Slashdot Mirror


Auto Warranty Robocall Scammers Busted

ectotherm writes "The nice people behind the recorded phone messages stating 'By now you should have received your written note regarding your vehicle warranty expiring...' — the ones who instantly hang up when you ask for the name of the company — have been busted. Fox News did a little background digging on the four people charged." Don't know about you, but I received three or four postcards in the mail from these scammers, as well as uncountable robocalls. The FTC says they cleared $10M since 2007.

9 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. My call... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...went something like this.

    "WTH is this? Scammers?"

    *Press 1*

    "Hello, what's the make of your vehicle?"

    "May I ask who I'm speaking to?"

    *click*

    --

    After receiving (and hanging up on) a few more of these calls, I can't say I'm sorry to see their asses getting handed to them in court.

  2. stop them in less than 2 years next time by Dan667 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know I personally received several hundred calls from these guys. I had numerous people tell me they had received the same types of calls. The FTC can stop patting themselves on the back, the fact that it took this long is embarrassing.

  3. Busted only when they bothered someone "important" by foodnugget · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What really bugs me about all this is that despite what were probably thousands of reports to the gov't, nothing was done and nobody really brought it up in the media until they accidentally bothered NY senator Chuck Schumer. Had they not stumbled onto his number, one wonders if they would still be in business.

  4. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by DavidD_CA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yup. I even reported a handful of calls to the FTC (using their website) just a few weeks before Chuck Schumer declared war on these guys.

    I got a letter back from the FTC telling me that they couldn't do anything because "I didn't provide them enough information". I gave them the time of day, the CID, and what the robo greeting said. But I guess because I didn't talk to a human, it didn't count.

    This should be considered a major FAIL for the FTC and the Do Not Call list. Which is a shame, too, because the DNC has been a great success with this exception.

    It's embarassing that it took the FTC this long to catch them, and to add insult to injury, it only took them about a month after Chuck Schumer made a stink.

    I hope that after these criminals are tried, a second investigation starts to find out why the FTC had their head up their ass.

    --
    -David
  5. The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem here is the phone companies. I tried reporting this issue to AT&T a few times, and found them to be singularly disinterested. They wouldn't even tell me who kept calling my cell phone over and over, trying to sell me the same thing over and over. The scammers were clearly robo calling as they didn't know *who* they were calling. I received from a few to several of these calls each week for several months.

    Scams like this undoubtedly generate hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of dollars a year in revenue from long distance and 800 number services, which probably include helping the scam artists hide their contact information from their victims. The phone companies had no interest at all in this problem, even when clearly thousands of legitimate customers complained about it. Not only were they making money from the scammers annoying calls, but the phone company also offered me the chance to pay an additional monthly fee to stop solicitation calls. When I asked point blank, they admitted that the service would not stop the robotic calls about which I'd called to complain. In addition to that, the phone companies were charging air time to victims, when the robotic caller dialed cell phones (like mine).

    The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Never attribute to malice what could more easily be attributed to stupidity."

      The phone techs you talk to when you call AT&T have access to a lot of tools and information you may not have access to, but ultimately, they are limited to handling the kinds of issues they have been trained to handle. Getting new material to these techs takes a long time and a lot of work. Chances are, they didn't help you because they don't know how to respond.

      The revenue these slammers generate is a drop in the bucket compared to legitimate AT&T business. Your average scammer's wet dream would be to pull in the kind of money that a single dial up provider spends on their monthly phone bill.

    2. Re:The Real Problem (The Phone Companies) by hvm2hvm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Never attribute to malice what could more easily be attributed to stupidity."

      I'd go for "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice" since if they get so many complaints but still don't know how to handle them, they obviously don't care enough about customers to try to understand what's going on.

      Allow me a car analogy :P: if you go in the wrong gear in a parking lot and run over someone (because you went in the wrong way) you might say it's not your fault, you're just not that good at thinking. But if you do that 10 times then you may be retarded but you are also not trying to better your driving such that you won't run over people. At that point we're talking about malice.

      --
      ics
  6. Mind what you wish for by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The phone companies, all of them, are complicit in this scam, and should be jointly prosecuted with the scammers.

    No. See "Common Carrier". You really don't want the phone companies to be able to refuse service to anybody...

    The real problem is the government's indifference — took millions of complaints over years for them to enforce the law...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  7. Re:Busted only when they bothered someone "importa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, reporting these guys is usually useless. They spoof the caller ID info (this is where the phone companies should be atomic dope slapped) and the associates, if you get one, are well trained in not telling you anything that would be useful on a report. Full name? Nope. Company name? Nope. Address? Hell no. Return number? Nope.

    In reality, if they were taking it seriously all the FTC would need is your phone number, the time of the call, and your provider. Then they could get records from the provider (ie. AT&T) and know where the call came from, who it's registered to, and so on. The phone companies make damn sure to have that info, because otherwise they couldn't get paid.

    Which, of course, is why the FTC were able to move so fast once Senatorman got called.