Slashdot Mirror


NASA Suggests Nano Robots To Explore Mars

destinyland writes "'We're going to have to do extensive robotic exploration,' says the director of NASA's Ames Research Center, suggesting nanotechnology to build self-replicating robots on Mars. Genetically engineering extraction and construction microbes could 'grow' electrical components, and eventually convert carbon dioxide on Mars into oxygen. 'If we really want to settle Mars, and we don't want to have to carry millions of tons of equipment with us to duplicate the way we live on Earth, these technologies will be key.' This interview with Peter Worden, the director of NASA's Ames Research Center, was just featured in the summer issue of H+ magazine, and he also argues that robots will be necessary to first survey Mars for underground microbes and protect the unique Martian biosphere, since it may contain clues about earth's own first life forms. In fact, given the water and carbon that's been discovered on Mars, the possibility of underground microbes is still considered real, and Worden argues that Mars 'may already be supporting life.'"

11 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Finally by lxs · · Score: 3, Funny

    It has taken a while, but finally NASA is taking my plans to use an army of nanobots to build pyramids on Mars seriously.

  2. Until they turn against you by wereHamster · · Score: 4, Informative
  3. Great Idea! Now lets see some self assembly... by purduephotog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but most of the heavy lifting is going to come from genetically engineered microbes.

    I've been following with interest the bacteria that was recently revived from the ice core samples. The assumption (logical or not) is that if they can survive that extreme situation they may be adapted to this sort of extreme condition.

    With GE we can introduce traits, perhaps not as specific as we'd like, but still to tailor the needs. Bacteria that can break down iron oxide into Fe or other easily smeltable materials- that could extract gold (there has been some postulation that 'tracer' gold is nothing more than bacterial waste). We already have some plants that can selectively uptake metals and sequester them in the cellulose - but then breeding those with any other traits destroyed the character set that was capable of doing so.

    I should also state I'm a fan of Mars from KSR- and if we start introducing extremophile bacterial colonies we may never find out if life evolved on that planet. I for one am waiting for that little tidbit and the Vatican's response (I expect it to be something along the lines of "Not intelligent thus God discarded the world as unsuitable", but I digress).

    I say go for it... but I'd really really really want to know that the lab doing the work was fully set up to prevent accidental releases. While an extremophile may not like the conditions outside as too energetic... I'd hate to find out they're quickly adaptable - with those cell walls specifically thickened and hardened to handle UV (another assumption on my part) as well as low pressure they might just turn out to be a bitch to kill. Then again, keeping them in conflict with the UV sterilizer lights might just be the way to grow them hardier :)

  4. Only Sci-Fi by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He basically said: "In order to colonize Mars, we will need to use Technology that doesn't exist yet but I bet that it'll probably be kind of like this."

    Not to rain on anyone's parade, but I'm not sure how this is newsworthy, since it's completely idle speculation.

    1. Re:Only Sci-Fi by SleepingWaterBear · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, they did not go to the Moon using existing technology...

      The technology needed to go to the moon was at least all pretty clear when we decided to do it. We'd already been up in space a few times. We knew how to make most of the bits and pieces we'd need, or at least knew exactly what the things we were missing would look like. We, at the least, knew where to start. In this case it really is pure speculation since we don't even know where to start in engineering the sort of nano technology he's talking about. Maybe 10 years from now something like this might be viable, but until someone can tell me what sort of manufacturing technique will be used to make these nano bots, this is just sci-fi.

  5. Any other science fiction for us? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we even build "Self-replicating nano robots" on EARTH?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Any other science fiction for us? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope, which is why we're now going to try doing it on Mars. Makes sense to me.

  6. News: NASA to create Replicators! by alta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously, has no one at NASA watched stargate? I can tell you how this ends.

    1. NASA creates self replicating nanobot to perform a useful function
    2. life form develops beyond their wildest dreams.
    3. replicators begin attacking humans.
    4. replicators begin to LOOK like humans.
    5. O'neal sticks his face in some mind alterning THING that implants all the knowledge of the ancients.
    6. O'neal makes BFG 3000 that can blast them, but it's not enough.
    7. Daniel and Carter link all the stargates, creating one big distributed network (internet?)
    8. Ba'al, big evil Goa'uld, knows the secret code to set off super-weapon in the temple where the Jaffa live...
    9. 'super radiation' kills travels through all the portals across the universe, killing off the replicators.

    So, someone go ahead and tell NASA to cut it out.
    Can't they see this ended badly?
    Somehow this lead to a new storyline with the stupid Oreye, Ori, whatever they are.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  7. Self-replicating robots... by RobVB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe I've watched too much science fiction, but building self-replicating robots never seems to turn out quite the way you'd want. A few examples: the NS5 robots from I, Robot, the Decepticons - although those weren't man-made, and the Cylons. Is this something we want to recreate? Because humanity only survived the Cylon invasion thanks to the Galactica, so maybe NASA should think about building a few Battlestars before they go messing around with things they don't fully understand. Hey, maybe that's what the NSA is planning to work on in Utah?

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  8. Evil not included by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ignoring the robots-turning-evil angle on this, let's consider a more likely scenario. Probably any self replicating nano-things would be bacteria, or possibly very small machines that act like bacteria. I see two very likely scenarios that don't require any sort of thought, agency, or evil on their part:

    1) Being designed to convert CO2 to O2, some of these things get carried back to earth (inside of human lungs, perhaps) and radically alter earth's atmosphere, or

    2) They mutate and start metabolizing other things, like rocks or people.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  9. Re:Magnetic Field Issues by Tangent128 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... semi-serious-question: how much would it cost to just surround the Martian equator with a closed circuit of solar cells? And would that current generate a sufficient magnetic field?