Slashdot Mirror


Google Mistook Jackson Searches For Net Attack

Slatterz writes "Web giant Google has admitted it thought the sudden spike in searches for Michael Jackson on Thursday was a massive, coordinated internet attack, leading it to post an error page on Google News. The company's director of product management, RJ Pittman, explained that search volume began to increase around 2pm PDT on Thursday and 'skyrocketed' by 3pm, finally stabilising at around 8pm. According to Pittman, last week also saw one of the largest mobile search spikes ever seen, with 5 of the top 20 searches about Jackson. Google wasn't the only site caught out by the extraordinary events. The Los Angeles Times web site also crashed soon after it broke the news of Jackson's death."

19 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. They didn't read Google News? by bignetbuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is all so confusing!

    If Google had read Google News, they would have known about MJs death. But Google didn't and thought they were being attacked...which led them to shutdown their news site...which would have told them about MJ.

    What if this had happened in Soviet Russia?

    1. Re:They didn't read Google News? by game+kid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Michael Jackson would've attacked YOU with "google news" queries!

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:They didn't read Google News? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, when Michael Jackson overdoses, YOU are still dead on the news all next week

  2. It was actually the work of... by BrunoBigfoot · · Score: 5, Funny

    a smooth criminal.

  3. Re:I wonder by basil64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind that every day, month and year that passes increases the ubiquitousness of web enabled devices and services (i.e. twitter, etc.) geometrically. And sad but true, celebrity foibles and deaths are and always have been more fascinating to the masses than any 'real' news.

    --
    ~ Ipsa Scientia Potestas Est ~
  4. Some websites went down... not Google by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen it reported many places that Google was one of the websites that was overwhelmed by traffic resulting from Jackson's death. The fact that this is not true, and that the traffic merely activated Google's self defense mechanisms, is rather enlightening - it reveals just how much more serious Google is. However, we should hope that Google's self defense mechanisms stay this benign, else we may be in trouble when McCartney finally kicks the bucket.

    1. Re:Some websites went down... not Google by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google gave users a CAPTCHA to let them proceed, and for somebody not searching for Michael Jackson news, the site worked normally. That's very different from a complete outage that affects even the non-sheeple users, or even the reduction in features that services like Twitter used to handle the load.

  5. Good for google. by moogied · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as everyone might think this is a big boo-boo by google, I say its a great job done by automated software. All systems should protect themselves from massive peaks in internet traffic in order to provide a base-line service. Twitter even pulled selected services off to keep up a minimum working level. The fact that it classified it as a "net attack" is a matter of terminology, not importance.

    --
    So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    1. Re:Good for google. by Chees0rz · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and forced users searching for Michael Jackson to enter a captcha. I know, I saw it.

      Do you really want to admit that? Wouldn't it be better to claim you were searching for, I don't know, porn or something?

      Getting the Michael Jackson captcha while searching for porn?

      I don't even want to know what those search terms entailed... but I assume the FBI picked them up, too.

  6. Twitter is fragile by JonasH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twitter's infamous 'Fail Whale' was also called into action as servers at the micro-blogging site crashed as 66,000 Tweets were made within a 60-minute period.

    That's it? That's all it takes to bring Twitter to its knees? A measily 18 tweets per second? Do they manually transcribe the messages after having read that an air gap was the most effective security you could get? Or is the article plain wrong.

    Seriously confused here.

    1. Re:Twitter is fragile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thats what happens when your site is based on Ruby...

  7. Re:Am I the only one by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Michael Jackson was a fairly formative musical influence to a lot of modern music. The importance of "Thriller" can't really be overestimated.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  8. Re:I wonder by cetialphav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So maybe instead of a bad reflection on humanity, this is just a bad reflection on the current stability of the intertubes, Google in particular.

    It actually seems to be a good reflection of the current stability of the internet. After all, it worked fine for you and most other people. Sites have gotten much better at handling heavy traffic so it is harder to bring them down. In Google's case, it wasn't so much the amount of traffic as it was misinterpreting what that traffic meant. They thought it was an attack and started playing defence instead of serving it. Once they realized the problem, they could easily handle the volume.

  9. Re:I wonder by agilen · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was a freshman in college, an EE professor put a chart up on the projector. It was a fairly consistent chart with one giant spike right in the middle. He explained this was demand on the US power grid over a period of several months, and asked the class what they thought caused the giant spike...most big world events of the 90s were thrown out by the students....and they were all wrong.

    The spike that put all the country's power plants at full capacity was the announcement of the OJ Simpson verdict.

  10. Re:I wonder by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing about MJ wasn't really that he died but rather the fact that he just randomly died. He was arguably one of the most popular musicians with the general crowd to die since Elvis. Many people got texts, twitter updates, Facebook updates and wondered what exactly was going on. While no one thought MJ was in amazing health, he didn't have cancer or a long illness so many assumed it was a prank so they Googled it to get the info from a reliable source.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  11. TMZ Broke the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TMZ broke the news of his death, not the LA Times. Let's give credit where credit is due.

  12. Re:I wonder by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    The guy could sing and dance, and now he's dead. Turn the page, y'all. There are hella more important things to search for.

    The "attack" was just millions saying "I have no life, you insensitive clod!"

    Google should have returned a custom error page for Michael Jackson searches - either Error 301: Moved Permanently, or Error 410: Gone would have been fine, accompanied by a "Resource Expired: Beat It!" message.

  13. Re:I wonder by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think you are grasping the whole picture, and your post is modded up by the same kind of people who complain that MJ out-twittered Iran for a little while. Do you believe that we are really incapable of being concerned about multiple topics at once? I am, of course, way more concerned for the people in Iran and the conflict that is happening there than I am about MJ's death - but did I search Google after my friend came by my desk that afternoon and said, "Michael Jackson died!" - of course I did! Does that mean I don't care about the coup in Honduras or the sham trial in Burma, or about Obama's new healthcare plans? No. And frankly, that's stupid to even suggest.

    You see, those other things I listed are not surprise, immediate events. Those things are not likely to have caused millions upon millions of people with internet access to suddenly, at the same time, wonder, "is that true?" I'll let you finish thinking about only this post while I go check out some pr0n, read my email, and browse some other news headlines.

    --
    Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
  14. Re:Welcome to Last Week by baegucb · · Score: 5, Funny

    from Consumerist:
    You have to wonder if before going to sleep last night, pitchman Billy Mays thought of Michael Jackson, Farrah Fawcett, and Ed McMahon, and said to himself one last time, "but wait, there's more!"