Slashdot Mirror


Graphene Could Make Magnetic Memory 1000x Denser

KentuckyFC writes "The density of magnetic memory depends on the size of the magnetic domains used to store bits. The current state-of-the-art uses cobalt-based grains some 8nm across, each containing about 50,000 atoms. Materials scientists think they can shrink the grains to 15,000 atoms but any smaller than that and the crystal structure of the grains is lost. That's a problem because the cobalt has to be arranged in a hexagonal close packing structure to ensure the stability of its magnetic field. Otherwise the field can spontaneously reverse and the data is lost. Now a group of German physicists say they can trick a pair of cobalt atoms into thinking they are in a hexagonal close packing structure by bonding them to a hexagonal carbon ring such as graphene or benzene. That's handy because the magnetic field associated with cobalt dimers is calculated to be far more stable than the field in a cobalt grain. And graphene and benzene rings are only 0.5 nm across, a size that could allow an increase in memory density of three orders of magnitude."

3 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Not again! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me guess. They're going to stick this stuff to a platter and spin it past some sort of electromagnet. I want terabyte USB thumb drives, not yet another mechanical storage device.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. Re:How to fill up the storage? by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's a person to do when disk capacities increase by another 3 orders of magnitude?

    Storage requirement is going up, relentlessly:
    VCD = 700Mb
    DVD = 4.7Gb
    Dual-layer Blu-ray = 50Gb (potentially 100Gb; 4 layer @ 25Gb per layer.

    And don't forget that Ch-erman scientists never sleep:-)

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  3. Experiment? by feranick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before I can get excited, I need to know when this is proven experimentally. The FTA refers to a calculation. There are lots of possible things that are achieved with a calculation, but translating it in practice is a totally different matter. BTW, I am an experimentalist nanoscientist (working on graphene, actually), part of my daily job is to prove that computational results can be achieved in reality.