Slashdot Mirror


First Electronic Quantum Processor Created

ScienceDaily is reporting that the first rudimentary solid-state quantum processor has been created by a team led by Yale University researchers. "Working with a group of theoretical physicists led by Steven Girvin, the Eugene Higgins Professor of Physics & Applied Physics, the team manufactured two artificial atoms, or qubits ('quantum bits'). While each qubit is actually made up of a billion aluminum atoms, it acts like a single atom that can occupy two different energy states. These states are akin to the '1' and '0' or 'on' and 'off' states of regular bits employed by conventional computers. Because of the counterintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, however, scientists can effectively place qubits in a 'superposition' of multiple states at the same time, allowing for greater information storage and processing power."

12 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Lab Site & Papers by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find the lab site here with several papers freely available in pre-publication form on arxiv from the researchers. I'm trying to find the "basic algorithms" the article alludes to that these rudimentary processors can perform. I thought only a handful were applicable (Shor's algorithm) to quantum computing. Anyone know?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  2. Simulating? by immakiku · · Score: 2, Informative

    While each qubit is actually made up of a billion aluminum atoms, it acts like a single atom that can occupy two different energy states.

    Does this sound like they're using real atoms to simulate qubits? Perhaps I'm misinterpretting, but it looks like it's still going to take an exponential amount of resources to "make" each additional qubit.

    1. Re:Simulating? by dlenmn · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's no simulation -- the large group of atoms forms one qubit. That's why this is interesting. Normally, only very small things (like one atom) exhibit quantum behavior. This system is large for something able to exhibit quantum behavior. All the parts effectively join together to act like one quantum system.

  3. Direct PDF Link to Original Paper by GameGod0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/nature08121.pdf

    (For those with access to Nature through school or work...)

  4. Re:This is the day we've been waiting for people! by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not quite yet. FTFA:

    Next, the team will work to increase the amount of time the qubits maintain their quantum states so they can run more complex algorithms. They will also work to connect more qubits to the quantum bus. The processing power increases exponentially with each qubit added, Schoelkopf said, so the potential for more advanced quantum computing is enormous. But he cautions it will still be some time before quantum computers are being used to solve complex problems. "We're still far away from building a practical quantum computer, but this is a major step forward."

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
  5. Re:Problem Solved by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Informative

    That has been long since solved with evolutionary genetics.

    The egg.

    What produced it just happened not to be a chicken. Something close, but not quite.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  6. Re:Does it run Linux? by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Informative

    Obligatory slashdot answer on any topic regarding quantum mechanics: Yes and No.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  7. Re:Article is incorrect. by bostongraf · · Score: 5, Informative

    they did not manufacture "two artificial atoms, or qubits". They manufactured two clusters of atoms that acted as qubits.

    A qubit is not actually a quantum particle. It is a unit of quantum information. Now, do you consider the qubit to be the system or the state?

  8. Re:Most Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Parent is correct (assuming he was making a Bill and Ted reference).
    It would be a time travelling "Police Box" if he'd botched a Doctor Who reference.

  9. Re:The first, really? by smallfries · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes the first. The Dwave guys aren't building quantum computers. Their system lacks entanglement between the qubits, which is essential to running quantum algorithms. They have also been less than forthcoming about the coherence in their system.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  10. Re:Problem Solved by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, no, you've got it backwards.

    A non-chicken laid a chicken egg (i.e. the egg's genes were those of a chicken), from which hatched a chicken.

  11. Re:Bose-einstein condensate? by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The ScienceDaily article and the /. summary seem to be confused on the experimental setup. From the Nature article, "[e]ach qubit has a split Josephson junction...." The Josephson effect is an effect where two superconductors are separated by a very thin insulating layer. A "supercurrent" composed of paired correlated electrons (Cooper pairs) can tunnel across this barrier under certain circumstances. Cooper pairs act as bosons, just as atoms do in Bose-Einstein condensates, so they have long been a focus of research for quantum computing. In this experiment, the device was a "180nm Nb film was d.c.-magnetron sputtered on the epipolished surface of an R-plane corundum wafer," meaning that the superconductor they used was niobium, and the insulator was aluminum oxide, aka corundum. They built it out of these, in other words.

    They go on to mention that the apparatus was cooled to 13 millikelvin using a helium dilution refrigerator. Now, niobium is superconductive to about 9 kelvin in the pure state (and about 23 kelvin in some alloys), so I would assume the extra effort to make it that cold has more to do with preserving the delicate electronic state of the qubits than with merely chilling the superconductors.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."