Slashdot Mirror


TSA Asked to Ensure Safety Of Customer Data After Clear Closing

CWmike writes "The chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), has given the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) until July 8 to explain how the agency plans to ensure the security of private data collected by a recently shuttered company that offered a registered traveler program. In a letter to the TSA's acting assistant secretary, Thompson expressed his concern over the abrupt closure of Verified Identity Pass (VIP), which offered a service called Clear for a $199 annual fee that helped air travelers get through airport security checks faster by vetting their identities and backgrounds in advance. VIP has left open the possibility that the data could end up being acquired or sold to a third-party, but only if it was going to be used for a registered traveler program."

5 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. Registered Terrorist^wTraveller Program by BlackSabbath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the Computerworld article:

    "They had your social security information, credit information, where you lived, employment history, fingerprint information," said Clear customer David Maynor, who is chief technical officer with Errata Security in Atlanta. "They should be the only ones who have access to that information."

    and

    "Other providers, who may now be interested in purchasing Clear's assets, include Flo and Preferred Traveler. "

    Given the capability by companies to effectively hide their interested principals through convoluted international structures I wonder how hard it would be for a front-company to buy this info on behalf of criminal organisations, terrorist groups or other nation states.

  2. Re:Pay for Security w/o as much Hassle? by Kijori · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rather brilliantly, by having this card you didn't reduce the security checks at the airport - you just got to skip to the front of the queue. This does mean that security wasn't compromised in the slightest - but it also raises the question of why the company kept doing expensive background checks that served no purpose since the card didn't get you through security!

  3. I am more bothered by the fact we need them by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and that the TSA cannot do this BY NOW.

    Let alone the whole fact that the TSA is yet another example of government sanctioned Political Connectedness run amok. My mom finally had a flight; she flies a few times a years; where she didn't get stopped. What makes her stand out? Oh, I dunno, but age sixty plus white women with small dogs are apparently a threat to US security. They don't even seem to notice her bag with needles for her insulin, or the pump attached to her. Yeah, last time she traveled she didn't have the dog.

    Throw in the stories about how the TSA cannot profile and then how do we expect to have "security". You get it by profiling. Sorry, but when the next plane gets 'jacked all that political connectedness will have done what? Gotten more people killed.

    Besides, the next method will be to shoot one down that is taking off. That will make 9/11's flight scares look benign.

    So now we need private companies because the efficiency of a union staffed government agency is below par. What part of DUH don't people understand. Yet so many here want to turn over their health care to these same goons who can't even get you to your plane on time. Where is the proper sense of priorities here?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  4. Re:Pay for Security w/o as much Hassle? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I fly a couple times a week and can assure you that the hassle is not designed to keep you safer.

    Actually, it is. Various studies have shown that people under stress are likely to panic when they are hassled or surprised, and make mistakes. If you are about to blow up a plane, you are under a lot of stress and the kind of thing that is slightly irritating for the rest of us is a major psychological problem.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Pay for Security w/o as much Hassle? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The USAF used to be pretty good a security (but I'm talking early '70s here). Once when I was on light duty because of an injury, they loaned me to the SPs (USAF equivalent to MPs) to test flightline security. They held my security badge and had me try to get in the cockpit of a C5-A holding a cardboard box. It was actually skewed in my favor, because my job was normally on the flightline hauling AGE equipment.

    I did actually get in once, I think somebody got in trouble over that. After the test the flightline people were a lot more observant.