Slashdot Mirror


Linux To Be First OS To Support USB 3.0

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Neowin.net "Sarah Sharp, a self-styled 'geekess' and Linux developer at Intel's Open Source Technology Center who has recently been working on the Linux USB subsystem, announced on her blog that support of USB 3.0 will soon be integrated into the Linux kernel. This makes Linux the first operating system to support the standard. If you can't wait and have the expertise necessary, she includes instructions on how to get USB 3.0 support in Linux now." Here's Sharp's post.

10 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. Any USB 3.0 hardware? by moon3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?

    1. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Devices, I would be more concerned about finding a hardware adaptor to install into your computer first. The devices come after you have something you can plug them into.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware? by sorak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?

      Mod me troll if you want, but the majority of the devices won't come until Windows has USB 3.0 support.

  2. Poor naming by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"

    Who keeps on doing this!! Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.
    Ditto for fast ethernet.

  3. It means almost nothing by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I may have to preface this with the fact that I am a hard core Linux user. I run Mac OS on the wife's machines. I have a WindowsXP VM. That's about it for me personally. I use Linux exclusively and favorably. But what I have to say is the objective truth the way I see it... objectively.

    It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers. It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support. Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!"

    Linux isn't entitled to bragging rights of any kind. Sure we have snazzy 3D OpenGL desktops with cubes and spheres. Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far). There are lots of games natively written for Linux though not the ones someone wants to play usually... (No WoW and no chance in hell of an OpenGL version of XWing vs. Tie Fighter....)

    The point is what Linux has is completely unimportant to others... even when they DON'T have it. What is important is what Linux doesn't have.

    Still, I'll chalk this little bullet point up in Linux's favor... but at the same time, none of it matters until really useful USB 3.0 devices are available and at that time there WILL be Windows drivers and support and there WILL be Mac OS X support. "Sure, you had it first... but what could you do with it?"

    (I'll still get modded troll)

  4. For that matter by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There may already be Windows drivers, Microsoft may have simply not released them since, lacking final hardware, that isn't a real useful thing to do. However internally there could well be a driver prepped and ready to go.

  5. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.

    Why exactly? Although not productive anymore, the -ess morpheme is used in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.

    Why does her choice of neologism mean she's a "sub geek?"

  6. Re:Even worse than you can imagine by wampus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was definitely Satan that was behind 667 MHz. Without a doubt. Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer. One or the other. But probably Satan. Also, I think you are probably the kid in class who ate too much paste.

  7. Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?

    For me it boils down to this:
    It is an un-need divide in a culture. Instead of being a group of geeks, we end up creating geeks and geekess's. Which seems to lead to an US v THEM aspect in everything it touches.

    True gender equality doesn't need this artificial line.

    Also, I look at history:
    Princess were inferior to prince, Goddess inferior to God.

    I don't think we need that any more.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Re:Another win for OSS community by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mrs LizardKing once said that she'd attempted sex when she had the painters in,

    As in, not with you? Try using the personal pronoun "I" before you experiment with sex. Disclaimer: my girlfriends and I were younger than menopause when we experimented with period sex. If you can't properly lubricate then just spit on it.

    As if you were just saying, "Half-digested period blood-chunks are brown". Yes, nerds, they are. If you can't handle it then go to Digg and beat your dicks for eternity while the real men turn their women into jelly using their mud tires.