Slashdot Mirror


Gaze-Tracking Software Protects Computer Privacy

Ponca City, We Love You writes "Two years ago computer security expert Bill Anderson read about scientific research on how the human eye moves as it reads and processes text and images. 'This obscure characteristic... suddenly struck me as (a solution to) a security problem,' says Anderson. With the help of a couple of software developers, Anderson developed a software program called Chameleon that tracks a viewer's gaze patterns and only allows an authorized user to read text on the screen, while everyone else sees gibberish. Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes to show only that one person the correct text. After a 15-second calibration period in which the software learns the viewer's gaze patterns, anyone looking over that user's shoulder sees dummy text that randomly and constantly changes. To tap the broader consumer market, Anderson built a more consumer-friendly version called PrivateEye, which can work with a simple Webcam to blur a user's monitor when he or she turns away. It also detects other faces in the background, and a small video screen pops up to alert the user that someone is looking at the screen. 'There have been inventions in the space of gaze-tracking. There have been inventions in the space of security,' says Anderson. 'But nobody has put the two ideas together, as far as we know.'"

32 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Flat screens! by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought we already had this technology, and it was called "flat screen" technology. I swear I'm not a crotchety old man, but I can't stand flat screen monitors/TV's/laptops. All of them have this same effect, when compared to the bright, clear, viewable-from-any-direction CRT's. I don't care much for saving a few inches in depth, so I try to use CRT's whenever I can, because unless you're sitting directly in front and center of a flat screen anything, it's very difficult to read.

    1. Re:Flat screens! by Enleth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does this still bother you, even with today's LCDs? I'm currently sitting at the side of my desk, typing this on a laptop, and I can read the text just fine on either of the two Dell 1905FP LCDs at the center of my desk, with one about 40cm away at a 45deg angle and the other about 80cm away at a 70deg angle. Both are displaying 12pt black-on-white antialiased text (PDFs) at 90dpi.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    2. Re:Flat screens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get an IPS panel LCD instead of a cheap TN panel LCD. Costs more, but looks much better.

    3. Re:Flat screens! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all about the quality of the monitor. Cheap LCDs are lousy just like cheap CRTs were lousy - they just fail in different ways. Shop around and you can find a flat panel with a good viewing angle as well as decent color reproduction.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  2. Ok? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what happens when you are typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat? Will the gaze thingy be able to follow or will you pass in and out of it's "verified" zone?

    Perhaps it would do better to map your face like they do at gambling casinos. Then if it sees anyone other than your face, it takes corrective action.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Ok? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      typing and listening to music, you head is swinging back and forth to the beat

      Exactly! This is gonna be a big problem for Stevie Wonder - oh wait...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Ok? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, could you help me find the bug in my code?"

      "Ummmm....it looks like you just have gibberish."

    3. Re:Ok? by True+Vox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you mean this: http://oculislabs.com/Products/ChameleonP.htm If so... then you might consider RTFA... as this is who they're talking about lol.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
  3. Technology vs People Problems by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your workers are handling sensitive material maybe you shouldn't have them in a cubicle with their back to the entrance.

    1. Re:Technology vs People Problems by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, if they're working on sensitive material, they should never work on an airplane or in a coffee shop. This has been known for a long time by people who work with sensitive material on paper. You don't get it out in a public area, and you don't talk about it in a public place. Nor do you rely on odd technological measures that might fail.

      The other reasons make a good deal more sense, but I don't know that it's worth the price and inconvenience just to read porn in public or do your taxes.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. oh, it's "gaze" tracking by erg5hp · · Score: 2, Funny

    thought they were picking on Clay and the boys . . .

  5. more inexpensive solution by davek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98. Can't work without it.

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/2940/

    --
    6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
    1. Re:more inexpensive solution by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do know that if you go to an auto parts store you can get almost the exact same thing for a hell of a lot less don't you?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:more inexpensive solution by ScoLgo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Resurrect the Cult of VI"

      I don't get it. Is this 'VI' you refer to some minor demon that is 0.009009 as evil as the beast?

      Oh, what's that? You're not 'Roman' Catholic?

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    3. Re:more inexpensive solution by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With regard to over-the-shoulder power, I bought by first CHIMP in 98. Can't work without it.

      I use a clear piece of plastic, like half of a CD case with the insert removed. Stick it on a shelf near the monitor and with the right angle it is just as good for detecting someone behind your back, but since it is not an obvious mirror, they won't know that you know they are there. I've freaked out a number of people with my 'psychic' ability to detect someone standing at the door to my office while looking the other way and with the music blasting on my headphones.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  6. Gaze-Tracking Software by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This gaze-tracking software will hurt the US military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy.

  7. I smell venture capital PR by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful
    TFA's description of the technology contains a bit of hand-waving:

    Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes

    Check, that's doable now.

    to show only that one person the correct text.

    How? Elfin magic? If a screen region under the "authorized reader's" field of view is displaying the protected content to the authorized reader, it's also displaying exactly the same thing to anyone else who happens to be looking at the same area.

    So far as I can tell, this is the part of the proof labeled "Magic happens here". Also known as the part of the technology that needs more investment. So invest now!

    Where's my flying car, dammit?

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:I smell venture capital PR by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the screen shows constantly changing random words, it would be difficult for someone approaching your screen to figure out exactly which point on the screen you were looking at.

