Slashdot Mirror
Could We Beam Broadband Internet Into Iran?
abenamer writes "Some reporter at a recent White House press briefing just asked the White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, this question: Was 'the White House....considering beaming broad capability into Iran via satellite so the opposition forces would be able to communicate with themselves and the outside world?' 'Gibbs said he didn't know such a thing was possible. (Is it?) But he said he would check on the technological feasibility and get back with an answer.' I'm not sure what the reporter meant by beaming broadband into Iran: Do they even have 3G? Would we bomb the Iranians with SIM cards that would allow them to get text messages from the VOA? Or somehow put up massive Wi-Fi transmitters from Iraq and beam it into Iran? How would you beam broadband into Iran?"
Maybe people will change their mind or maybe they won't, either way you'll be covered.
Because, if you choose not to do anything, they will call that meddling as well. You are damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Since we're not talking about an invasion, but merely enabling the communications of a people, that's entirely consistent with what should be American values. It's the Star Trek solution - useful and non-violent.
This is my sig.
The world has been clamoring for you guys to stop meddling in their affairs and only mind your own. So I suggest that you should do just that: it will cost you nothing and you won't generate any further ill will towards you. What's not to like?
Maybe people will change their mind or maybe they won't, either way you'll be covered.
Pity the US didn't learn to do just that in 1941.
Well, I guess I can think of a continent that twice should be happy that we "meddled" in their affairs as well as several countries that have half of their population happy that we again "meddled" in their affairs. I will leave out the whole Eastern Bloc countries including Russia for the sake of brevity.
Now regarding Iran, we, the US, are pretty darn certain that the opposition leader is really no better than the current leader. What we object to is that a select few individuals in Iran have decided the outcome of the election regardless of the general population or even their laws on elections (whether we like the results or the people elected).
You are human garbage, and even that is far more response than you merit.
Before you beam broadband internet into Iran, would you please beam broadband internet into the United Gulags of America.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Yours In Technology,
Kilggore Trout, C.I.O.
"For one thing, this isn't a popular uprising. It's taking place in a liberal city and is mostly students (although not entirely)."
the protests are not by a few iranian hippies. this is a gross distortion of the facts of the wide appeal this uprising has across all demographic groups
"It's currently Iran's problem and it should be up to the Iranian people to resolve it, not for the outside to decide what they think is best for them."
good. so shut up and stop trying to characterize what is going on iran as anything else but a genuine, vast, multidemographic uprising
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Very few people, if you ask me, touched jail.
Lots of others, say, Father Bush, just swam through the whole thing untouched, when it was, and still is, pretty obvious this was his doing.
NO SIG
I think Oliver North spent a few nights at a retreat^H^H^H^H^H^H^H jail before getting his own show on FOX.
I wonder how those people would feel if some other nation decided to start beaming kiddie porn into the U.S. to combat that repressive regime.
Let Iranians sort out what is best for Iran for crying out loud.
"A student who's participated in the protests does not make for an authoritative and unbiased report..."
oh, but some western asshole on a comment board does
gee, maybe you're arguing out of stubborn ignorance at this point?
you've been proven absolutely wrong. the protests are NOT just in tehran, they are all over the country. they are men, they are women, they are young, they are old, they are devout, they are westernized
that's the fucking truth
now if you're not man enough to admit when you are you clearly and wholly wrong, then simply shut up, you ignorant asshole
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Well as soon as you zeppoes regain the right to free assembly where and when you please, and not just in those specially allocated out-of-harm's-way "protest zones", then you can come back to the rest of us and tell us your fucking awesome plans for protecting reporters and protestors in a country you know bugger all about except what you're fed through your talking head news shows. Cause as it stands, your own reporters and protestors get arrested and harrassed at even your own "Democratic" and "Republican" conventions. Mighty fine "democracy" you got there - it's a wonder the whole world doesn't want the same thing already.
Do yourselves a small favour - take that log out of your own eye.
But, I apologise, it's not against you personally, P, I'm just sick of hearing blowhards spout about how we should try and help them fix their shit. All surveys, Iranian and the 1 foreign one, conducted before the elections showed very VERY similar numbers to the official results. But "because we don't like it", more actually of "because we've been told not to like it", we scream blue murder and support the CIA's 400 million dollar disruption campaign.
Get a clue stick, people. It's NOT OUR FUCKING BUSINESS. It's mostly a scare campaign to demonise them "others", so we all feel happy about engaging in warfare, and I''m sure we'll all be greeted with flowers by the cheery happy "free" Iranians. God bless us for saving them from themselves, er, their opressors.
Sure, heard that shit before haven't we ?