Harvard Study Says Weak Copyright Benefits Society
An anonymous reader writes "Michael Geist summarizes
an important new study on file sharing from economists Felix
Oberholzer-Gee and Koleman Strumpf. The Harvard Business School working paper
finds that given the increase in artistic production along with the
greater public
access conclude that 'weaker copyright protection, it seems, has
benefited society.' The authors point out that file sharing may not
result in
reduced incentives to create if the willingness to pay for
'complements' such as concerts or author speaking tours increases."
You want media companies to run stories on how copyright might be bad?
Email me privately, I've got an offer you'll be interested in.
No sig today...
Carve a statue. Nobody forced you to create with a medium that can be digitally reproduced.
Really? And here I was under the impression that "politics" stems from "poly" meaning many, and "ticks" meaning "little blood sucking pests".
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder.
"I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
I've scanned your signed picture and posted it on bittorrent. Enjoy!
This space up for sale.
Holy crap, you're using a comparison with the oil industry to strengthen your argument for copyright? That's kinda like saying murder is OK because we have wars.