      Not that difficult, if the shoulder-surfer could watch for more than a few seconds. Especially if part of the screen seemed to show a consistent typeface, flowing sentences, coherent subject matter... i.e., anything not obviously random. Humans are damn good at pattern recognition. Moreso, if the shoulder-surfer has some idea what he's looking for, and the "authorized reader" is unaware he's being monitored. And don't deny that can happen. Anyone capable of concentrating sufficiently to work well is going to lose some environmental awareness, and a sufficiently sneaky voyeur would be able to benefit from that.

      Overall, though, it would probably make more sense, and be cheaper, to avoid working on your private material where other people can see your screen

      Yup. This smells like a solution looking to shoulder out existing and simpler solutions.

      Paradoxically, the "consumer-grade" idea in TFA actually seems more valuable: The display is normal, but when your eyes leave it the whole thing blanks. This helps solve the very-real and not-well-solved problem of leaving terminals unattended.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:I smell venture capital PR by hacksoncode · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It doesn't say specifically, but I'm guessing it makes use of the saccade effect. Your brain literally doesn't see changes in the visual field while your eyes are moving from one spot to another (this motion is called a saccade).

      So, basically, the text is only "correct" in the exact spot you're looking at any instant... as soon as your eyes move to the next word, the gibberish that's there before the saccade is changed to the "correct" word for that new spot. And you don't notice.

      Anyone that the camera is not tracking would just see random gibberish because the words they are looking at usually haven't been changed to be the "correct" ones for that spot at the instant they are looking at them.

      It's a well known process... just never applied to the field of security before. Also, it would take a very high-speed, very high-resolution camera, so I doubt it's applicability to general purpose computers any time soon.

      And, of course, if someone watching you has the same high-speed, high-resolution camera that you have, they could just record the whole video stream and perform an analysis on it... so it's not terribly good security either.

    3. Re:I smell venture capital PR by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes... "Check, that's doable now."

      Well, sort of. A decent eye tracker (example 1, example 2) costs $15,000 to $30,000 (please do not request a link to a price quote - the fact that they don't list prices on their pages should be a good clue). And this scrambling system would be worse than useless with a bad eye tracker. (PS, please, please prove me wrong by posting a link to a cheap, robust, accurate eye-tracking solution!)

    4. Re:I smell venture capital PR by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      and if I'm looking at boobies, it will show constantly changing, random boobies, so it would difficult for someone approaching the screen to figure out exactly which boobies on the screen I was looking at.

      My eyes are up here!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  8. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you actually, say, worked with a privacy screen? The ones which have been foisted upon me suck. That and, oh, yeah, they don't work with laptops. However, an even sweeter rendition would be focus follows gaze, particularly for X11 and the random desktop environments. Then instead of wiggling the mouse every time I switch screens, I could just type where I'm looking. Obviously, it should hold the focus and let me keep typing if I'm still typing when I look away.

  9. It's an automatic "Boss" key!! by thewils · · Score: 5, Funny

    I could have used this when I was playing Prince of Persia on one of my previous contracts!!!

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  10. Here's the Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  11. Loony Bin by JobyOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now things really will wiggle around when I'm not looking right at them.

    How am I supposed to tell the difference between PrivateEye and gremlins?

    --
    Porquoi?
  12. Eye strain by slummy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about eye strain from the constant blurring/clarification process?
    I would think a person using this technology would have to train themselves not to try and focus on an area of the screen that would normally be in focus until the "gaze" sensor figures out what they're trying to look at.

  13. Re:or you can just add a privacy screen by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do they include a free cone of silence as well?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  14. A better use for gaze tech by stokessd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Screw privacy, I want my window manager to focus the window I'm looking at. Now that would be useful.

    Sheldon

  15. Awesome! by kheldan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like an awesome development in the area of personal security alright -- especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work. Your boss or co-worker peers over the wall to try to catch you? No problem, it blurs the screen!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Awesome! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny

      especially for looking at porn in your cubicle at work.

      Careful there. What if your boss notices that only the guys in the porn flicks stay in focus, while the chicks are blurred...

  16. CRAP!! Next DMCA intrusion by eatvegetables · · Score: 5, Funny
    Crap! Soon we'll get T.V.s that know that their being watched, who is watching, and exactly what viewers are looking at. ...Coming soon to a T.V. near you.

    Viewer: (thinking to himself) Oh great, a commercial. Time for a potty break. la, la, la (walks away from T.V.)

    T.V.: (in loud voice) Alert, Alert, Alert. Viewer, you have been away from the television for 2 minutes and 30 seconds. You now risk violating your television and cable provider's ULA and risk violating section 5, paragraph 10, subsection a of the 2010 DMCA redux and expansion act.

    Viewer: Coming, coming...just have to give a quick shake....O.K., I'm here. Whew, that was close.

    T.V.: Alert, Alert, Alert!!

    Viewer: Wha!, I'm here. I'm watching again for God's sake.

    T.V.: Viewer, you twice failed to take visual notice of the coke can product placement in this episode of Friends. You have now violated your television and cable provider's ULA and thus also violated the aforementioned DCMA act. Please place your hands on your head and wait for the authorities to arrive....a little higher please...there you go.

  17. Uh-oh by brusk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sunglasses will be considered a DMCA violation.

    --
    .sig withheld by request