Slashdot Mirror


The State of Iran's Ongoing Netwar

An anonymous reader writes "Following disputed elections in Iran, opposition groups and activists have turned conventional protests into a major threat to the ruling government. The low-intensity protest movement is rapidly becoming the first true netwar of the 21st century. Opposition protesters have shown that within a few hours or less, the information technologies that are the mainstay of modern society can become its weapons, as well. This article examines the current situation in Iran and the part played by new media technologies and strategies, showing how far the theory and practice of netwar has advanced since the concept first emerged in the late nineties."

11 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Impressed by arizwebfoot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TFA was one of the best written, well thought out blogs I've ever had the pleasure to read. Indeed JournalSquared should be invited to be an admin here at /.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
  2. any story about this that doesn't mention Fark... by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone that writes a story about this that doesn't mention Fark specifically needs to do a bit more research on the subject. Tats(uma) obviously gets quite a bit of credit, but he wasn't the only person there keeping up with the tweets. Fark (and oddly, 4chan) became major filters for finding the real data for the first several days. I'm amazed at the people who still don't know there's effectively a civil war going on in Iran, since CNN and other mainstream media didn't really start reporting on it until yesterday.

    The other bit is, because mainstream media has to hedge their bets - they have something to lose, where sites like Fark aren't even media sites, so they have nothing to lose - CNN and such has to worry about whether the dissidents will be successful. Because if they aren't, then you've pissed off the people still in power. Media blockout is one thing, but there was reliable reports of many deaths long before MSM was reporting there being only a single death.

    BTW, Iranians still need proxies for their twitter updates. If you have the ability...

    Also, one of the ways people have been trying to make it more difficult for the Iranian police to track down dissidents is by changing their twitter location and timezone to that of Tehran. Feel free to do that too.

    But yeah, twitter is the only thing able to make it out right now, considering.

  3. Re:Freedom for Iran! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think meddling would probably be the worst thing to do. What is Obama going to do? March troops in? Bomb Tehran? Drop propaganda? I think just about any direct US involvement can only work to the regime's favor at this point.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. Re:Freedom for Iran! by epiphani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is actually quite simple:

    Nothing

    Seriously, stay out of it. The Iranian government is already accusing the US of interfering in internal issues, and has lodged an official complaint through diplomatic channels. This is mostly propaganda, but honestly the best thing we can do for them is to stay out of it.

    In fact, if you see your local politician wanting to do something, tell them to shut up. You're not friends to the people of Iran, and speaking up with your opinion is something they don't want to hear.

    --
    .
  5. A state being able to defend itself less by kyliaar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    against an irate populace is something that is one of the main pillars of our constitution.

    The Declaration of Independance and the Right to Bear Arms were both very much about this. Basically, the Bill of Rights as a whole was meant to shore up the rights of the populace to defend itself against an abusive government.

    It is very interesting to see that the Internet has changed the battlefield enough to level it in certain areas. Really since the mechanization of warfare, no populace could really effectively stand up to the military might of a state.

  6. Re:Freedom for Iran! by oneirophrenos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're not friends to the people of Iran, and speaking up with your opinion is something they don't want to hear.

    We don't need to speak our opinions, we just have to help the Iranian people voice theirs.

  7. Re:Freedom for Iran! by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Besides, if you want real democracy in the Middle East this is the best thing you could possibly hope for; thousands of Iranians marching in the streets demanding to be heard. The Iranian people, it would seem, actually want this to happen for themselves, as opposed to someone else doing it for them. The US should keep lines of communication open when they have jurisdiction over them, say to the world 'We sure hope the rightfully elected leader will come out on top', and stay the hell out of it.

  8. Re:Freedom for Iran! by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great idea ... because arming opposition groups has never turned out badly for the United States in the past.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  9. Re:Listen... by grcumb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone who thinks they are helping by siding with the Iranian opposition has a very poor understanding of Iranian politics. It doesn't matter whether it's from the government or whether it's from regular Western citizens, helping the opposition figures does not help the United States in any way. It just puts a different face on the same anti-Western government.

    1. I'm not American.
    2. Even if I were American, why would I not want to support democracy in principle, even if the results weren't in my favour?
    3. Even if I were only interested in Realpolitik, wouldn't I rather deal with a legitimately elected government than an illegitimate one? Legitimate governments tend to be more moderate and more, uh, sane.
    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  10. Re:Fark by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Posting of relevant Twitter messages to keep everyone informed.

    It's been said before, but if this ends up working, we can't say twitter is completely useless anymore.

  11. Re:Fark by BakaHoushi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    May I still be allowed to say that "Twitter is almost, usually, completely useless?"

    At the very least I'd like to be allowed to still throw my shoes at the TV every time I hear some new show/news report based on it.