Slashdot Mirror


EU Fusion Experiment's Financial Woes Get More Concrete

fiannaFailMan writes "An international plan to build a nuclear fusion reactor is being threatened by rising costs, delays and technical challenges. 'Emails leaked to the BBC indicate that construction costs for the experimental fusion project called Iter have more than doubled. Some scientists also believe that the technical hurdles to fusion have become more difficult to overcome and that the development of fusion as a commercial power source is still at least 100 years away. At a meeting in Japan on Wednesday, members of the governing Iter council will review the plans and may agree to scale back the project.' Iter will be a Tokamak device, a successor to the Joint European Torus (JET) in England. Meanwhile, an experiment in fusion by laser doesn't seem to be running into the same high profile funding problems just yet."

1 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Pure Fusion power generation is a pipe dream by Jeng · · Score: 0, Troll

    We have two working examples of fusion generation, the Hydrogen Bomb that uses a fission device to jump start it and the Sun which is hugely radioactive.

    So our two working examples of fusion generation require fission.

    I would think that the future of fusion generation would be a component of fission generation.

    You can have fission on its own, you can have fission and fusion together, but you can't have fusion on its own in any way that's economical.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.