Slashdot Mirror
A Supervolcano Beneath Mt. St. Helens?
We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (not going to blow, 2004; going to blow, 2008). Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt. St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano. The jury is still out on this one. Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report. "Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface. The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena. The currents are stronger when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock. ... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano. About 15 km below the surface, the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material. This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east. It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor. ... [Some researchers] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture. Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock."
Scientists remember that Earth's core is made up of magma, so it only makes sense that alot of it exists...
If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
Judging by the comments posted so far, if it is a super volcano, and it does blow, nothing of value will be lost.
That is all.
Relocation? That's called "TFB".
Look, let me make my position clear: living below flood level is STUPID. Period. I don't want to pay for their levees, or relocation, or rebuilding, or any of it, any more than I would want to pay for somebody who burned their house down by using a turkey fryer indoors. Stupid is stupid.
Personally, I would just consider it evolution in action. The average intelligence of the human race goes up a fraction.
And before you accuse me of being a hypocrite, let me repeat what I wrote elsewhere in this thread: I don't live in a floodzone, or a hurricane zone, or an area that is subject to typhoons, or tsunamis, or dust storms, or earthquakes, or...
If you live in a hurricane zone AND below flood level (on the COAST yet...), then if your property gets flooded, you are not a "victim of a natural disaster" at all. You are a victim of your own stupidity. I'll keep my money and offer no sympathy.
And just let me add this: Louisiana (and New Orleans in particular) politicians took Federal (read: your and my) money, that was supposed to be used to shore up the levees and so on, and spent it instead on their own favorite local pork projects. So, while I don't have ANY sympathy for the flood victims, I would go further and say that those politicians ought to be in prison, if not shot outright.
I normally don't respond to ACs, but my gawd, Bush the first's wife Barbara was ugly as hell, even with an age adjustment.
Verifiable facts? Like the one that says there's an old man with a beard in the sky who thinks you should do this with your swimsuit parts and not that.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."