by Kineel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This reminds me of the 60's when there were actually people who believed that all of those little Japanese cars were programmed to fall apart when a signal came from Tokyo. We'd be stuck with no transportation and Japan would finally win the war.

    I'm not saying this couldn't be done with computer software today. But obviously paranoia isn't limited by technology.

    --
    -- Should there be smoke coming out of my CPU?
  26. Nope, it's this simple: by mynickslongerthanurs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1, Get 'elected' as high government official at the Industrial and Information Department.
    2, Start your own company (using someone else's name of course) selling filter software (with OpenCV (BSD licensed) binary lib without any proper credit).
    3, Win the contract in the government <sarcasm>public bidding</sarcasm>.
    4, Enjoy mandatory installation across the country.
    5, The one-year free trial expires.
    6, ???
    7, PROFIT!

  27. Re:M$ made largest botnet, Cisco the next Echelon by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No worries! Patriotic Chinese engineers working for Cisco and other companies will insert their own government's backdoors into American products.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!