Slashdot Mirror


Judge Thinks Linking To Copyrighted Material Should Be Illegal

An article at TechCrunch discusses a blog post from Richard Posner, a US Court of Appeals judge, about the struggling newspaper industry. Posner explains why he thinks the newspapers will continue to struggle, and then comes to a rather unusual conclusion: "Expanding copyright law to bar online access to copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, or to bar linking to or paraphrasing copyrighted materials without the copyright holder's consent, might be necessary to keep free riding on content financed by online newspapers from so impairing the incentive to create costly news-gathering operations that news services like Reuters and the Associated Press would become the only professional, nongovernmental sources of news and opinion."

4 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So this implies... by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would, if the anyone clicked on the articles to read them. IF anyone clicked on the articles to read them.
    New at this, aren't we?

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  2. Re:So this implies... by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And since half the articles are dupes, Slashdot is infringing on itself and must self-destruct!

  3. Obligatory link to copyrighted content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  4. Re:So this implies... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hypertext links are just the beginning. We must close the analog hole! Every time someone chats with a friend about the day's news, a poor, helpless newspaper loses money. And God kills a kitten.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.