NASA Sticking To Imperial Units For Shuttle Replacement
JerryQ sends in a story at New Scientist about the criticism NASA is taking for deciding to use Imperial units in the development of the Constellation program, their project to replace the space shuttle. "The sticking point is that Ares is a shuttle-derived design — it uses solid rocket boosters whose dimensions and technology are based on those currently strapped to either side of the shuttle's giant liquid fuel tank. And the shuttle's 30-year-old specifications, design drawings and software are rooted in pounds and feet rather than newtons and meters. ... NASA recently calculated that converting the relevant drawings, software and documentation to the 'International System' of units (SI) would cost a total of $370 million — almost half the cost of a 2009 shuttle launch, which costs a total of $759 million. 'We found the cost of converting to SI would exceed what we can afford,' says [NASA spokesman Grey Hautaluoma]."
Meanwhile, the entire scientific world sighs at the gringos... again!
No sig for the moment.
I think the $370 million must be in Imperial Units, because since this is all going to be done with money borrowed from China, maybe we should find out what measurement system they're using.
That way when we inevitably have to hock it to them when we default they won't have to change the plans.
I'm a satanic clam.
So it is not easy because you didn't properly archive original files? And how does that reflect on your competence?
Yeah, please don't go metric... In fact, please don't do anything. Seriously, excuses for not modernizing are a million, but most of them amount to - we'd rather not see it come out of our budget in a chunk, we'd rather just keep paying for the rest of our existence.