Slashdot Mirror


Bozeman, MT Drops Password Info Requirement

mcmoodle writes "Bozeman, Montana has decided that they don't want applicant personal information after all, citing a worldwide backlash on the issue: '"Effective at noon today the city of Bozeman permanently ceased the practice of requesting that candidates selected for positions under a provisional job offer to provide their usernames or passwords for candidates' internet sites," said Chris Kukulski, Bozeman City Manager. ... Kukulski says after a 90 minute staff meeting held earlier today, officials decided asking applicants to provide their passwords to sites such as Facebook or MySpace, "exceeded that which is acceptable to our community." Kukulski apologized for the negative impact the issue has generated from news organizations and blogs around the world.' I didn't have any doubt this would be immediately squashed. Now I'm just curious as to how many personal accounts they actually went through!"

5 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, worldwide backlashes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What else can we start worldwide backlashes against? They seem to fucking work.

  2. Fascinating... by Sorthum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting that they declare the passwords they've already received to be the "property of the city."

    Bodes not well, that's for sure-- and it shows that the city still doesn't "get it." They likely just know that a lot of people got very upset, and figured they'd back away from something they just don't grasp...

  3. Re:If you have nothing to hide... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, this is not a cabinet position. This is fucking Bozeman, Montana, which no one had heard of until they pulled this stunt.

    Second, who watches the watchers?

    Third, define "nothing to hide"? As a simple example, I don't think my body is horrible, though it could certainly be better. That doesn't mean I want to be strip-searched to get on the bus to go to work.

    It's not about whether you have anything "suspicious" worth hiding. It's about whether you have anything you'd consider private. There's a reason privacy is part of the universal declaration of human rights.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  4. Re:Change Password by selven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or do the same without the hassle of changing your password by just lying. It's not like they'll subpoena records just to see if your password actually changed (and if it did, why did you fail to notify them?)

  5. Re:Myths and History by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it's more like "Well, even the FBI, which not the most "privacy conscious" of organizations, thinks that accessing someone's personal accounts without their permission (or a warrant, or special PATRIOT act permission) is a crime."

    Heh.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.