Slashdot Mirror


The Internet Helps Iran Silence Activists

Hugh Pickens writes "Over the last couple of weeks, those who believe in the transformative power of technology to battle an oppressive state have pointed to Iran as a test case. However, as Farhad Manjoo writes on Slate, the real conclusion about news now coming out of Iran is that for regimes bent on survival, electronic dissent is easier to suppress than organizing methods of the past. Using a system installed last year, built in part by Nokia and Siemens, the government routes all digital traffic in the country through a single choke point, using the capabilities of deep packet inspection to monitor every e-mail, tweet, blog post, and possibly even every phone call placed in Iran. 'Compare that with East Germany, in which the Stasi managed to tap, at most, about 100,000 phone lines — a gargantuan task that required 2,000 full-time technicians to monitor the calls,' writes Manjoo. The effects of this control have been seen over the past couple days, with only a few harrowing pictures and videos getting through Iran's closed net. For most citizens, posting videos and even tweeting eyewitness accounts remains fraught with peril, and the same tools that activists use can be used by the government to spread disinformation. The government is also using crowdsourcing by posting pictures of protesters and asking citizens for help in identifying the activists. 'If you think about it, that's no surprise,' writes Manjoo. 'Who said that only the good guys get to use the power of the Web to their advantage?'"

3 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What they need by sco08y · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    One simple rule that imperial powers tend to forget is that people are nearly always divided against their own government but nearly always united against a foreign invader.

    "Nearly always" is your way of acknowledging that a lot of people, including Obama, have a whole lot of egg on their face about Iraq, and that you know damned well there's a big difference between "invader" and "aggressor."

  2. Re:What they need by causality · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What they need is to have the US and it's pawns to stop threatening to invade, and stop sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the CIA for undercover operations fomenting another coup in that country. As long as they are being verbally and covertly threatened by the hyperpower that has just invaded the country next door -- the same country that invited Saddam to invade them in the 80s -- the hardliners will continue to rule Iran.

    One simple rule that imperial powers tend to forget is that people are nearly always divided against their own government but nearly always united against a foreign invader.

    How to get modded "Flamebait" on Slashdot: suggest that things like coups or terrorism don't just happen in a vacuum.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  3. Re:Embassy Wi-fi? by sparkydevil · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    First of all, we already broadcast radio and TV in the form of the BBC and other foreign satellite channels into Iran.

    Secondly, the Iranian embassy in the US can broadcast to us if they like. I doubt they'd get many followers.

    I presume you are also the kind of person who would stand idly by while your neighbor beats their child. Thankfully others do not suffer from the same moral cowardice.